Adaptive mine planning under geological uncertainty: A POMDP framework for sequential decision-making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13702v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 15:52:29 GMT
• Title: Adaptive mine planning under geological uncertainty: A POMDP framework for sequential decision-making
• Abstract summary: We formulate mine scheduling as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP)<n>We introduce a hybrid SA-POMDP architecture that combines simulated annealing-based (SA) value approximation with ensemble-based belief updating.<n>We evaluate the framework on a copper-gold open-pit mining complex with multiple processing destinations.
• Score: 0.13048920509133807
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Strategic mine production scheduling under geological uncertainty is conventionally formulated as a stochastic optimization problem in which a fixed extraction sequence and routing decisions are computed ex ante. This plan-driven paradigm treats uncertainty as passive: decisions are hedged across geological scenarios, but planning does not anticipate how future observations will inform future decisions. We propose a different perspective by formulating mine scheduling as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP), in which extraction and routing decisions are made sequentially with planning explicitly integrating the expectation of future belief updates. To achieve computational tractability, we introduce a hybrid SA-POMDP architecture that combines simulated annealing-based (SA) value approximation with ensemble-based belief updating via ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation (ES-MDA). At each decision epoch, candidate actions are evaluated through their expected long-term value under the current belief, and the belief is updated as mining observations are assimilated. This yields an adaptive policy rather than a fixed plan. We evaluate the framework on a copper-gold open-pit mining complex with multiple processing destinations. Under a statistically consistent prior, the SA-POMDP reduces the expectation-reality gap from 22.3% to 4.6%, improving realized NPV by USD8.4M relative to one-shot stochastic optimization. Under systematic prior misspecification of 10%, the adaptive framework outperforms static planning by up to USD44.6M (36.9%), demonstrating structural robustness beyond scenario hedging. These results show that sequential belief updating transforms geological uncertainty from a passive constraint into an active component of value creation.

Related papers

• Decision-Driven Geosteering Under Uncertainty: A Unified Framework for Sequential Decision Optimization [0.0]
  Geosteering requires navigating a well trajectory through an unknown geological configuration.<n>This work presents an uncertainty-aware geosteering framework that integrates particle filtering for probabilistic subsurface interpretation with value-based reinforcement learning for sequential decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T22:22:13Z)
• LeapTS: Rethinking Time Series Forecasting as Adaptive Multi-Horizon Scheduling [74.94985663101906]
  We present LeapTS, a novel framework that reformulates time series forecasting as a dynamic scheduling process over the prediction horizon.<n>We show that LeapTS improves overall forecasting performance by at least 7.4% while achieving a 2.6$times$ to 5.3$times$ inference speedup over representative Transformer-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T09:54:02Z)
• Deep Learning Decision Support System for Open-Pit Mining Optimisation: GPU-Accelerated Planning Under Geological Uncertainty [0.7310043452300737]
  This study introduces a fully uncertainty-aware optimization framework for long-term open-pit mine planning.<n> Geological uncertainty is modelled using a Variational Autoencoder trained on 50,000 spatial grade samples.<n>Results demonstrate up to 1.2 million-fold improvement over IBM CPLEX and significantly higher expected NPV under geological uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T05:27:04Z)
• Conformal Prediction in The Loop: A Feedback-Based Uncertainty Model for Trajectory Optimization [3.761729592527251]
  Conformal Prediction (CP) is a powerful statistical machine learning tool to construct uncertainty sets with coverage guarantees.<n>We propose a novel Feedback-Based CP (Fb-CP) framework for shrinking-horizon TO with a joint risk constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T07:11:23Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Probabilistic Forecasts for Safe Decision-Making via Conditional Value-at-Risk Planning [41.52380204321823]
  This paper presents the Uncertainty-Aware Markov Decision Process (UAMDP), a unified framework that couples Bayesian forecasting, posterior-sampling reinforcement learning, and planning.<n>We evaluate UAMDP in two domains-high-frequency equity trading and retail inventory control-both marked by structural uncertainty and economic volatility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T13:46:32Z)
• Efficient Learning of POMDPs with Known Observation Model in Average-Reward Setting [56.92178753201331]
  We propose the Observation-Aware Spectral (OAS) estimation technique, which enables the POMDP parameters to be learned from samples collected using a belief-based policy. We show the consistency of the OAS procedure, and we prove a regret guarantee of order $mathcalO(sqrtT log(T)$ for the proposed OAS-UCRL algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T08:46:34Z)
• Weathering Ongoing Uncertainty: Learning and Planning in a Time-Varying Partially Observable Environment [14.646280719661465]
  Environmental variability over time can significantly impact the system's optimal decision making strategy. We propose a two-pronged approach to accurately estimate and plan within the TV-POMDP. We validate the proposed framework and algorithms using simulations and robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T03:20:42Z)
• Robust and Adaptive Temporal-Difference Learning Using An Ensemble of Gaussian Processes [70.80716221080118]
  The paper takes a generative perspective on policy evaluation via temporal-difference (TD) learning. The OS-GPTD approach is developed to estimate the value function for a given policy by observing a sequence of state-reward pairs. To alleviate the limited expressiveness associated with a single fixed kernel, a weighted ensemble (E) of GP priors is employed to yield an alternative scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-01T23:15:09Z)
• Modular Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Motion Planning with Temporal Logic [59.94347858883343]
  This paper investigates the motion planning of autonomous dynamical systems modeled by Markov decision processes (MDP) The novelty is to design an embedded product MDP (EP-MDP) between the LDGBA and the MDP. The proposed LDGBA-based reward shaping and discounting schemes for the model-free reinforcement learning (RL) only depend on the EP-MDP states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T01:11:25Z)
• Learning Interpretable Deep State Space Model for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting [98.57851612518758]
  Probabilistic time series forecasting involves estimating the distribution of future based on its history. We propose a deep state space model for probabilistic time series forecasting whereby the non-linear emission model and transition model are parameterized by networks. We show in experiments that our model produces accurate and sharp probabilistic forecasts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-31T06:49:33Z)
• Identification of Unexpected Decisions in Partially Observable Monte-Carlo Planning: a Rule-Based Approach [78.05638156687343]
  We propose a methodology for analyzing POMCP policies by inspecting their traces. The proposed method explores local properties of policy behavior to identify unexpected decisions. We evaluate our approach on Tiger, a standard benchmark for POMDPs, and a real-world problem related to mobile robot navigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-23T15:09:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.