ScioMind: Cognitively Grounded Multi-Agent Social Simulation with Anchoring-Based Belief Dynamics and Dynamic Profiles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13725v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 16:07:00 GMT
• Title: ScioMind: Cognitively Grounded Multi-Agent Social Simulation with Anchoring-Based Belief Dynamics and Dynamic Profiles
• Abstract summary: Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent simulation offers a powerful testbed for studying social opinion dynamics.<n>We introduce ScioMind, a cognitively grounded simulation framework that bridges structured opinion dynamics with agent reasoning.<n>We evaluate ScioMind on multiple case studies in a real-world policy debate scenario.
• Score: 12.64432580192871
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent simulation offers a powerful testbed for studying social opinion dynamics. Yet current approaches often adopt two contrasting methods: either relying on fixed update rules with limited cognitive grounding or delegating belief change largely to unconstrained LLM interaction. We introduce ScioMind, a cognitively grounded simulation framework that bridges these paradigms by combining structured opinion dynamics with LLM-based agent reasoning. ScioMind integrates three key components: 1) a memory-anchored belief update rule that modulates susceptibility to influence via personality-conditioned anchoring strength; 2) a hierarchical memory architecture that supports persistent, experience-driven belief formation; and 3) dynamic agent profiles derived from a corpus-grounded retrieval pipeline, enabling heterogeneous personalities, rationales, and evolving internal states. We evaluate ScioMind on multiple case studies in a real-world policy debate scenario. Across metrics including polarisation, diversity, extremization, and trajectory stability, the proposed components consistently yield improvements in behavioural realism. In particular, dynamic profiles increase opinion diversity, memory and reflection reduce unstable oscillation, and anchoring induces persistent belief trajectories that better align with patterns reported in political psychology. These results suggest that our cognitively grounded design provides a novel solution to LLM-based social simulation that improves both stable and behavioural realism

Related papers

• Self-Emergence Agent Architecture:Behavior-Inertia HMM, Reflexive Metacognition,and Social-Contrastive Self-Modeling [7.511170831919511]
  Large language model (LLM) agents exhibit strong language-generation and problem-solving capabilities, yet suffer from three structural limitations.<n>Existing generative-agent simulations rely on memory and fixed prompts, maintaining neither behavioral inertia nor endogenous self-reflection.<n>We propose the Self-Emergence Agent Architecture (SEAA), which integrates three components: (i) a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) that encodes long-term behavioral and cognitive inertia as an editable state-transition matrix; (ii) a Reflexion-style verbal metacognition loop whose output updates the HMM parameters themselves; and (iii
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T15:36:10Z)
• Revising Context, Shifting Simulated Stance: Auditing LLM-Based Stance Simulation in Online Discussions [62.99524765341952]
  Large language models are increasingly used to simulate social media users.<n>We study counterfactual context revision as a framework for auditing LLM-based stance simulation.<n>Results reveal effective and robust stance transitions in both text-only and multimodal strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T17:41:54Z)
• Stop Drawing Scientific Claims from LLM Social Simulations Without Robustness Audits [11.902271500463934]
  Generative agents bring new expressive power to agent-based modeling.<n>Small perturbations that appear minor to researchers can cascade into macro-level outcomes.<n>We introduce TRAILS, a robustness-audit taxonomy spanning three levels of simulation design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T00:21:53Z)
• Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond [209.35045331678043]
  We introduce a "levels x laws" taxonomy organized along two axes.<n>The first defines three capability levels: L1 Predictor, which learns one-step local transition operators; L2 Simulator, which composes them into multi-step, action-conditioned rollouts that respect domain laws; and L3 Evolver, which autonomously revises its own model when predictions fail against new evidence.<n>We synthesize over 400 works and summarize more than 100 representative systems spanning model-based reinforcement learning, video generation, web and GUI agents, multi-agent social simulation, and AI-driven scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T17:48:47Z)
• Learning Dynamic Belief Graphs for Theory-of-mind Reasoning [5.807546348023422]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) reasoning with Large Language Models (LLMs) requires inferring how people's implicit, evolving beliefs shape what they seek and how they act under uncertainty.<n>We introduce a structured cognitive trajectory model for LLM-based ToM that represents mental state as a dynamic belief graph.<n>Our model significantly improves action prediction and recovers interpretable belief trajectories consistent with human reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T17:46:55Z)
• Aligning Agentic World Models via Knowledgeable Experience Learning [68.85843641222186]
  We introduce WorldMind, a framework that constructs a symbolic World Knowledge Repository by synthesizing environmental feedback.<n>WorldMind achieves superior performance compared to baselines with remarkable cross-model and cross-environment transferability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T17:33:31Z)
• HUMANLLM: Benchmarking and Reinforcing LLM Anthropomorphism via Human Cognitive Patterns [59.17423586203706]
  We present HUMANLLM, a framework treating psychological patterns as interacting causal forces.<n>We construct 244 patterns from 12,000 academic papers and synthesize 11,359 scenarios where 2-5 patterns reinforce, conflict, or modulate each other.<n>Our dual-level checklists evaluate both individual pattern fidelity and emergent multi-pattern dynamics, achieving strong human alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T08:56:53Z)
• DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios [57.327907850766785]
  characterization of deception across realistic real-world scenarios remains underexplored.<n>We establish DeceptionBench, the first benchmark that systematically evaluates how deceptive tendencies manifest across different domains.<n>On the intrinsic dimension, we explore whether models exhibit self-interested egoistic tendencies or sycophantic behaviors that prioritize user appeasement.<n>We incorporate sustained multi-turn interaction loops to construct a more realistic simulation of real-world feedback dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T10:14:26Z)
• Rethinking the Role of Dynamic Sparse Training for Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning [58.533203990515034]
  Scaling neural networks has driven breakthrough advances in machine learning, yet this paradigm fails in deep reinforcement learning (DRL)<n>We show that dynamic sparse training strategies provide module-specific benefits that complement the primary scalability foundation established by architectural improvements.<n>We finally distill these insights into Module-Specific Training (MST), a practical framework that exploits the benefits of architectural improvements and demonstrates substantial scalability gains across diverse RL algorithms without algorithmic modifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T03:03:08Z)
• DynamiX: Large-Scale Dynamic Social Network Simulator [101.65679342680542]
  DynamiX is a novel large-scale social network simulator dedicated to dynamic social network modeling.<n>For opinion leaders, we propose an information-stream-based link prediction method recommending potential users with similar stances.<n>For ordinary users, we construct an inequality-oriented behavior decision-making module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T12:13:30Z)
• The Traitors: Deception and Trust in Multi-Agent Language Model Simulations [0.0]
  We introduce The Traitors, a multi-agent simulation framework inspired by social deduction games.<n>We develop a suite of evaluation metrics capturing deception success, trust dynamics, and collective inference quality.<n>Our initial experiments across DeepSeek-V3, GPT-4o-mini, and GPT-4o (10 runs per model) reveal a notable asymmetry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T10:01:35Z)
• Towards Causal Model-Based Policy Optimization [0.24578723416255752]
  We introduce Causal Model-Based Policy Optimization (C-MBPO)<n>C-MBPO is a novel framework that integrates causal learning into the Model-Based Reinforcement Learning pipeline.<n>We show that C-MBPO can be shown to be robust to a class of distributional shifts that affect spurious, non-causal relationships in the dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T18:09:02Z)
• Large Language Model Driven Agents for Simulating Echo Chamber Formation [5.6488384323017]
  The rise of echo chambers on social media platforms has heightened concerns about polarization and the reinforcement of existing beliefs.<n>Traditional approaches for simulating echo chamber formation have often relied on predefined rules and numerical simulations.<n>We present a novel framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) as generative agents to simulate echo chamber dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T12:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.