A Non-Destructive Methodological Framework for Modernizing Legacy Clinical Reporting Systems for AI-Driven Pharmacoinformatics: A SAS Case Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13905v1
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 01:15:46 GMT
- Title: A Non-Destructive Methodological Framework for Modernizing Legacy Clinical Reporting Systems for AI-Driven Pharmacoinformatics: A SAS Case Study
- Abstract summary: Drug development and pharmacovigilance are frequently bottlenecked by legacy clinical reporting pipelines.<n>Existing modernization approaches force a choice between full rewrites and incremental modernization.<n>We present a non-destructive framework achieving AI-driven pharmacoinformatics readiness without altering legacy source code.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Drug development and pharmacovigilance are frequently bottlenecked by legacy clinical reporting pipelines. These monolithic systems encode regulatory-grade logic but resist AI integration by producing opaque output with no machine-readable intermediate layer. Existing modernization approaches force a choice between full rewrites and incremental refactoring that preserves structural barriers. We present a non-destructive methodological framework achieving AI-driven pharmacoinformatics readiness without altering legacy source code. A metadata layer--comprising a bridge map, a typed Intermediate Representation (IR), and an orchestrator--wraps existing components and re-exposes their outputs as structured data consumable by LLMs. It enables optional incremental consolidation, replacing selected legacy components with metadata-configured core routines while the remainder operates unchanged. Validated on a 558-component SAS reporting library (373,000 lines of code), the framework demonstrated immediate AI-readiness under coexistence mode, yielding machine-readable output. Where consolidation was elected, the modernized core achieved a 92% reduction in proprietary code. Parity validation on 14 report types from a Phase III study achieved cell-level parity of 80% or above on 11 reports (mean 82.7%, best 99.2%). A benchmark using CDISC CDISCPilot01 data achieved 100% parity across 5 reports. LLM experiments confirmed the IR enables automated pharmacovigilance, table summarization, and trial configuration generation. The framework offers a regulation-aware path to AI-integrated clinical reporting, accelerating drug development without interrupting regulatory submissions.
Related papers
- Artificial Intelligence for Energy Optimization in Data Centers [0.0]
Data centers are increasingly optimized by artificial intelligence and, at the same time, increasingly loaded by it.<n>We screen roughly 194 papers retrieved through a documented protocol, code 63 of them, and report what the coding shows.<n>We set out CLEARDC, a framework coupling a control-policy branch to a workload-demand branch through an explicit elasticity term, reads out net rather than direct benefit, and emits a schema-conformant record covering energy, carbon, water, embodied share and validation venue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-03T11:51:15Z) - A-SR: Self-Evolving Agentic LLMs for Symbolic Regression via Hierarchical Coordination [51.06539604709775]
We propose A-SR, a self-evolving agentic framework that shifts the control unit from expression edits to role-conditioned evidence views.<n>A-SR coordinates formula discovery through routing among coordination protocols, an online evaluator-reward role policy, and state-routed process memory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-05T14:01:10Z) - Imputation Meets Clustering: Exploiting Latent Subgroup Structure for Missing Data Recovery [52.29866804948133]
We propose CAGI (Cluster-Aware Generative Imputation), a framework that reformulates clustering and imputation as a mutually reinforcing co-optimization process.<n>Experiments on 14 benchmark datasets with 15 representative baselines demonstrate the superiority of CAGI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-08T02:50:02Z) - STaR-DRO: Stateful Tsallis Reweighting for Group-Robust Structured Prediction [0.20165644958637055]
We present a two-part framework for controllable inference and robust fine-tuning.<n>First, we introduce a task-agnostic prompting strategy to address format drift, label ambiguity, evidence hallucination, and metadata-conditioned confusion.<n>Second, we introduce STaR-DRO, a stateful robust optimization method for group heterogeneity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-09T21:58:42Z) - DISCO-TAB: A Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Framework for Privacy-Preserving Synthesis of Complex Clinical Data [2.3915781021862332]
DISCO-TAB is a novel framework that orchestrates a fine-tuned LLM with a multi-objective discriminator system optimized via Reinforcement Learning.<n>We rigorously validate our framework across diverse benchmarks, including high-dimensional, small-sample medical datasets.<n>Our results demonstrate that hierarchical feedback yields state-of-the-art performance, achieving up to 38.2% improvement in downstream clinical utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T23:37:58Z) - Needle in the Repo: A Benchmark for Maintainability in AI-Generated Repository Edits [3.9532936038777144]
We present Needle in the Repo (NITR), a framework for evaluating whether behaviorally correct repository edits preserve maintainable structure.<n>NITR distills recurring software engineering wisdom into controlled probes embedded in small, realistic multi-files.<n>We evaluate 23 coding configurations across GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Qwen families in both direct-inference and agent-based settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-29T15:56:05Z) - Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z) - Architecture-Aware Multi-Design Generation for Repository-Level Feature Addition [53.50448142467294]
RAIM is a multi-design and architecture-aware framework for repository-level feature addition.<n>It shifts away from linear patching by generating multiple diverse implementation designs.<n>Experiments on the NoCode-bench Verified dataset demonstrate that RAIM establishes a new state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T12:50:40Z) - MedVerse: Efficient and Reliable Medical Reasoning via DAG-Structured Parallel Execution [63.128360383691295]
We propose MedVerse, a reasoning framework for complex medical inference.<n>For data creation, we introduce the MedVerse Curator, which synthesizes knowledge-grounded medical reasoning paths.<n>We develop a customized inference engine that supports parallel execution without additional overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-07T12:54:01Z) - From Completion to Editing: Unlocking Context-Aware Code Infilling via Search-and-Replace Instruction Tuning [81.97788535387286]
We propose a framework that internalizes the agentic verification-and-editing mechanism into a unified, single-pass inference process.<n>With minimal data, SRI-Coder enables Chat models to surpass the completion performance of their Base counterparts.<n>Unlike FIM-style tuning, SRI preserves general coding competencies and maintains inference latency comparable to standard FIM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T20:33:53Z) - QiMeng-NeuComBack: Self-Evolving Translation from IR to Assembly Code [52.66657751895655]
Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a compelling new paradigm: Neural Compilation.<n>This paper introduces NeuComBack, a novel benchmark dataset specifically designed for IR-to-assembly compilation.<n>We propose a self-evolving prompt optimization method that enables LLMs to evolve their internal prompt strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-03T03:20:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.