Separating Intrinsic Ambiguity from Estimation Uncertainty in Deep Generative Models for Linear Inverse Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15050v1
• Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 16:45:19 GMT
• Title: Separating Intrinsic Ambiguity from Estimation Uncertainty in Deep Generative Models for Linear Inverse Problems
• Abstract summary: Deep generative models have been used for inverse problems in medical imaging and scientific discovery.<n> posterior uncertainty is difficult to interpret because it can mix ambiguity inherent to the forward operator with uncertainty propagated through inference.<n>We introduce a structural decomposition of posterior uncertainty that isolates intrinsic ambiguity.
• Score: 6.922232153871751
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recently, deep generative models have been used for posterior inference in inverse problems, including high-stakes applications in medical imaging and scientific discovery, where the uncertainty of a prediction can matter as much as the prediction itself. However, posterior uncertainty is difficult to interpret because it can mix ambiguity inherent to the forward operator with uncertainty propagated through inference. We introduce a structural decomposition of posterior uncertainty that isolates intrinsic ambiguity. A cascade formulation makes this ambiguity accessible for calibration analysis, enabling qualitative diagnostics and simulation-based calibration tests that reveal failure modes that remain hidden when models are selected by reconstruction quality alone. We first validate the approach on a Gaussian example with analytical posterior structure, then illustrate the decomposition on accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and finally apply the calibration diagnostics to electroencephalography (EEG) source imaging.

Related papers

• Evaluating and Calibrating Diffusion Model-derived Uncertainty for Quantitative MRI Mapping [0.504092226811181]
  Evaluation on synthetic test data assessed error-awareness, high-error detection, selective prediction, and Gaussian interval calibration.<n> Diffusion model-derived uncertainty was positively associated with the mapping error.<n>Raw uncertainty was poorly calibrated for quantitative interval interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T11:30:31Z)
• Reconstruction-Shift Discrimination via Mask-Guided Latent Diffusion for Medical Anomaly Detection [58.92871907037662]
  Unsupervised medical anomaly detection learns normal anatomical patterns from healthy training images and identifies deviations at test time.<n>Reconstruction-based and diffusion-based methods commonly use the difference between an input image and its reconstruction as anomaly evidence.<n>We propose discriminative mask-guided diffusion (DMD), a medical anomaly detection framework that complements residual-based localization with reconstruction-shift discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-01T04:56:39Z)
• Rethinking Structural Anomaly Detection: From Decision Boundaries to Projection Operators [51.771100367755544]
  We introduce a geometric perspective to address the mismatch between the inductive bias of existing methods and the structure of the data.<n>Specifically, we learn a projection operator onto the manifold of normal samples and define a sample as anomalous if it is altered by this projection.<n> Notably, it provides a unifying interpretation of reconstruction-based methods by explaining their success and failure in terms of projection quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T12:37:20Z)
• Delving Aleatoric Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation via Vision Foundation Models [56.29123284262618]
  This work proposes leveraging the universal representation capabilities of visual foundation models to estimate inherent data uncertainty.<n>We analyze the feature diversity of the model's decoded representations and quantify their singular value energy to define the semantic perception scale for each class.<n>Based on this foundation, we design two uncertainty-driven application strategies: (1) the aleatoric uncertainty-aware data filtering mechanism to eliminate potentially noisy samples and enhance model learning quality; and (2) the dynamic uncertainty-aware optimization strategy that adaptively adjusts class-specific loss weights during training based on the semantic perception scale, combined with a label denoising mechanism to improve training stability
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T03:59:54Z)
• IRSDE-Despeckle: A Physics-Grounded Diffusion Model for Generalizable Ultrasound Despeckling [0.2580765958706854]
  We present a diffusion-based ultrasound despeckling method built on the Image Restoration Differential Equations framework.<n>To enable supervised training, we curate large paired datasets by simulating ultrasound images from speckle-free magnetic resonance images.<n>The proposed model reconstructs speckle-suppressed images anatomically meaningful edges and contrast.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T07:42:25Z)
• Conformalized Generative Bayesian Imaging: An Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Computational Imaging [0.0]
  Uncertainty quantification plays an important role in achieving trustworthy and reliable learning-based computational imaging.<n>Recent advances in generative modeling and Bayesian neural networks have enabled the development of uncertainty-aware image reconstruction methods.<n>We present a scalable framework that can quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T12:30:46Z)
• Epistemic Uncertainty for Generated Image Detection [107.62647907393377]
  We introduce a novel framework for AI-generated image detection through epistemic uncertainty, aiming to address critical security concerns in the era of generative models.<n>Our key insight stems from the observation that distributional discrepancies between training and testing data manifest distinctively in the epistemic uncertainty space of machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T11:32:25Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Quantifying predictive uncertainty of aphasia severity in stroke patients with sparse heteroscedastic Bayesian high-dimensional regression [47.1405366895538]
  Sparse linear regression methods for high-dimensional data commonly assume that residuals have constant variance, which can be violated in practice. This paper proposes estimating high-dimensional heteroscedastic linear regression models using a heteroscedastic partitioned empirical Bayes Expectation Conditional Maximization algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T22:06:29Z)
• Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes [52.92110730286403]
  It is commonly believed that the marginal likelihood should be reminiscent of cross-validation metrics and that both should deteriorate with larger input dimensions. We prove that by tuning hyper parameters, the performance, as measured by the marginal likelihood, improves monotonically with the input dimension. We also prove that cross-validation metrics exhibit qualitatively different behavior that is characteristic of double descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:09:33Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)
• A deep-learning based Bayesian approach to seismic imaging and uncertainty quantification [0.4588028371034407]
  Uncertainty is essential when dealing with ill-conditioned inverse problems. It is often not possible to formulate a prior distribution that precisely encodes our prior knowledge about the unknown. We propose to use the functional form of a randomly convolutional neural network as an implicit structured prior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T23:46:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.