AI Slop or AI-enhancement? Student perceptions of AI-generated media for an English for Academic Purposes course

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16275v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 09:47:35 GMT
• Title: AI Slop or AI-enhancement? Student perceptions of AI-generated media for an English for Academic Purposes course
• Abstract summary: This paper reports on the development, implementation, and evaluation of teacher-prompted, AI-generated supplemental materials in an English for Academic Purposes course at a Hong Kong Community College.<n>The instructor generated videos, podcasts, infographics, and individualized feedback reports from course materials and student work for 106 English as a Foreign Language learners.<n>Students rated the materials highly for perceived usefulness and ease of use, and preferred assessment-linked content presented in visual and multimodal formats.
• Score: 15.537382882048066
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) tools now enable educators to transform course materials into diverse multimedia at scale. However, it remains unclear whether such AI-generated content functions as a pedagogical scaffold or AI slop: high volume, low quality material. This innovative practice paper reports on the development, implementation, and evaluation of teacher-prompted, AI-generated supplemental materials in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course at a Hong Kong Community College. Using primarily Google Notebook LM, the instructor generated videos, podcasts, infographics, and individualized feedback reports from course materials and student work for 106 English as a Foreign Language learners. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design comprising a survey, semi-structured interviews, and correlation analysis with academic scores was employed to examine students' preferences, perceptions, and learning outcomes. Findings are framed through the Technology Acceptance Model and Cognitive Load Theory. Students rated the materials highly for perceived usefulness and ease of use, and preferred assessment-linked content presented in visual and multimodal formats, particularly videos and infographics. Video preference correlated positively with academic performance; however, higher cognitive load was negatively associated with course grades, indicating that material complexity must be carefully calibrated. Notably, some lower-performing students independently adopted the materials as remedial scaffolds. The practice demonstrates that RAG tools enable scalable personalized feedback that would be less feasible through traditional methods. When aligned with student goals and cognitive principles, teacher-prompted AI generation can meaningfully enhance the EAP learning ecosystem rather than producing AI slop.

Related papers

• Mitigating AI Risks in Computing Education via LLM-Driven Lecture Video Curation [42.89674478896965]
  This study evaluates the effectiveness of utilising large language models (LLMs) to retrieve targeted segments from delivered video recordings to answer student questions in programming environments.<n>We benchmarked three distinct models, two proprietary (Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT 5.4 Pro) and one open-weight (Qwen3.5 397B), against a human lecturer's manual video selections.<n>While the AI-retrieved timestamps rarely shared exact overlaps with the human baseline, the proprietary models achieved near-parity with the expert in delivering sufficient and highly relevant answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-17T05:36:52Z)
• Preparing Students for AI-Powered Materials Discovery: A Workflow-Aligned Framework for AI Literacy, Equity, and Scientific Judgment [0.0]
  We argue that AI education for AI-powered materials discovery must move beyond tool access and surface-level interaction with generative AI systems.<n>The central goal is to prepare students to become better scientists, not merely more efficient users of AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T16:11:01Z)
• Bridging the Skills Gap: A Course Model for Modern Generative AI Education [0.0]
  Generative AI competency is increasingly valued in industry but not in higher education.<n>Authors argue students across fields must be taught to responsibly and expertly harness the potential of AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T21:24:54Z)
• AI Literacy for Community Colleges: Instructors' Perspectives on Scenario-Based and Interactive Approaches to Teaching AI [0.500208619516796]
  This research category full paper investigates how community college instructors evaluate interactive, no-code AI literacy resources designed for non-STEM learners.<n>As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into everyday technologies, AI literacy has emerged as a critical skill across disciplines.<n>We developed AI User, an interactive online curriculum that introduces core AI concepts through scenario - based activities set in real - world contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T15:51:53Z)
• CoCoNUTS: Concentrating on Content while Neglecting Uninformative Textual Styles for AI-Generated Peer Review Detection [60.52240468810558]
  We introduce CoCoNUTS, a content-oriented benchmark built upon a fine-grained dataset of AI-generated peer reviews.<n>We also develop CoCoDet, an AI review detector via a multi-task learning framework, to achieve more accurate and robust detection of AI involvement in review content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T06:03:11Z)
• AI-Powered Math Tutoring: Platform for Personalized and Adaptive Education [0.0]
  We introduce a novel multi-agent AI tutoring platform that combines adaptive and personalized feedback, structured course generation, and textbook knowledge retrieval.<n>This system allows students to learn new topics while identifying and targeting their weaknesses, revise for exams effectively, and practice on an unlimited number of personalized exercises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T20:35:16Z)
• Artificial Intelligence Driven Course Generation: A Case Study Using ChatGPT [0.0]
  The study aims to elaborate on using ChatGPT to create course materials. The main objective is to assess the efficiency, quality, and impact of AI-driven course generation. The study highlights the potential of AI to revolutionize educational content creation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T21:59:02Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
  The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course. We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education. Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z)
• Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
  The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal. In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.