Statistical Unlearning of Distributions: A Hypothesis Testing Approach
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16645v1
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 21:33:38 GMT
- Title: Statistical Unlearning of Distributions: A Hypothesis Testing Approach
- Abstract summary: We propose a statistical framework for distributional unlearning, in which domains are modeled as probability distributions.<n>We formalize this using a hypothesis test of the edited data with the desired and unwanted domains.<n>We prove composition rules that describe how distributional unlearning behaves across multimodal unwanted domains.
- Score: 0.5352699766206808
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Machine learning systems increasingly face requirements to forget not only individual data points, but entire domains of information, such as toxic language, copyrighted corpora, or demographic biases. This raises a fundamental dilemma of statistical-computational tradeoffs: removing all samples from an unwanted domain may be computationally prohibitive, while randomly removing a subset may not provide distribution-level statistical guarantees. We propose a statistical framework for distributional unlearning, in which domains are modeled as probability distributions, and the goal is to remove a carefully chosen subset of samples that reduces the effect of an unwanted distribution while preserving performance on a desired one. We formalize this using a hypothesis test of the edited data with the desired and unwanted domains, leading to an interpretable and robust criterion for selecting samples to remove. Within this statistical framework, we characterize the fundamental region of the allowable edited data distributions and the removal-preservation Pareto frontier for a broad class of distribution families. This includes parametric families such as shifted Gaussians of arbitrary dimension, a one-dimensional location family with log-concave noise, and the one-dimensional Poisson family. It also includes nonparametric families such as the Gaussian white noise model, a canonical model for nonparametric regression. We prove composition rules that describe how distributional unlearning behaves across multimodal unwanted domains, and introduce a central-limit behavior for the removal-preservation baselines when composing a large number of such families. Finally, we provide finite sample guarantees by providing Pareto frontiers for some selection algorithms, and observe an information-computation gap.
Related papers
- How Useful is Causal Invariance for Domain Adaptation in Finite-Sample Settings? [58.740078141879984]
Machine learning models often degrade when they are deployed on a target distribution that differs from the source distributions they were trained on.<n>Recent work in causality-based domain generalization has shown how shared causal structure can induce invariant predictors.<n>In this paper, we study when full or partial causal knowledge can provably improve supervised domain adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-10T21:07:49Z) - VAE-Inf: A statistically interpretable generative paradigm for imbalanced classification [8.677199689027772]
We propose a two-stage framework to bridge the gap between generative modeling and discriminative classification.<n>For inference, we introduce a projection-based score that admits a natural hypothesis testing interpretation.<n>Experiments on diverse real-world benchmarks demonstrate that our framework achieves competitive performance against other approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T07:50:56Z) - Towards Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Real Distribution Bias Correction [62.89674593681203]
We introduce the Real Distribution Bias Correction (RDBC) framework, which consists of two key components.<n>RDBC achieves state-of-the-art performance in both in-domain and cross-domain deepfake detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-14T16:11:00Z) - Distributional Machine Unlearning via Selective Data Removal [37.205511534444966]
We find that a domain's statistical influence is often concentrated in a small subset of its data samples.<n>We formalize this as distributional unlearning: a framework to select a small subset that balances forgetting an unwanted distribution while preserving a desired one.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-20T20:21:23Z) - Rejection via Learning Density Ratios [50.91522897152437]
Classification with rejection emerges as a learning paradigm which allows models to abstain from making predictions.<n>We propose a different distributional perspective, where we seek to find an idealized data distribution which maximizes a pretrained model's performance.<n>Our framework is tested empirically over clean and noisy datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T01:32:17Z) - Anomaly Detection Under Uncertainty Using Distributionally Robust
Optimization Approach [0.9217021281095907]
Anomaly detection is defined as the problem of finding data points that do not follow the patterns of the majority.
The one-class Support Vector Machines (SVM) method aims to find a decision boundary to distinguish between normal data points and anomalies.
A distributionally robust chance-constrained model is proposed in which the probability of misclassification is low.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-03T06:13:22Z) - Correcting Underrepresentation and Intersectional Bias for Classification [49.1574468325115]
We consider the problem of learning from data corrupted by underrepresentation bias.
We show that with a small amount of unbiased data, we can efficiently estimate the group-wise drop-out rates.
We show that our algorithm permits efficient learning for model classes of finite VC dimension.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-19T18:25:44Z) - Data thinning for convolution-closed distributions [2.299914829977005]
We propose data thinning, an approach for splitting an observation into two or more independent parts that sum to the original observation.
We show that data thinning can be used to validate the results of unsupervised learning approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-18T02:47:41Z) - A Prototype-Oriented Framework for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [52.25537670028037]
We provide a memory and computation-efficient probabilistic framework to extract class prototypes and align the target features with them.
We demonstrate the general applicability of our method on a wide range of scenarios, including single-source, multi-source, class-imbalance, and source-private domain adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T19:23:22Z) - Nonlinear Distribution Regression for Remote Sensing Applications [6.664736150040092]
In many remote sensing applications one wants to estimate variables or parameters of interest from observations.
Standard algorithms such as neural networks, random forests or Gaussian processes are readily available to relate to the two.
This paper introduces a nonlinear (kernel-based) method for distribution regression that solves the previous problems without making any assumption on the statistics of the grouped data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-07T22:04:43Z) - Fair Densities via Boosting the Sufficient Statistics of Exponential
Families [72.34223801798422]
We introduce a boosting algorithm to pre-process data for fairness.
Our approach shifts towards better data fitting while still ensuring a minimal fairness guarantee.
Empirical results are present to display the quality of result on real-world data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-01T00:49:17Z) - Identification of Probability weighted ARX models with arbitrary domains [75.91002178647165]
PieceWise Affine models guarantees universal approximation, local linearity and equivalence to other classes of hybrid system.
In this work, we focus on the identification of PieceWise Auto Regressive with eXogenous input models with arbitrary regions (NPWARX)
The architecture is conceived following the Mixture of Expert concept, developed within the machine learning field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-29T12:50:33Z) - Graph Embedding with Data Uncertainty [113.39838145450007]
spectral-based subspace learning is a common data preprocessing step in many machine learning pipelines.
Most subspace learning methods do not take into consideration possible measurement inaccuracies or artifacts that can lead to data with high uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-01T15:08:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.