A Scalable Tool for Measuring Manner and Result Verbs in Developmental Language Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16654v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 21:48:47 GMT
• Title: A Scalable Tool for Measuring Manner and Result Verbs in Developmental Language Research
• Abstract summary: Manner and result verbs encode different aspects of event structure.<n>Large annotated resources for manner and result classification are not currently available.<n>We present a computational approach for identifying manner and result verbs in sentence context.
• Score: 3.8408267966813434
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Manner and result verbs encode different aspects of event structure and have been discussed in developmental work as a potentially informative distinction for studying early verb learning. However, this distinction remains difficult to measure at scale because large annotated resources for manner and result classification are not currently available. We present a computational approach for identifying manner and result verbs in sentence context. Using linguistically informed prompts, we generate sentence-level annotations with large language models over data drawn from MASC and InterCorp, extending coverage from previously annotated portions of VerbNet to 436 classes. We then train a RoBERTa-based classifier on these annotations and evaluate it on three held-out gold-standard datasets, including previously annotated items and a new expert-annotated set. Across these evaluations, the model shows promising performance, with average accuracy up to 89.6%. We present this work as a scalable measurement tool that can support future research on verb semantics in developmental and other language datasets, while noting that further validation is needed for borderline cases, mixed manner/result verbs, and downstream developmental applications.

Related papers

• Large corpora and large language models: a replicable method for automating grammatical annotation [0.0]
  We introduce a methodological pipeline applied to the case study of formal variation in the English evaluative verb construction 'consider X (as) (to be) Y'<n>We reach a model accuracy of over 90% on our held-out test samples with only a small amount of training data.<n>We discuss the generalisability of our results for a wider range of case studies of grammatical constructions and grammatical variation and change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T03:29:48Z)
• From Babbling to Fluency: Evaluating the Evolution of Language Models in Terms of Human Language Acquisition [6.617999710257379]
  We propose a three-stage framework to assess the abilities of LMs. We evaluate the generative capacities of LMs using methods from linguistic research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T06:31:49Z)
• SINC: Self-Supervised In-Context Learning for Vision-Language Tasks [64.44336003123102]
  We propose a framework to enable in-context learning in large language models. A meta-model can learn on self-supervised prompts consisting of tailored demonstrations. Experiments show that SINC outperforms gradient-based methods in various vision-language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T08:33:08Z)
• Extending an Event-type Ontology: Adding Verbs and Classes Using Fine-tuned LLMs Suggestions [0.0]
  We have investigated the use of advanced machine learning methods for pre-annotating data for a lexical extension task. We have examined the correlation of the automatic scores with the human annotation. While the correlation turned out to be strong, its influence on the annotation proper is modest due to its near linearity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T14:57:47Z)
• Syntax and Semantics Meet in the "Middle": Probing the Syntax-Semantics Interface of LMs Through Agentivity [68.8204255655161]
  We present the semantic notion of agentivity as a case study for probing such interactions. This suggests LMs may potentially serve as more useful tools for linguistic annotation, theory testing, and discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T16:24:01Z)
• Are Large Language Models Robust Coreference Resolvers? [17.60248310475889]
  We show that prompting for coreference can outperform current unsupervised coreference systems. Further investigations reveal that instruction-tuned LMs generalize surprisingly well across domains, languages, and time periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T19:38:28Z)
• Beyond Contrastive Learning: A Variational Generative Model for Multilingual Retrieval [109.62363167257664]
  We propose a generative model for learning multilingual text embeddings. Our model operates on parallel data in $N$ languages. We evaluate this method on a suite of tasks including semantic similarity, bitext mining, and cross-lingual question retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T02:41:40Z)
• BenchCLAMP: A Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Syntactic and Semantic Parsing [55.058258437125524]
  We introduce BenchCLAMP, a Benchmark to evaluate Constrained LAnguage Model Parsing. We benchmark eight language models, including two GPT-3 variants available only through an API. Our experiments show that encoder-decoder pretrained language models can achieve similar performance or surpass state-of-the-art methods for syntactic and semantic parsing when the model output is constrained to be valid.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T18:34:11Z)
• SLUE: New Benchmark Tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation on Natural Speech [44.68649535280397]
  We propose a suite of benchmark tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation (SLUE) SLUE consists of limited-size labeled training sets and corresponding evaluation sets. We present the first phase of the SLUE benchmark suite, consisting of named entity recognition, sentiment analysis, and ASR on the corresponding datasets. We provide new transcriptions and annotations on subsets of the VoxCeleb and VoxPopuli datasets, evaluation metrics and results for baseline models, and an open-source toolkit to reproduce the baselines and evaluate new models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T18:59:23Z)
• Sentiment analysis in tweets: an assessment study from classical to modern text representation models [59.107260266206445]
  Short texts published on Twitter have earned significant attention as a rich source of information. Their inherent characteristics, such as the informal, and noisy linguistic style, remain challenging to many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This study fulfils an assessment of existing language models in distinguishing the sentiment expressed in tweets by using a rich collection of 22 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T21:05:28Z)
• GATE: Graph Attention Transformer Encoder for Cross-lingual Relation and Event Extraction [107.8262586956778]
  We introduce graph convolutional networks (GCNs) with universal dependency parses to learn language-agnostic sentence representations. GCNs struggle to model words with long-range dependencies or are not directly connected in the dependency tree. We propose to utilize the self-attention mechanism to learn the dependencies between words with different syntactic distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T20:30:35Z)
• Grounded Compositional Outputs for Adaptive Language Modeling [59.02706635250856]
  A language model's vocabulary$-$typically selected before training and permanently fixed later$-$affects its size. We propose a fully compositional output embedding layer for language models. To our knowledge, the result is the first word-level language model with a size that does not depend on the training vocabulary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T07:21:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.