Read This Paper to Get $50 Million:* An Analysis of Mobile Messaging Scams Using Reddit Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16656v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 21:50:21 GMT
• Title: Read This Paper to Get $50 Million:* An Analysis of Mobile Messaging Scams Using Reddit Data
• Abstract summary: This study examines trends in mobile messaging scams and testing the effectiveness of commercial and open-source detection tools.<n>We collect and measure a dataset of 175,430 user-reported mobile messaging scams from Reddit between June 2020 and December 2025.<n>While reply-based scams constitute only 50% of our dataset, their compound annual growth rate (99.98%) is nearly twice that of click-based scams.
• Score: 14.045441992987401
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Mobile messaging scams--fraudulent messages delivered over SMS and other mobile applications--have become a persistent and evolving security threat, yet the attributes underlying these campaigns remain unclear. This study seeks to address this gap by examining trends in mobile messaging scams and testing the effectiveness of commercial and open-source off-the-shelf detection tools. We characterize mobile messaging scam operations, focusing on how phone numbers, URLs, and text content are used across campaigns. To achieve this objective, we collect and measure a dataset of 175,430 user-reported mobile messaging scams from Reddit between June 2020 and December 2025. While reply-based scams constitute only 50% of our dataset, their compound annual growth rate (99.98%) is nearly twice that of click-based scams (57.29%). Critically, reply-based scams also show the lowest detector performance--despite identifiable similarities in text content and phone number origin within categories--indicating that current off-the-shelf tools are ineffective. These results suggest that further development of detectors is necessary to defend against this rapidly changing ecosystem. By examining a range of message attributes, this work provides new insights into mobile messaging scams, informing the design of more targeted and robust detection methods.

Related papers

• Who Falls for SMiSh? Learning Through Survey Data Where to Best Target Awareness Training for Mobile Messaging Attacks [2.3714616729769724]
  One such scam, known as SMiShing (or smishing) after Short Message Service (SMS), involves fraudsters sending phishing links via mobile texts.<n>Despite the prevalence of SMiShing, there is a lack of data on who is most vulnerable to these attacks.<n>Our findings indicate that younger individuals and college students are particularly vulnerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T15:07:17Z)
• An Overview of 7726 User Reports: Uncovering SMS Scams and Scammer Strategies [4.560263516804933]
  We find 89.16% of user reports comprise text messages, followed by reports of suspicious calls and URLs.<n>We identify 35.12% of the unique text messages reported by users as spam, while 40.27% are scam text messages.<n>Our paper classifies the identified scam text messages into 12 scam types, of which the most popular is 'wrong number' scams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T11:19:01Z)
• (Blind) Users Really Do Heed Aural Telephone Scam Warnings [42.93674984678535]
  We explore how two groups of individuals, legally blind (n=36) and sighted ones (n=36) react to aural telephone scam warnings in naturalistic settings.<n>We developed an aural variant of telephone scam warnings and tested them in three conditions: baseline (no warning), short warning, and contextual warning that preceded the scam's content.<n>Both the legally blind and the sighted participants found the contextual warnings as powerful usable security cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T09:47:38Z)
• Characterizing Robocalls with Multiple Vantage Points [50.423738777985314]
  We show that unsolicited calls are in slow decline, though complaints and call volumes remain high. We find that robocallers have managed to adapt to STIR/SHAKEN, a mandatory call authentication scheme. In total, our findings highlight the most promising directions for future efforts to characterize and stop telephone spam.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T18:54:12Z)
• Combating Phone Scams with LLM-based Detection: Where Do We Stand? [1.8979188847659796]
  This research explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) to provide detection of fraudulent phone calls. LLMs-based detectors can identify potential scams as they occur, offering immediate protection to users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T02:14:30Z)
• Jäger: Automated Telephone Call Traceback [45.67265362470739]
  We introduce J"ager, a distributed secure call traceback system. J"ager can trace a call in a few seconds, even with partial deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T16:09:28Z)
• SpamDam: Towards Privacy-Preserving and Adversary-Resistant SMS Spam Detection [2.0355793807035094]
  SpamDam is a SMS spam detection framework designed to overcome key challenges in detecting and understanding SMS spam. We have compiled over 76K SMS spam messages from Twitter and Weibo between 2018 and 2023, forming the largest dataset of its kind. We have rigorously tested the adversarial robustness of SMS spam detection models, introducing the novel reverse backdoor attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T06:07:10Z)
• A Quantitative Study of SMS Phishing Detection [0.0]
  We conducted an online survey on smishing detection with 187 participants. We presented them with 16 SMS screenshots and evaluated how different factors affect their decision making process in smishing detection. We found that participants had more difficulty identifying real messages from fake ones, with an accuracy of 67.1% with fake messages and 43.6% with real messages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T17:56:42Z)
• ManiTweet: A New Benchmark for Identifying Manipulation of News on Social Media [74.93847489218008]
  We present a novel task, identifying manipulation of news on social media, which aims to detect manipulation in social media posts and identify manipulated or inserted information.<n>To study this task, we have proposed a data collection schema and curated a dataset called ManiTweet, consisting of 3.6K pairs of tweets and corresponding articles.<n>Our analysis demonstrates that this task is highly challenging, with large language models (LLMs) yielding unsatisfactory performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:40:07Z)
• Verifying the Robustness of Automatic Credibility Assessment [50.55687778699995]
  We show that meaning-preserving changes in input text can mislead the models. We also introduce BODEGA: a benchmark for testing both victim models and attack methods on misinformation detection tasks. Our experimental results show that modern large language models are often more vulnerable to attacks than previous, smaller solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T16:11:47Z)
• Countering Malicious Content Moderation Evasion in Online Social Networks: Simulation and Detection of Word Camouflage [64.78260098263489]
  Twisting and camouflaging keywords are among the most used techniques to evade platform content moderation systems. This article contributes significantly to countering malicious information by developing multilingual tools to simulate and detect new methods of evasion of content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-27T16:08:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.