Taming "Zombie'' Agents: A Markov State-Aware Framework for Resilient Multi-Agent Evolution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17348v1
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 09:38:18 GMT
- Title: Taming "Zombie'' Agents: A Markov State-Aware Framework for Resilient Multi-Agent Evolution
- Abstract summary: AgentRevive is a Markov state-aware framework for resilient multi-agent evolution.<n>Our approach dynamically manages agent collaboration through soft state transitions.<n>It significantly reduces token consumption through state-aware agent scheduling.
- Score: 50.50276752935017
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent advancements in LLM-based multi-agent systems have demonstrated remarkable collaborative capabilities across complex tasks. To improve overall efficiency, existing methods often rely on aggressive graph evolution among agents (e.g., node or edge pruning), which risks prematurely discarding valuable agents due to transient issues such as hallucinations or temporary knowledge gaps. However, such hard pruning overlooks the potential for ``zombie'' agents to recover and contribute in subsequent discussion rounds. In this paper, we propose AgentRevive, a Markov state-aware framework for resilient multi-agent evolution. Our approach dynamically manages agent collaboration through soft state transitions, implemented via two key components: (1) State-Aware Policy Learning: Agent states are divided into ``Active'', ``Standby'', and ``Terminated'' states, selectively propagating messages based on agent memory. The policy employs a risk estimator to optimize agent state transitions by assessing hallucination risk, minimizing the influence of unreliable nodes while safeguarding valuable ones. (2) State-Aware Edge Optimization: Subgraph edges are pruned according to states learned from the policy, permanently removing ``Terminated'' nodes and retaining ``Standby'' nodes for subsequent rounds to assess their potential future contributions. Extensive experiments on general reasoning, domain-specific, and hallucination challenge tasks show that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines and significantly reduces token consumption through state-aware agent scheduling.
Related papers
- Self-evolving LLM agents with in-distribution Optimization [60.05867547965365]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as powerful controllers for interactive agents in complex environments.<n>We propose Q-Evolve, a self-evolving framework for LLM agents that unifies automatic process-reward labeling and policy learning.<n>We evaluate our method on AlfWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld, showing Q-Evolve outperforms strong baselines in sample efficiency, robustness, and overall task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-05T15:09:52Z) - RetroAgent: From Solving to Evolving via Retrospective Dual Intrinsic Feedback [54.39884046754265]
RetroAgent is an online RL framework that enables agents to master complex interactive environments.<n>Our experiments show that RetroAgent achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T16:23:33Z) - NAAMSE: Framework for Evolutionary Security Evaluation of Agents [1.0131895986034316]
We propose NAAMSE, an evolutionary framework that reframes agent security evaluation as a feedback-driven optimization problem.<n>Our system employs a single autonomous agent that orchestrates a lifecycle of genetic prompt mutation, hierarchical corpus exploration, and asymmetric behavioral scoring.<n>Experiments on Gemini 2.5 Flash demonstrate that evolutionary mutation systematically amplifies vulnerabilities missed by one-shot methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-07T06:13:02Z) - Agent-Dice: Disentangling Knowledge Updates via Geometric Consensus for Agent Continual Learning [41.461840578204956]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents learn new tasks without catastrophic forgetting.<n>Agent-Dice is a parameter fusion framework based on directional consensus evaluation.<n>Experiments on GUI agents and tool-use agent domains demonstrate that Agent-Dice exhibits outstanding continual learning performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T06:43:50Z) - Discovering Coordinated Joint Options via Inter-Agent Relative Dynamics [13.0114299827121]
In multi-agent settings, the exponential growth of the joint state space with the number of agents makes coordinated behaviours even more valuable.<n>Existing multi-agent option discovery methods often sacrifice coordination by producing loosely coupled or fully independent behaviours.<n>We propose a joint-state abstraction that compresses the state space while preserving the information necessary to discover strongly coordinated behaviours.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-31T12:39:22Z) - MemoryGraft: Persistent Compromise of LLM Agents via Poisoned Experience Retrieval [5.734678752740074]
MemoryGraft is a novel indirect injection attack that compromises agent behavior not through immediate jailbreaks, but by implanting malicious successful experiences into the agent's long-term memory.<n>We demonstrate that an attacker who can supply benign ingestion-level artifacts that the agent reads during execution can induce it to construct a poisoned RAG store.<n>When the agent later encounters semantically similar tasks, union retrieval over lexical templates and embedding similarity reliably surfaces these grafted memories, and the agent adopts the embedded unsafe patterns, leading to persistent behavioral drift across sessions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-18T08:34:40Z) - SCOPE: Prompt Evolution for Enhancing Agent Effectiveness [53.75986399936395]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in environments that generate massive, dynamic contexts.<n>While agents have access to this context, their static prompts lack the mechanisms to manage it effectively.<n>We introduce textbfSCOPE (Self-evolving Context Optimization via Prompt Evolution)<n>We propose a Dual-Stream mechanism that balances tactical specificity (resolving immediate errors) with strategic generality (evolving long-term principles)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-17T12:25:05Z) - AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases [73.04652687616286]
We propose AgentPoison, the first backdoor attack targeting generic and RAG-based LLM agents by poisoning their long-term memory or RAG knowledge base.
Unlike conventional backdoor attacks, AgentPoison requires no additional model training or fine-tuning.
On each agent, AgentPoison achieves an average attack success rate higher than 80% with minimal impact on benign performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T17:59:47Z) - Plan Better Amid Conservatism: Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement
Learning with Actor Rectification [74.10976684469435]
offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms can be transferred to multi-agent settings directly.
We propose a simple yet effective method, Offline Multi-Agent RL with Actor Rectification (OMAR), to tackle this critical challenge.
OMAR significantly outperforms strong baselines with state-of-the-art performance in multi-agent continuous control benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-22T13:27:42Z) - On the Use and Misuse of Absorbing States in Multi-agent Reinforcement
Learning [55.95253619768565]
Current MARL algorithms assume that the number of agents within a group remains fixed throughout an experiment.
In many practical problems, an agent may terminate before their teammates.
We present a novel architecture for an existing state-of-the-art MARL algorithm which uses attention instead of a fully connected layer with absorbing states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T23:45:08Z) - Simple Agent, Complex Environment: Efficient Reinforcement Learning with
Agent State [35.69801203107371]
We design a simple reinforcement learning agent that can operate in any environment.
The agent maintains only visitation counts and value estimates for each agent-state-action pair.
There is no further dependence on the number of environment states or mixing times associated with other policies or statistics of history.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-10T04:53:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.