Episodic-Semantic Memory Architecture for Long-Horizon Scientific Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17625v1
• Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 19:44:24 GMT
• Title: Episodic-Semantic Memory Architecture for Long-Horizon Scientific Agents
• Abstract summary: We evaluate a Dual Process Memory Architecture that decouples immediate episodic needs (constant 10-message window) from long-term consolidated knowledge (growing at approximately 3 tokens/message)<n>Our system maintains 70-85% accuracy with 1-2 second latency using fewer tokens (45,434 vs 120,000+ limit)<n>We identify a "Sim-to-Real" gap where synthetic tests maintain constant memory but realistic exhibit linear growth (about 3 tokens/message)
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into persistent scientific collaborators, context window saturation has emerged as a critical bottleneck. Scientific workflows involving iterative data analysis and hypothesis refinement rapidly saturate even extended contexts with dense technical content, while monolithic approaches suffer from quadratic cost scaling and cognitive degradation. We evaluate a Dual Process Memory Architecture that decouples immediate episodic needs (constant 10-message window) from long-term consolidated knowledge (growing at approximately 3 tokens/message). Unlike prior social agent memory systems, our domain-specific consolidation addresses contradictory parameter evolution, multi-hop reasoning across experimental phases, and precise technical fact retention. Through large-scale evaluation spanning 15,000 messages with cross-model validation across six LLMs from three families (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), totaling 1,440 queries, we establish three key findings. First, while full-context models fail at 10,000 messages due to context overflow, our system maintains 70-85% accuracy with 1-2 second latency using 62% fewer tokens (45,434 vs 120,000+ limit). Second, cross-model validation reveals architecture-level trade-offs independent of specific LLMs: Dual Process excels at numeric/temporal queries (65-90% accuracy) while RAG excels at historical retrieval (60-85%), suggesting complementary deployment strategies. Third, we identify a "Sim-to-Real" gap where synthetic tests maintain constant memory but realistic workflows exhibit linear growth (about 3 tokens/message), with consolidation quality emerging as the primary scalability bottleneck. The architecture successfully manages profiles with 14,000+ scientific facts (125k tokens), demonstrating that domain-specific memory consolidation enables sustained operation beyond full-context limits.

Related papers

• Omni-SimpleMem: Autoresearch-Guided Discovery of Lifelong Multimodal Agent Memory [76.63021613850093]
  We deploy an autonomous research pipeline to discover Omni-SimpleMem, a unified multimodal memory framework for lifelong AI agents.<n>System achieves state-of-the-art on two benchmarks, improving F1 by +411% on LoCoMo and +214% on Mem-Gallery.<n>We provide a taxonomy of six discovery types and identify four properties that make multimodal memory particularly suited for autoresearch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T15:06:23Z)
• Mitigating LLM Hallucinations through Domain-Grounded Tiered Retrieval [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented fluency but remain susceptible to "hallucinations"<n>We propose a tiered retrieval and verification architecture designed to intercept factual inaccuracies by shifting LLMs from pattern-matchers to verified truth-seekers.<n>System was evaluated across 650 queries from five diverse benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T15:59:30Z)
• Bridging Temporal and Textual Modalities: A Multimodal Framework for Automated Cloud Failure Root Cause Analysis [0.0]
  This paper presents a diagnostic framework that harmonizes time-series representations with pretrained language model embedding spaces.<n>Our framework achieves leading performance, reaching 48.75% diagnostic accuracy with notable improvements on scenarios involving compound failure modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T08:20:44Z)
• Encyclo-K: Evaluating LLMs with Dynamically Composed Knowledge Statements [78.87065404966002]
  Existing benchmarks predominantly curate questions at the question level.<n>We propose Encyclo-K, a statement-based benchmark that rethinks benchmark construction from the ground up.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-31T13:55:54Z)
• BRIDGE: Building Representations In Domain Guided Program Verification [67.36686119518441]
  BRIDGE decomposes verification into three interconnected domains: Code, Specifications, and Proofs.<n>We show that this approach substantially improves both accuracy and efficiency beyond standard error feedback methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T06:39:19Z)
• ExplicitLM: Decoupling Knowledge from Parameters via Explicit Memory Banks [4.099810580680816]
  Large language models suffer from knowledge staleness and lack of interpretability due to implicit knowledge storage.<n>We propose ExplicitLM, a novel architecture featuring a million-scale external memory bank storing human-readable knowledge as token sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T13:53:19Z)
• MM-HELIX: Boosting Multimodal Long-Chain Reflective Reasoning with Holistic Platform and Adaptive Hybrid Policy Optimization [103.74675519953898]
  Long-chain reflective reasoning is a prerequisite for solving complex real-world problems.<n>We build a benchmark consisting 1,260 samples of 42 challenging synthetic tasks.<n>We generate post-training data and explore learning paradigms for exploiting such data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:53:58Z)
• Eigen-1: Adaptive Multi-Agent Refinement with Monitor-Based RAG for Scientific Reasoning [53.45095336430027]
  We develop a unified framework that combines implicit retrieval and structured collaboration.<n>On Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Bio/Chem Gold, our framework achieves 48.3% accuracy.<n>Results on SuperGPQA and TRQA confirm robustness across domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T14:05:55Z)
• Evaluating the Use of LLMs for Documentation to Code Traceability [3.076436880934678]
  Large Language Models can establish trace links between various software documentation and source code.<n>We create two novel datasets from two open-source projects (Unity Catalog and Crawl4AI)<n>Results show that the best-performing LLM achieves F1-scores of 79.4% and 80.4% across the two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T16:18:53Z)
• MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents [84.62985963113245]
  We introduce MEM1, an end-to-end reinforcement learning framework that enables agents to operate with constant memory across long multi-turn tasks.<n>At each turn, MEM1 updates a compact shared internal state that jointly supports memory consolidation and reasoning.<n>We show that MEM1-7B improves performance by 3.5x while reducing memory usage by 3.7x compared to Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct on a 16-objective multi-hop QA task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T19:44:46Z)
• Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory [0.5584627289325719]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable prowess in generating contextually coherent responses.<n>But their fixed context windows pose fundamental challenges for maintaining consistency over prolonged multi-session dialogues.<n>We introduce Mem0, a scalable memory-centric architecture that addresses this issue by dynamically extracting, consolidating, and retrieving salient information from ongoing conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T01:46:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.