MARQUIS: A Three-Stage Pipeline for Video Retrieval-Augmented Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17640v1
• Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 20:19:04 GMT
• Title: MARQUIS: A Three-Stage Pipeline for Video Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-augmented generation from videos requires systems to retrieve relevant audiovisual evidence from large corpora and synthesize it into coherent, attributed text.<n>We present MARQUIS: a three-stage pipeline that addresses these limitations through query expansion, fusion, and reranking.<n>For article generation, ITER-QA-BASE improves average human score from 3.09 to 3.83 over the CAG baseline, while MARQUIS-RLM achieves a human score of 3.30 and the strongest citation recall among non-QA systems.
• Score: 64.33427079838602
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation from videos requires systems to retrieve relevant audiovisual evidence from large corpora and synthesize it into coherent, attributed text. Current approaches struggle at both ends: retrieval methods fail on complex, multi-faceted queries that cannot be captured by a single embedding, while generation methods lack the high-level reasoning needed to synthesize across multiple videos and face memory constraints over long, multi-video contexts. We present MARQUIS: a three-stage pipeline that addresses these limitations through (1) query expansion, fusion, and reranking, (2) calibrated structured evidence extraction, and (3) article generation from extracted evidence, optionally controlled by an RLM. On the MAGMaR2026 shared task, we improve retrieval performance from 0.195 to 0.759 (nDCG@10). For article generation, ITER-QA-BASE improves average human score from 3.09 to 3.83 over the CAG baseline, while MARQUIS-RLM achieves a human score of 3.30 and the strongest citation recall among non-QA systems.

Related papers

• Multimodal Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Scientific Document Understanding using Open-Source SLMs [45.88028371034407]
  Large Language Models tend to hallucinate when answering domain-specific ques tions from scientific documents without prior fine-tuning.<n>This paper presents an Advanced Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation system that aims to solve those challenges.<n>Results demonstrate a 157% improvement in retrieval quality over a Naive-RAG baseline, with only 50 ms additional la tency, while Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct achieved results comparable to cloud-based models in BERTScore.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T08:32:09Z)
• Video-MME-v2: Towards the Next Stage in Benchmarks for Comprehensive Video Understanding [98.3098451637867]
  Video-MME-v2 is a comprehensive benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the robustness and faithfulness of video understanding.<n>To guarantee data quality, Video-MME-v2 is constructed through a rigorously controlled human annotation pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T17:59:56Z)
• From BM25 to Corrective RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies for Text-and-Table Documents [0.0]
  We benchmark ten retrieval strategies spanning sparse, dense, hybrid fusion, cross-encoder reranking, query expansion, index augmentation, and adaptive retrieval.<n>We evaluate retrieval quality via Recall@k, MRR, and nDCG, and end-to-end generation quality via Number Match.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T07:53:40Z)
• Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z)
• StratRAG: A Multi-Hop Retrieval Evaluation Dataset for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [0.0]
  StratRAG is an evaluation dataset for benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems.<n>It comprises 2,200 examples across three question types -- bridge, comparison, and yes-no -- each paired with a pool of 15 candidate documents.<n>We benchmark three retrieval strategies -- BM25, dense retrieval, and hybrid fusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T20:08:06Z)
• RANKVIDEO: Reasoning Reranking for Text-to-Video Retrieval [99.33724613432922]
  We introduce RANKVIDEO, a reasoning-based reranker for video retrieval.<n>RANKVIDEO explicitly reasons over query-video pairs using video content to assess relevance.<n> Experiments on the large-scale MultiVENT 2.0 benchmark demonstrate that RANKVIDEO consistently improves retrieval performance within a two-stage framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:40:37Z)
• MARAG-R1: Beyond Single Retriever via Reinforcement-Learned Multi-Tool Agentic Retrieval [50.30107119622642]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at reasoning and generation but are inherently limited by static pretraining data.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this issue by grounding LLMs in external knowledge.<n>MarAG-R1 is a reinforcement-learned multi-tool RAG framework that enables LLMs to dynamically coordinate multiple retrieval mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T15:51:39Z)
• How Does Generative Retrieval Scale to Millions of Passages? [68.98628807288972]
  We conduct the first empirical study of generative retrieval techniques across various corpus scales. We scale generative retrieval to millions of passages with a corpus of 8.8M passages and evaluating model sizes up to 11B parameters. While generative retrieval is competitive with state-of-the-art dual encoders on small corpora, scaling to millions of passages remains an important and unsolved challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T17:33:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.