Agent Bazaar: Enabling Economic Alignment in Multi-Agent Marketplaces

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17698v1
• Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 23:36:55 GMT
• Title: Agent Bazaar: Enabling Economic Alignment in Multi-Agent Marketplaces
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Agent Bazaar, a multi-agent simulation framework for evaluating Economic Alignment.<n>We identify two failure modes: Algorithmic Instability in a B2C market ("The Crash"), where firms amplify price volatility until the market collapses, and Sybil Deception in a C2C market ("The Lemon Market"), where a single deceptive agent floods the market with fraudulent listings, eroding trust and consumer welfare.<n>We propose economically aligned harnesses, Stabilizing Firms and Skeptical Guardians, that improve outcomes but remain fragile under harder market conditions.
• Score: 13.796920626646964
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) as autonomous economic agents introduces systemic risks that extend beyond individual capability failures. As agents transition to directly interacting with marketplaces, their collective behavior can amplify volatility and mask deception at scale. We introduce the Agent Bazaar, a multi-agent simulation framework for evaluating Economic Alignment, the capacity of agentic systems to preserve market stability and integrity. We identify two failure modes: (1) Algorithmic Instability in a B2C market ("The Crash"), where firms amplify price volatility until the market collapses, and (2) Sybil Deception in a C2C market ("The Lemon Market"), where a single deceptive agent controlling multiple coordinated seller identities floods the market with fraudulent listings, eroding trust and consumer welfare. We evaluate frontier and open-weight models across both scenarios and find that models largely fail to self-regulate, with failure severity varying by model rather than by size. We propose economically aligned harnesses, Stabilizing Firms and Skeptical Guardians, that improve outcomes but remain fragile under harder market conditions. To close this gap, we train agents with REINFORCE++ using an adaptive curriculum, producing a 9B model that outperforms all evaluated frontier and open-weight models. We propose the Economic Alignment Score (EAS), a 4-component scalar metric aggregating stability, integrity, welfare, and profitability, enabling direct cross-model comparison. Our results show that economic alignment is orthogonal to general capability and can be directly trained with targeted RL.

Related papers

• Competitive Market Behavior of LLMs [10.688937502565592]
  We replace human subjects with large language models (LLMs) to test market mechanisms designed for humans.<n>We find that markets populated by LLM agents exhibit slower or no convergence towards market equilibrium.<n>We also run a lexical analysis of Chain-of-Thought traces generated by the agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-02T13:24:42Z)
• Formal Mechanisms for Market Stability in Self-Interested Agent Societies: A Marketplace Simulation Study [3.2232118075036573]
  Self-interested agents, left unconstrained, tend toward defection in repeated social dilemmas, causing cooperative gains from trade to collapse.<n>This paper investigates what formal mechanisms, layered on top of unrestricted communication, are sufficient for a society of such agents to maintain market stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-09T16:21:16Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• Why Keep Your Doubts to Yourself? Trading Visual Uncertainties in Multi-Agent Bandit Systems [21.356119126402902]
  We introduce Agora, a framework that reframes coordination as a decentralized market for uncertainty.<n>A market-aware broker, extending Thompson Sampling, initiates collaboration and guides the system toward cost-efficient equilibria.<n>Results establish market-based coordination as a principled and scalable paradigm for building economically viable visual intelligence systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T17:58:53Z)
• Agentic Confidence Calibration [67.50096917021521]
  Holistic Trajectory (HTC) is a novel diagnostic framework for AI agents.<n>HTC consistently surpasses strong baselines in both calibration and discrimination.<n>HTC provides interpretability by revealing the signals behind failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T09:08:25Z)
• Bayesian Robust Financial Trading with Adversarial Synthetic Market Data [15.993346478707686]
  Algorithmic trading relies on machine learning models to make trading decisions.<n>Despite strong in-sample performance, these models often degrade when confronted with evolving real-world market regimes.<n>We propose a Bayesian Robust Framework that integrates a macro-conditioned generative model with robust policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T13:15:46Z)
• Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Market Making: Competition without Collusion [6.598173855286935]
  We propose a hierarchical multi-agent reinforcement learning framework to study algorithmic collusion in market making.<n>The framework includes a self-interested market maker (AgentA), which is trained in an uncertain environment shaped by an adversary.<n>We show that adaptive incentive control supports more sustainable strategic co-existence in heterogeneous agent environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T20:07:47Z)
• Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets [74.91125572848439]
  We study two-sided agentic marketplaces where Assistant agents represent consumers and Service agents represent competing businesses.<n>This environment enables us to study key market dynamics: the utility agents achieve, behavioral biases, vulnerability to manipulation, and how search mechanisms shape market outcomes.<n>Our experiments show that frontier models can approach optimal welfare-- but only under ideal search conditions. Performance degrades sharply with scale, and all models exhibit severe first-proposal bias, creating 10-30x advantages for response speed over quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T18:35:59Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning in Finance: Modeling Market Impact with Elliptic Uncertainty Sets [57.179679246370114]
  In financial applications, reinforcement learning (RL) agents are commonly trained on historical data, where their actions do not influence prices.<n>During deployment, these agents trade in live markets where their own transactions can shift asset prices, a phenomenon known as market impact.<n>Traditional robust RL approaches address this model misspecification by optimizing the worst-case performance over a set of uncertainties.<n>We develop a novel class of elliptic uncertainty sets, enabling efficient and tractable robust policy evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T18:22:25Z)
• MARS: A Meta-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning Framework for Risk-Aware Multi-Agent Portfolio Management [7.740995234462868]
  Reinforcement Learning has shown significant promise in automated portfolio management.<n>We propose Meta-controlled Agents for a Risk-aware System (MARS)<n>MARS employs a Heterogeneous Agent Ensemble where each agent possesses a unique, intrinsic risk profile.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T03:23:41Z)
• Shifting Power: Leveraging LLMs to Simulate Human Aversion in ABMs of Bilateral Financial Exchanges, A bond market study [15.379345372327375]
  TRIBE is an agent-based model augmented with a large language model (LLM) to simulate human-like decision-making in trading environments.<n>We show that incorporating human-like variability shifts power dynamics towards clients and can disproportionately affect the entire system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-01T03:15:13Z)
• Finding General Equilibria in Many-Agent Economic Simulations Using Deep Reinforcement Learning [72.23843557783533]
  We show that deep reinforcement learning can discover stable solutions that are epsilon-Nash equilibria for a meta-game over agent types. Our approach is more flexible and does not need unrealistic assumptions, e.g., market clearing. We demonstrate our approach in real-business-cycle models, a representative family of DGE models, with 100 worker-consumers, 10 firms, and a government who taxes and redistributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-03T17:00:17Z)
• ERMAS: Becoming Robust to Reward Function Sim-to-Real Gaps in Multi-Agent Simulations [110.72725220033983]
  Epsilon-Robust Multi-Agent Simulation (ERMAS) is a framework for learning AI policies that are robust to such multiagent sim-to-real gaps. ERMAS learns tax policies that are robust to changes in agent risk aversion, improving social welfare by up to 15% in complextemporal simulations. In particular, ERMAS learns tax policies that are robust to changes in agent risk aversion, improving social welfare by up to 15% in complextemporal simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T04:32:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.