Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Synthetic Clinical Notes Rephrased by LLMs at Million-Note Scale

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17775v1
• Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 02:49:04 GMT
• Title: Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Synthetic Clinical Notes Rephrased by LLMs at Million-Note Scale
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can generate or synthesize clinical text for a wide range of applications.<n>In this study, we aim to conduct a systematic evaluation of LLM-generated clinical text rephrased from MIMIC databases at million-note scale.
• Score: 1.1341973720475316
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can generate or synthesize clinical text for a wide range of applications, from improving clinical documentation to augmenting clinical text analytics. Yet evaluations typically focus on a narrow aspect -- such as similarity or utility comparisons -- even though these aspects are complementary and best viewed in parallel. In this study, we aim to conduct a systematic evaluation of LLM-generated clinical text, which includes intrinsic, extrinsic, and factuality evaluations of synthetic clinical notes rephrased from MIMIC databases at million-note scale. Our analysis demonstrates that synthetic notes preserve core clinical information and predictive utility for coarse-grained tasks despite substantial linguistic changes, but lose fine-grained details for task like ICD coding. We show this loss of detail can be substantially mitigated by rephrasing notes by chunks rather than by the whole note, but at the cost of reduced factual precision under incomplete context. Through fact-checking and error analysis, we further find that synthesis errors are dominated by misinterpretation of clinical context, alongside temporal confusion, measurement errors, and fabricated claims. Finally, we show that the synthetic notes -- despite their task-agnostic nature -- can effectively augment task-specific training for rare ICD codes.

Related papers

• Beyond Scalar Scores: Exploring LLM-based Metrics for Clinical Significance Evaluation in Radiology Reports [49.5225801722164]
  Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar.<n>We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T08:10:30Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Post-Discharge Clinical Action Extraction [0.0]
  This paper evaluates zero-shot and few-shot large language models (LLMs) for safety-critical clinical action extraction using the CLIP discharge-note dataset.<n>We introduce a two-stage extraction framework that decomposes discharge notes, that are written in narrative form, into fine-grained, explicitly actionable clinical tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T13:05:07Z)
• CT-FineBench: A Diagnostic Fidelity Benchmark for Fine-Grained Evaluation of CT Report Generation [51.11942945171396]
  Conventional evaluation metrics offer only coarse measures of lexical overlap or entity matching.<n>We propose CT-FineBench, a benchmark built from CT-RATE and Merlin to evaluate the fine-grained factual consistency of CT reports.<n>Our benchmark is constructed through a meticulous, Question-Answering (QA) based process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T03:32:46Z)
• Toward Reliable Clinical Coding with Language Models: Verification and Lightweight Adaptation [3.952186976672079]
  We show that lightweight interventions, including prompt engineering and small-scale fine-tuning, can improve accuracy without the computational overhead of search-based methods.<n>To address hierarchically near-miss errors, we introduce clinical code verification as both a standalone task and a pipeline component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T23:50:58Z)
• FactEHR: A Dataset for Evaluating Factuality in Clinical Notes Using LLMs [3.919419934122265]
  We present FactEHR, an NLI dataset consisting of document fact decompositions for 2,168 clinical notes spanning four types from three hospital systems.<n>We assess the generated facts on different axes, from entailment evaluation of LLMs to a qualitative analysis.<n>The results underscore the need for better LLM capabilities to support factual verification in clinical text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T00:07:05Z)
• Synthetic4Health: Generating Annotated Synthetic Clinical Letters [6.822926897514792]
  Since clinical letters contain sensitive information, clinical-related datasets can not be widely applied in model training, medical research, and teaching. This work aims to generate reliable, various, and de-identified synthetic clinical letters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-14T18:15:07Z)
• Attribute Structuring Improves LLM-Based Evaluation of Clinical Text Summaries [56.31117605097345]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to generate accurate clinical text summaries, but still struggle with issues regarding grounding and evaluation.<n>Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using Attribute Structuring (AS), which structures the summary evaluation process.<n>AS consistently improves the correspondence between human annotations and automated metrics in clinical text summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T21:59:03Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• Self-supervised Answer Retrieval on Clinical Notes [68.87777592015402]
  We introduce CAPR, a rule-based self-supervision objective for training Transformer language models for domain-specific passage matching. We apply our objective in four Transformer-based architectures: Contextual Document Vectors, Bi-, Poly- and Cross-encoders. We report that CAPR outperforms strong baselines in the retrieval of domain-specific passages and effectively generalizes across rule-based and human-labeled passages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T10:42:52Z)
• Benchmarking Automated Clinical Language Simplification: Dataset, Algorithm, and Evaluation [48.87254340298189]
  We construct a new dataset named MedLane to support the development and evaluation of automated clinical language simplification approaches. We propose a new model called DECLARE that follows the human annotation procedure and achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T06:09:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.