Babel: Jailbreaking Safety Attention via Obfuscation Distribution Optimized Sampling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17971v1
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 07:27:59 GMT
- Title: Babel: Jailbreaking Safety Attention via Obfuscation Distribution Optimized Sampling
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.<n>We propose Babel, an efficient black-box attack framework.<n>Babel achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates and superior query efficiency.
- Score: 21.801812957325662
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Despite rigorous safety alignment, Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. Existing black-box methods often rely on heuristic templates or exhaustive trials, lacking mechanistic interpretability and query efficiency. In this study, we investigate an intrinsic vulnerability in the safety mechanisms of LLMs, where safety alignment relies on a small set of sparsely distributed attention heads, leaving much of the representational space weakly monitored. We formalize this phenomenon with a mathematical jailbreaking model that characterizes the delicate boundary of effective text obfuscation and analytically explains observed jailbreak behaviors. Guided by this model, we propose Babel, an efficient black-box attack framework that exploits the identified safety gap through systematic obfuscation sampling with iterative, feedback-driven distribution refinement, enabling reliable and high-success jailbreak attacks without access to model internals. Comprehensive evaluations on frontier commercial models demonstrate that Babel achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates and superior query efficiency. Specifically, compared to state-of-the-art methods, Babel increases the attack success rate on GPT-4o from 41.33% to 82.67% and on Claude-3-5-haiku from 38.33% to 78.33% within an average of 40 queries, providing a robust red-teaming methodology for LLMs safety research.
Related papers
- Safety Targeted Embedding Exploit via Refinement [1.384477926572109]
We show that safety mechanisms aligned primarily on English cannot be assumed to generalize across multilingual inputs.<n>We introduce STEER, a gradient-guided attack that translates words into low-resource languages to suppress refusal while preserving harmful intent.<n>We argue that improving multilingual safety requires broader coverage during alignment and mechanisms that explicitly detect and abstain on out-of-distribution inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-02T08:17:57Z) - SoK: Robustness in Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks [18.3385249246391]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success but remain highly susceptible to jailbreak attacks.<n>Such attacks pose real-world risks, eroding safety, trust, and regulatory compliance in high-stakes applications.<n>We present a systematic taxonomy of jailbreak attacks and defenses and introduce Security Cube, a unified, multi-dimensional framework for comprehensive evaluation of these techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T15:53:17Z) - Jailbreaking Leaves a Trace: Understanding and Detecting Jailbreak Attacks from Internal Representations of Large Language Models [2.6140509675507384]
We study jailbreaking from both security and interpretability perspectives.<n>We propose a tensor-based latent representation framework that captures structure in hidden activations.<n>Our results provide evidence that jailbreak behavior is rooted in identifiable internal structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T02:43:17Z) - Attributing and Exploiting Safety Vectors through Global Optimization in Large Language Models [50.91504059485288]
We propose a framework that identifies safety-critical attention heads through global optimization over all heads simultaneously.<n>We develop a novel inference-time white-box jailbreak method that exploits the identified safety vectors through activation repatching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-22T09:32:43Z) - DiffuGuard: How Intrinsic Safety is Lost and Found in Diffusion Large Language Models [50.21378052667732]
We conduct an in-depth analysis of dLLM vulnerabilities to jailbreak attacks across two distinct dimensions: intra-step and inter-step dynamics.<n>We propose DiffuGuard, a training-free defense framework that addresses vulnerabilities through a dual-stage approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T05:17:10Z) - ARMOR: Aligning Secure and Safe Large Language Models via Meticulous Reasoning [64.32925552574115]
ARMOR is a large language model that analyzes jailbreak strategies and extracts the core intent.<n> ARMOR achieves state-of-the-art safety performance, with an average harmful rate of 0.002 and an attack success rate of 0.06 against advanced optimization-based jailbreaks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T09:05:54Z) - Exploring the Vulnerability of the Content Moderation Guardrail in Large Language Models via Intent Manipulation [29.8288014123234]
We investigate the vulnerability of intent-aware guardrails and demonstrate that large language models exhibit implicit intent detection capabilities.<n>We propose a two-stage intent-based prompt-refinement framework, IntentPrompt, that first transforms harmful inquiries into structured outlines and further reframes them into declarative-style narratives.<n>Our framework consistently outperforms several cutting-edge jailbreak methods and evades even advanced Intent Analysis (IA) and Chain-of-Thought (CoT)-based defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T06:47:32Z) - SafeDialBench: A Fine-Grained Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues with Diverse Jailbreak Attacks [90.41592442792181]
We propose a fine-grained benchmark SafeDialBench for evaluating the safety of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Specifically, we design a two-tier hierarchical safety taxonomy that considers 6 safety dimensions and generates more than 4000 multi-turn dialogues in both Chinese and English under 22 dialogue scenarios.<n> Notably, we construct an innovative assessment framework of LLMs, measuring capabilities in detecting, and handling unsafe information and maintaining consistency when facing jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T12:08:08Z) - xJailbreak: Representation Space Guided Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable LLM Jailbreaking [32.89084809038529]
Black-box jailbreak is an attack where crafted prompts bypass safety mechanisms in large language models.<n>We propose a novel black-box jailbreak method leveraging reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We introduce a comprehensive jailbreak evaluation framework incorporating keywords, intent matching, and answer validation to provide a more rigorous and holistic assessment of jailbreak success.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-28T06:07:58Z) - Layer-Level Self-Exposure and Patch: Affirmative Token Mitigation for Jailbreak Attack Defense [55.77152277982117]
We introduce Layer-AdvPatcher, a methodology designed to defend against jailbreak attacks.<n>We use an unlearning strategy to patch specific layers within large language models through self-augmented datasets.<n>Our framework reduces the harmfulness and attack success rate of jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-05T19:06:03Z) - Shaping the Safety Boundaries: Understanding and Defending Against Jailbreaks in Large Language Models [55.253208152184065]
Jailbreaking in Large Language Models (LLMs) is a major security concern as it can deceive LLMs to generate harmful text.<n>We conduct a detailed analysis of seven different jailbreak methods and find that disagreements stem from insufficient observation samples.<n>We propose a novel defense called textbfActivation Boundary Defense (ABD), which adaptively constrains the activations within the safety boundary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T14:18:39Z) - IDEATOR: Jailbreaking and Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models Using Themselves [70.43466586161345]
IDEATOR is a novel jailbreak method that autonomously generates malicious image-text pairs for black-box jailbreak attacks.<n>Our benchmark results on 11 recently releasedVLMs reveal significant gaps in safety alignment.<n>For instance, our challenge set ASRs of 46.31% on GPT-4o and 19.65% on Claude-3.5-Sonnet, underscoring the urgent need for stronger defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T07:15:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.