Generative AI and the Productivity Divide: Human-AI Complementarities in Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18143v1
• Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 09:50:05 GMT
• Title: Generative AI and the Productivity Divide: Human-AI Complementarities in Education
• Abstract summary: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming how firms create, process, and apply knowledge.<n>On average, GenAI access significantly increased task performance, but the distribution of gains was highly uneven.<n>High-AIC participants realized outsized gains; low-AIC participants saw limited or even negative marginal returns.
• Score: 2.2940141855172036
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming how firms create, process, and apply knowledge, yet little is known about the heterogeneity of its productivity effects across users. We report results from a randomized controlled experiment in which participants-analogs of early-career knowledge workers-were assigned to self-study a technical domain using either traditional resources or large-language-model (LLM) assistance. On average, GenAI access significantly increased task performance, but the distribution of gains was highly uneven. Improvements were not predicted by GPA or prior knowledge, but by \textit{AI Interaction Competence (AIC)} -- the ability to elicit, filter, and verify model outputs. High-AIC participants realized outsized gains; low-AIC participants saw limited or even negative marginal returns. A scaffolding intervention (conceptual maps) reduced outcome variance, indicating that standardized workflows can mitigate inequality in AI-mediated performance. We interpret these findings through the lens of human-AI complementarities: GenAI raises mean productivity while introducing a new axis of capability inequality. Managerially, firms should pair GenAI access with short AIC micro-training and simple standard operating procedures to capture value consistently and avoid uneven adoption outcomes.

Related papers

• Developers' Experience with Generative AI Beyond Productivity Assessment -- Insights from an Empirical Mixed-Methods Field Study [7.932998356208937]
  This paper investigates how professional developers engage with Generative AI (GenAI) in their natural work environment.<n>Results show developers are generally satisfied with GenAI, particularly for monotonous, repetitive, and structured tasks.<n>During development-heavy tasks, results indicate that perceived cognitive load arises from AI interaction, while perceived productivity depends on AI output quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T15:43:21Z)
• The GenAI Skill Bypass: Mapping Divergent Pathways of University Students and Staff AI Literacy [0.9039347265533652]
  Higher education institutions are increasingly expected to ensure that both students and staff develop Generative AI (GenAI)<n>Current educational frameworks typically assume a linear progression of GenAI literacy.<n>This paper challenges such an assumption through a psychometric analysis of a taxonomy-based self-assessment instrument.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T06:53:39Z)
• Framing, Judging, Steering: An Assessable Competency Model for Teach-ing Students to Reason With Generative AI [47.027290803102666]
  We propose CoRe-3 (Co-Reasoning), a competency model factoring productive AI use into three assessable skills.<n>We ground the skills in theory, state five testable propositions, and instantiate them in CoReasoningLab.<n>Human-rater agreement and outcomes are next; we release the instrument, data, and protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T10:25:31Z)
• Characterizing initial human-AI proof formalization workflows [66.06866890889131]
  Advances in AI systems' ability to generate code and engage in increasingly high-level mathematical reasoning promise to transform people's ability to formalize and thereby verify proofs.<n>We conduct a mixed-methods analysis into the initial impact of AI on people's formalization.<n>A qualitative survey shows that people's preferences are diverse, but with a general desire for AI assistance in formalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T22:58:19Z)
• Human-AI Productivity Paradoxes: Modeling the Interplay of Skill, Effort, and AI Assistance [1.9326159189892944]
  We propose a model of human-AI interaction to better understand and analyze several mechanisms by which AI affects productivity.<n>In our setup, human agents with varying skill levels exert utility-maximizing effort to produce certain task outcomes with AI assistance.<n>We find that incorporating either endogeneity in skill development or in AI unreliability can induce a productivity paradox.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T00:12:27Z)
• Democratizing Generative AI for Sustainable Competitive Advantage [0.0]
  This paper develops a cross-level conceptual framework linking firm-level GenAI investment and governance to individual-level AI democratization.<n>We argue that individual-level AI democratization mediates the relationship between organizational GenAI investments and sustainable competitive advantage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T14:47:01Z)
• Modeling Developer Burnout with GenAI Adoption [7.774584001694508]
  We investigate the relationship between the adoption of GenAI and developers' burnout.<n>We first surveyed 442 developers across diverse organizations, roles, and levels of experience.<n>Our results show that GenAI adoption heightens burnout by increasing job demands, while job resources and positive perceptions of GenAI mitigate these effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T18:35:38Z)
• ML-Master: Towards AI-for-AI via Integration of Exploration and Reasoning [49.25518866694287]
  We propose ML-Master, a novel AI4AI agent that seamlessly integrates exploration and reasoning by employing a selectively scoped memory mechanism.<n>We evaluate ML-Master on the MLE-Bench, where it achieves a 29.3% average medal rate, significantly surpassing existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T17:53:28Z)
• Evaluating the AI-Lab Intervention: Impact on Student Perception and Use of Generative AI in Early Undergraduate Computer Science Courses [0.0]
  Generative AI (GenAI) is rapidly entering computer science education.<n>Concerns about overreliance coexist with a gap in research on structured scaffolding to guide tool use in formal courses.<n>This study examines the impact of a dedicated "AI-Lab" intervention on undergraduate students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T18:12:42Z)
• General Scales Unlock AI Evaluation with Explanatory and Predictive Power [57.7995945974989]
  benchmarking has guided progress in AI, but it has offered limited explanatory and predictive power for general-purpose AI systems.<n>We introduce general scales for AI evaluation that can explain what common AI benchmarks really measure.<n>Our fully-automated methodology builds on 18 newly-crafted rubrics that place instance demands on general scales that do not saturate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T01:13:56Z)
• Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation [66.06040950325969]
  This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation.<n>By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T05:56:04Z)
• Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
  Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI. While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision. This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation. We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z)
• Human-AI Interactions and Societal Pitfalls [3.4471935446780355]
  When working with generative artificial intelligence (AI), users may see productivity gains, but the AI-generated content may not match their preferences exactly.<n>We show that the interplay between individual-level decisions and AI training may lead to societal challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T09:09:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.