Retrieve Only Relevant Tables Whether Few or Many: Adaptive Table Retrieval Method

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18766v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 14:53:56 GMT
• Title: Retrieve Only Relevant Tables Whether Few or Many: Adaptive Table Retrieval Method
• Abstract summary: Existing table retrieval approaches select a pre-determined set of k tables with the highest similarity to the query.<n>The number of required tables varies across queries and cannot be known in advance.<n>We propose an adaptive table retrieval method that adjusts the number of tables retrieved according to the requirements of each query.
• Score: 49.38787814788666
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieving relevant tables from extensive databases for a given natural language query is essential for accurately answering questions in tasks such as text-to-SQL. Existing table retrieval approaches select a pre-determined set of k tables with the highest similarity to the query. However, the number of required tables varies across queries and cannot be known in advance. Enforcing a fixed number of retrieved tables regardless of the query may either retrieve an undersized set, failing to obtain all necessary evidence, or retrieve an oversized pool, including irrelevant tables. To address this issue, we propose an adaptive table retrieval method that adjusts the number of tables retrieved according to the requirements of each query. Specifically, we utilize an adaptive thresholding mechanism to selectively retrieve tables and integrate a sliding-window reranking algorithm to efficiently process a large table corpus. Extensive experiments on Spider, BIRD, and Spider 2.0 demonstrate that our method effectively addresses the limitations of the top-k retrieval strategy, improving performance in retrieval and downstream tasks. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/sbY99/Adaptive-Table-Retrieval.

Related papers

• CORE-T: COherent REtrieval of Tables for Text-to-SQL [91.76918495375384]
  CORE-T is a scalable, training-free framework that enriches tables with purpose metadata and pre-computes a lightweight table-compatibility cache.<n>Across Bird, Spider, and MMQA, CORE-T improves table-selection F1 by up to 22.7 points while retrieving up to 42% fewer tables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T14:51:23Z)
• Improving Table Retrieval with Question Generation from Partial Tables [2.2169618382995764]
  We propose QGpT, a simple yet effective method that uses an LLM to generate synthetic questions based on small portions of a table.<n>The generated questions are then jointly embedded with the partial table segments used for generation, enhancing semantic alignment with user queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T09:35:56Z)
• RAG over Tables: Hierarchical Memory Index, Multi-Stage Retrieval, and Benchmarking [63.253294691180635]
  In real-world scenarios, beyond pure text, a substantial amount of knowledge is stored in tables.<n>We first propose a table-corpora-aware RAG framework, named T-RAG, which consists of the hierarchical memory index, multi-stage retrieval, and graph-aware prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T04:24:41Z)
• Tailoring Table Retrieval from a Field-aware Hybrid Matching Perspective [70.13748256886288]
  Table retrieval is less explored compared to text retrieval.<n>Different table fields have varying matching preferences.<n>We introduce a Table-tailored HYbrid Matching rEtriever (THYME)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:57:10Z)
• Is Table Retrieval a Solved Problem? Exploring Join-Aware Multi-Table Retrieval [52.592071689901196]
  We introduce a method that uncovers useful join relations for any query and database during table retrieval.<n>Our method outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches for table retrieval by up to 9.3% in F1 score and for end-to-end QA by up to 5.4% in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T15:55:01Z)
• Table Retrieval May Not Necessitate Table-specific Model Design [83.27735758203089]
  We focus on the task of table retrieval, and ask: "is table-specific model design necessary for table retrieval?" Based on an analysis on a table-based portion of the Natural Questions dataset (NQ-table), we find that structure plays a negligible role in more than 70% of the cases. We then experiment with three modules to explicitly encode table structures, namely auxiliary row/column embeddings, hard attention masks, and soft relation-based attention biases. None of these yielded significant improvements, suggesting that table-specific model design may not be necessary for table retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:35:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.