Learning Interpretable Point-Based Clinical Risk Scores via Direct Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19113v1
• Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 20:58:39 GMT
• Title: Learning Interpretable Point-Based Clinical Risk Scores via Direct Optimization
• Abstract summary: We develop new machine learning algorithms to learn additive scoring directly under explicit and sensible optimality objectives.<n>We apply the proposed method to a large electronic health record (EHR) cohort to construct an integer-weighted comorbidity score for measuring the risk of post-discharge mortality.
• Score: 16.98127677447133
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Many clinical risk scores are deployed as additive rules with nonnegative integer points assigned to relevant binary predictive features. These integer weights not only make the score easier to use in practice but also promote sparsity in the resulting prediction model. Such risk scores are often derived by first fitting a regression model and then rounding the estimated coefficients to the nearest integer after appropriate scaling. This approach is computationally fast but does not guarantee optimality of the resulting score. Alternatively, one may search over all possible integer weights to directly optimize a value function by posing the problem as an integer programming task. However, the associated computational burden can be substantial, especially when the value function is nonconcave or even discontinuous. In this paper, we develop new machine learning algorithms that employ a flexible greedy optimization strategy to learn such additive scoring directly under explicit and sensible optimality objectives. We apply the proposed method to a large electronic health record (EHR) cohort in Epic Cosmos to construct an integer-weighted comorbidity score for measuring the risk of post-discharge mortality. We also conduct a simulation study to examine the finite-sample operating characteristics.

Related papers

• The Approximation Ratio for the Risk of Myopic Bayesian Active Learning for Linear Regression [1.2382630144282716]
  We prove a first-of-its-kind approximation ratio for the greedy algorithm's risk that is tight up to an absolute constant.<n>We illustrate the results with simple numerical simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T15:07:41Z)
• Gradient Boosted Risk Scores [0.45835414225547183]
  Risk scores are an interpretable and actionable class of machine learning models.<n>We propose a simple and effective approach towards building compact and predictive risk scores.<n>We show that our method achieves competitive predictive performance while producing substantially more compact scores than regression-based alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T13:44:23Z)
• Goal-Oriented Influence-Maximizing Data Acquisition for Learning and Optimization [28.53710231018475]
  We propose an active acquisition algorithm that avoids explicit posterior inference while remaining uncertainty-aware through inverse curvature.<n>GOIMDA selects inputs by maximizing their expected influence on a user-specified goal functional.<n>We show theoretically that, for generalized linear models, GOIMDA approximates predictive-entropy minimization up to a correction term accounting for goal alignment and prediction bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T07:57:11Z)
• Revisiting Randomization in Greedy Model Search [16.15551706774035]
  We propose and analyze an ensemble of greedy forward selection estimators that are randomized by feature subsampling.<n>We design a novel implementation based on dynamic programming that greatly improves its computational efficiency.<n>Contrary to prevailing belief that randomized ensembling is analogous to shrinkage, we show that it can simultaneously reduce training error and degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:13:53Z)
• Self-Boost via Optimal Retraining: An Analysis via Approximate Message Passing [58.52119063742121]
  Retraining a model using its own predictions together with the original, potentially noisy labels is a well-known strategy for improving the model performance.<n>This paper addresses the question of how to optimally combine the model's predictions and the provided labels.<n>Our main contribution is the derivation of the Bayes optimal aggregator function to combine the current model's predictions and the given labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T07:16:44Z)
• Accelerated zero-order SGD under high-order smoothness and overparameterized regime [79.85163929026146]
  We present a novel gradient-free algorithm to solve convex optimization problems. Such problems are encountered in medicine, physics, and machine learning. We provide convergence guarantees for the proposed algorithm under both types of noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T10:26:17Z)
• Semiparametric conformal prediction [79.6147286161434]
  We construct a conformal prediction set accounting for the joint correlation structure of the vector-valued non-conformity scores.<n>We flexibly estimate the joint cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the scores.<n>Our method yields desired coverage and competitive efficiency on a range of real-world regression problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T14:29:02Z)
• Equation Discovery with Bayesian Spike-and-Slab Priors and Efficient Kernels [57.46832672991433]
  We propose a novel equation discovery method based on Kernel learning and BAyesian Spike-and-Slab priors (KBASS) We use kernel regression to estimate the target function, which is flexible, expressive, and more robust to data sparsity and noises. We develop an expectation-propagation expectation-maximization algorithm for efficient posterior inference and function estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T03:55:09Z)
• Efficient and Differentiable Conformal Prediction with General Function Classes [96.74055810115456]
  We propose a generalization of conformal prediction to multiple learnable parameters. We show that it achieves approximate valid population coverage and near-optimal efficiency within class. Experiments show that our algorithm is able to learn valid prediction sets and improve the efficiency significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T18:37:23Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.