When to Answer and When to Defer: A Decision Framework for Reliable Code Predictions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19369v1
• Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 05:04:42 GMT
• Title: When to Answer and When to Defer: A Decision Framework for Reliable Code Predictions
• Abstract summary: This work introduces a unified framework that integrates uncertainty estimation, model calibration, and tool-based abstention handling for code models.<n>The proposed design enables models to assign reliable correctness probabilities, abstain under uncertainty, and invoke lightweight program analysis procedures to process abstained cases.
• Score: 11.136449698197174
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Code language models are increasingly adopted for both understanding and generative tasks. Despite their success, these models frequently produce overconfident incorrect predictions and underconfident correct predictions, undermining their reliability in deployment. Practical deployment demands three capabilities: accurately estimating the likelihood of correctness, abstaining on uncertain predictions, and invoking external mechanisms to validate or repair abstained outputs. Existing calibration and uncertainty estimation methods, primarily developed for natural language tasks, do not readily transfer to code. Notably, post-hoc calibration techniques often reduce probability misalignment but fail to improve the ranking of predictions by correctness likelihood-a requirement for selective prediction under partial coverage. Furthermore, most approaches treat uncertainty as a passive indicator rather than an actionable signal. This work introduces a unified framework that integrates uncertainty estimation, model calibration, and tool-based abstention handling for code models. The proposed design enables models to assign reliable correctness probabilities, abstain under uncertainty, and invoke lightweight program analysis procedures to process abstained cases. By combining these components within a single deployment-oriented workflow, this framework supports risk-aware, coverage-controlled use of code models across both classification and generation settings.

Related papers

• Conformal Reliability: A New Evaluation Metric for Conditional Generation [62.761166941396844]
  Conditional generative models have recently remarkable success in various applications.<n>We propose a novel evaluation metric called reliability based on prediction set at a pre-specified confidence level.<n>We introduce Conformal ReLiability (CReL), a framework that can (i) construct a prediction set and (ii) accurately optimize the reliability score within the constructed prediction set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T03:52:44Z)
• Recipes for Calibration Checks in Safety-Critical Applications [0.0]
  We introduce a framework for calibration checks for safety-critical prediction systems.<n>The checks produce a single accept/reject decision for data collected from a forecaster.<n>We demonstrate the applicability of the framework on two complementary example problems, weather forecasting and robot pose estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T09:43:55Z)
• Geometric Calibration and Neutral Zones for Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Class Classification [0.0]
  This work bridges information geometry and statistical learning, offering formal guarantees for uncertainty-aware classification in applications requiring rigorous validation.<n> Empirical validation on Adeno-Associated Virus classification demonstrates that the two-stage framework captures 72.5% of errors while deferring 34.5% of samples, reducing automated decision error rates from 16.8% to 6.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T01:29:49Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning [1.2183405753834562]
  This thesis investigates how uncertainty estimation can enhance the safety and trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) systems.<n>We first show that a model's training trajectory contains rich uncertainty signals that can be exploited without altering its architecture or loss.<n>We propose a lightweight, post-hoc abstention method that works across tasks, avoids the cost of deep ensembles, and achieves state-of-the-art selective prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T02:33:53Z)
• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification.<n>Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data.<n>We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasts for Arbitrary Sequences [58.54729945445505]
  Real-world data streams can change unpredictably due to distribution shifts, feedback loops and adversarial actors.<n>We present a forecasting framework ensuring valid uncertainty estimates regardless of how data evolves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T21:46:42Z)
• Error-Driven Uncertainty Aware Training [7.702016079410588]
  Error-Driven Uncertainty Aware Training aims to enhance the ability of neural classifiers to estimate their uncertainty correctly. The EUAT approach operates during the model's training phase by selectively employing two loss functions depending on whether the training examples are correctly or incorrectly predicted. We evaluate EUAT using diverse neural models and datasets in the image recognition domains considering both non-adversarial and adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T11:48:14Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Calibrating AI Models for Wireless Communications via Conformal Prediction [55.47458839587949]
  Conformal prediction is applied for the first time to the design of AI for communication systems. This paper investigates the application of conformal prediction as a general framework to obtain AI models that produce decisions with formal calibration guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T12:52:23Z)
• Calibrated Selective Classification [34.08454890436067]
  We develop a new approach to selective classification in which we propose a method for rejecting examples with "uncertain" uncertainties. We present a framework for learning selectively calibrated models, where a separate selector network is trained to improve the selective calibration error of a given base model. We demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of our approach on multiple image classification and lung cancer risk assessment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T13:31:09Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.