Sampling-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19469v1
• Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 07:21:53 GMT
• Title: Sampling-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: We propose a model-based reinforcement learning algorithm that maintains safety throughout the learning process.<n>This formulation approximates an intractable worst-case optimization over uncertain dynamics.<n>Under regularity conditions, we derive high-probability guarantees of safety throughout learning and a finite-time sample complexity bound for recovering a near-optimal policy.
• Score: 30.21184523512902
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Safe exploration remains a fundamental challenge in reinforcement learning (RL), limiting the deployment of RL agents in the real world. We propose Sampling-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning (SBSRL), a model-based RL algorithm that maintains safety throughout the learning process by enforcing constraints jointly across a finite set of dynamics samples. This formulation approximates an intractable worst-case optimization over uncertain dynamics and enables practical safety guarantees in continuous domains. We further introduce an exploration strategy based on constraining epistemic uncertainty, eliminating the need for explicit exploration bonuses. Under regularity conditions, we derive high-probability guarantees of safety throughout learning and a finite-time sample complexity bound for recovering a near-optimal policy. Empirically, SBSRL achieves safe and efficient exploration both in simulation and in real robotic hardware, and readily extends to practical deep-ensemble implementations that scale to high-dimensional continuous control problems.

Related papers

• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Recovery-based Shielding with Gaussian Process Dynamics Models [57.006252510102506]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful framework for optimal decision-making and control but often lacks provable guarantees for safety-critical applications.<n>We introduce a novel recovery-based shielding framework that enables safe RL with a provable safety lower bound for unknown and non-linear continuous dynamical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T22:03:35Z)
• Constrained Meta Reinforcement Learning with Provable Test-Time Safety [8.354731976915588]
  Many real-world applications impose safety constraints during testing.<n>We propose an algorithm that refines policies learned during training, with provable safety and sample complexity guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T15:21:37Z)
• Safe Exploration via Policy Priors [45.58021831092113]
  We show that SOOPER guarantees safety throughout learning, and establish convergence to an optimal policy by bounding its cumulative regret.<n>Experiments on key safe RL benchmarks and real-world hardware demonstrate that SOOPER is scalable, outperforms the state-of-the-art and validate our theoretical guarantees in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T13:45:28Z)
• ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning [48.536695794883826]
  We present ActSafe, a novel model-based RL algorithm for safe and efficient exploration.<n>We show that ActSafe guarantees safety during learning while also obtaining a near-optimal policy in finite time.<n>In addition, we propose a practical variant of ActSafe that builds on latest model-based RL advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T10:46:02Z)
• State-Wise Safe Reinforcement Learning With Pixel Observations [12.338614299403305]
  We propose a novel pixel-observation safe RL algorithm that efficiently encodes state-wise safety constraints with unknown hazard regions. As a joint learning framework, our approach begins by constructing a latent dynamics model with low-dimensional latent spaces derived from pixel observations. We then build and learn a latent barrier-like function on top of the latent dynamics and conduct policy optimization simultaneously, thereby improving both safety and the total expected return.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T20:32:30Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Safe Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with an Uncertainty-Aware Reachability Certificate [6.581362609037603]
  We build a safe reinforcement learning framework to resolve constraints required by the DRC and its corresponding shield policy. We also devise a line search method to maintain safety and reach higher returns simultaneously while leveraging the shield policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:16:53Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Confidence-Based Filters [78.39359694273575]
  We develop a control-theoretic approach for certifying state safety constraints for nominal policies learned via standard reinforcement learning techniques. We provide formal safety guarantees, and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T11:43:23Z)
• Learning Barrier Certificates: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with Zero Training-time Violations [64.39401322671803]
  This paper explores the possibility of safe RL algorithms with zero training-time safety violations. We propose an algorithm, Co-trained Barrier Certificate for Safe RL (CRABS), which iteratively learns barrier certificates, dynamics models, and policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T04:59:05Z)
• Cautious Reinforcement Learning with Logical Constraints [78.96597639789279]
  An adaptive safe padding forces Reinforcement Learning (RL) to synthesise optimal control policies while ensuring safety during the learning process. Theoretical guarantees are available on the optimality of the synthesised policies and on the convergence of the learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T00:01:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.