Trajectory Planning and Control near the Limits: an Open Experimental Benchmark on the RoboRacer Platform

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19881v1
• Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 14:14:07 GMT
• Title: Trajectory Planning and Control near the Limits: an Open Experimental Benchmark on the RoboRacer Platform
• Abstract summary: Our framework includes time-optimal raceline generation, online time-optimal velocity replanning, geometric path tracking controllers, and a new model-structured neural network (MS-NN) to learn the inverse dynamics for steering control.<n>We deploy our framework on a 1:10-scale RoboRacer platform, using two circuits.<n>Our MS-NN significantly improves tracking accuracy, decreases steering oscillations, and is physically interpretable.
• Score: 0.7773695810928872
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a modular framework to benchmark new and existing methods for trajectory planning and control in high-acceleration maneuvers that push autonomous driving to the limits. Our framework includes time-optimal raceline generation, online time-optimal velocity replanning, geometric path tracking controllers, and a new model-structured neural network (MS-NN) to learn the inverse dynamics for steering control. We deploy our framework on a 1:10-scale RoboRacer platform, using two circuits. Through several ablations with cautious and aggressive racelines, we study the performance of single modules and their combinations. We show that our MS-NN significantly improves tracking accuracy, decreases steering oscillations, and is physically interpretable. Moreover, online velocity replanning improves lap times by compensating for execution errors, and enables the vehicle to safely reach higher speeds and accelerations. To support future research, our code, datasets, videos and results are publicly available at https://roboracer-benchmark.github.io/planning_control_benchmark/.

Related papers

• DIRECT: When and Where Should You Allocate Test-Time Compute in Embodied Planners? [57.585275546688116]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed as high-level planners for embodied agents.<n>We argue that choosing when and where to spend test-time compute is central to bringing frontier performance to the real world.<n>We introduce DIRECT, a routing framework that uses multimodal scene context to allocate compute per prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T17:58:49Z)
• Benchmarking Empirical and Learning-Based Approaches for Feedforward Steering Control in Autonomous Racing [2.183305325115666]
  Feedforward steering control is a key component of hierarchical control architectures for autonomous racing.<n>This paper presents a benchmark of two learning-based and two empirical feedforward controllers.<n>We test the feedforward controllers in a high-fidelity simulation framework based on the real-world Abu Dhabi Autonomous Racing League competition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T12:44:36Z)
• Can Users Specify Driving Speed? Bench2Drive-Speed: Benchmark and Baselines for Desired-Speed Conditioned Autonomous Driving [50.09883181221131]
  We present Bench2Drive-Speed, a benchmark with metrics, dataset, and baselines for desired-speed conditioned autonomous driving.<n>We introduce explicit inputs of users' desired target-speed and overtake/follow instructions to driving policy models.<n>Our experiments show that, under proper re-annotation, models trained on regular driving data perform comparably to on expert demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T17:26:41Z)
• Spatially-Aware Adaptive Trajectory Optimization with Controller-Guided Feedback for Autonomous Racing [74.83272587893508]
  We present a framework for autonomous raceline optimization that combines NURBS-based trajectory representation, CMA-ES global trajectory optimization, and controller-guided spatial feedback.<n>In simulation, our approach achieves a 17.38% lap time reduction compared to a controller parametrized with maximum static acceleration.<n>On real hardware, tested with different tire compounds ranging from high to low friction, we obtain a 7.60% lap time improvement without explicitly parametrizing friction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T15:10:44Z)
• ZTRS: Zero-Imitation End-to-end Autonomous Driving with Trajectory Scoring [52.195295396336526]
  ZTRS (Zero-Imitation End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Trajectory Scoring) is a framework that combines the strengths of both worlds: sensor inputs without losing information and RL training for robust planning.<n>ZTRS demonstrates strong performance across three benchmarks: Navtest, Navhard, and HUGSIM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T06:26:36Z)
• Track-On2: Enhancing Online Point Tracking with Memory [57.820749134569574]
  We extend our prior model Track-On into Track-On2, a simple and efficient transformer-based model for online long-term tracking.<n>Track-On2 improves both performance and efficiency through architectural refinements, more effective use of memory, and improved synthetic training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T15:00:18Z)
• Partial End-to-end Reinforcement Learning for Robustness Against Modelling Error in Autonomous Racing [0.0]
  This paper addresses the issue of increasing the performance of reinforcement learning (RL) solutions for autonomous racing cars. We propose a partial end-to-end algorithm that decouples the planning and control tasks. By leveraging the robustness of a classical controller, our partial end-to-end driving algorithm exhibits better robustness towards model mismatches than standard end-to-end algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T14:27:10Z)
• Reaching the Limit in Autonomous Racing: Optimal Control versus Reinforcement Learning [66.10854214036605]
  A central question in robotics is how to design a control system for an agile mobile robot. We show that a neural network controller trained with reinforcement learning (RL) outperformed optimal control (OC) methods in this setting. Our findings allowed us to push an agile drone to its maximum performance, achieving a peak acceleration greater than 12 times the gravitational acceleration and a peak velocity of 108 kilometers per hour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T02:40:27Z)
• Robust Autonomous Vehicle Pursuit without Expert Steering Labels [41.168074206046164]
  We present a learning method for lateral and longitudinal motion control of an ego-vehicle for vehicle pursuit. The car being controlled does not have a pre-defined route, rather it reactively adapts to follow a target vehicle while maintaining a safety distance. We extensively validate our approach using the CARLA simulator on a wide range of terrains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T14:09:39Z)
• Motion Planning and Control for Multi Vehicle Autonomous Racing at High Speeds [100.61456258283245]
  This paper presents a multi-layer motion planning and control architecture for autonomous racing. The proposed solution has been applied on a Dallara AV-21 racecar and tested at oval race tracks achieving lateral accelerations up to 25 $m/s2$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-22T15:16:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.