Efficient Table QA via TableGrid Navigation and Progressive Inference Prompting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20254v1
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 12:00:24 GMT
- Title: Efficient Table QA via TableGrid Navigation and Progressive Inference Prompting
- Abstract summary: Table Question-Answering (TQA) requires precise cell retrieval and multi-step structured reasoning.<n>We propose a training-free TQA approach with two structured prompting frameworks: TableGrid Navigation (TGN) and Progressive Inference Prompting (PIP)<n>On TableBench, TGN improves over the strongest baseline by 3.8 points, and on FeTaQa, PIP achieves SOTA performance over ReAct and Chain-of-Thought.
- Score: 3.8761064607384195
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results on NLP tasks, however, their performance on tabular data still needs research attention, because Table Question-Answering (TQA) requires precise cell retrieval and multi-step structured reasoning. Existing work improves TQA either by fine-tuning or training LLMs on task-specific tabular data, but often lacks verifiable control over how the model navigates tables and derives answers. In this work, we propose a training-free TQA approach with two structured prompting frameworks: TableGrid Navigation (TGN), which iteratively navigates rows and columns via a three-module loop to locate evidence and refine answers, and Progressive Inference Prompting (PIP), which enforces columns identification for explicit progressive row selection constraint according to the query. We evaluate 17 LLMs against 6 baselines on TableBench and FeTaQa dataset. On TableBench, TGN improves over the strongest baseline by 3.8 points, and on FeTaQa, PIP achieves SOTA performance over ReAct and Chain-of-Thought. Beyond inference-time gains, PIP and TGN can also serve as supervision templates to fine-tune small models, narrowing the performance gap to much larger architectures in resource-constrained settings, offering versatile and cost-efficient solution for TQA.
Related papers
- TDATR: Improving End-to-End Table Recognition via Table Detail-Aware Learning and Cell-Level Visual Alignment [70.83664203825235]
TDATR (Table Detail-Aware Table Recognition) improves end-to-end TR through table detail-aware learning and cell-level visual alignment.<n>We achieve state-of-the-art or highly competitive performance on seven benchmarks without dataset-specific fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T05:45:02Z) - CORE-T: COherent REtrieval of Tables for Text-to-SQL [91.76918495375384]
CORE-T is a scalable, training-free framework that enriches tables with purpose metadata and pre-computes a lightweight table-compatibility cache.<n>Across Bird, Spider, and MMQA, CORE-T improves table-selection F1 by up to 22.7 points while retrieving up to 42% fewer tables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T14:51:23Z) - A Hybrid Search for Complex Table Question Answering in Securities Report [0.9430947207126281]
We propose a cell extraction method for Table Question Answering (TQA) without manual identification.<n>Our approach estimates table headers by computing similarities between a given question and individual cells.<n>We then select as the answer the cells at the intersection of the most relevant row and column.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T10:19:27Z) - TableZoomer: A Collaborative Agent Framework for Large-scale Table Question Answering [26.00027389659854]
TableZoomer is a programming-based agent framework for the table question answering (TQA) task.<n>It introduces three key innovations: (1) replacing the original fully verbalized table with structured table schema to bridge the semantic gap and reduce computational complexity; (2) a query-aware table zooming mechanism that dynamically generates sub-table schema through column selection and entity linking; and (3) a Program-of-Thoughts (PoT) strategy that transforms queries into executable code to mitigate numerical hallucination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-01T09:53:01Z) - NeedleInATable: Exploring Long-Context Capability of Large Language Models towards Long-Structured Tables [47.937322344856945]
textscNeedleInATable (NIAT) treats each table cell as a needle'' and requires models to extract the target cell based on cell locations or lookup questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-09T03:46:56Z) - RAG over Tables: Hierarchical Memory Index, Multi-Stage Retrieval, and Benchmarking [63.253294691180635]
In real-world scenarios, beyond pure text, a substantial amount of knowledge is stored in tables.<n>We first propose a table-corpora-aware RAG framework, named T-RAG, which consists of the hierarchical memory index, multi-stage retrieval, and graph-aware prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T04:24:41Z) - TART: An Open-Source Tool-Augmented Framework for Explainable Table-based Reasoning [61.14586098005874]
Current Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit limited ability to understand table structures and to apply precise numerical reasoning.<n>We introduce our Tool-Augmented Reasoning framework for Tables (TART), which integrates LLMs with specialized tools.<n>TART contains three key components: a table formatter to ensure accurate data representation, a tool maker to develop specific computational tools, and an explanation generator to maintain explainability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T06:19:59Z) - KET-QA: A Dataset for Knowledge Enhanced Table Question Answering [63.56707527868466]
We propose to use a knowledge base (KB) as the external knowledge source for TableQA.
Every question requires the integration of information from both the table and the sub-graph to be answered.
We design a retriever-reasoner structured pipeline model to extract pertinent information from the vast knowledge sub-graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-13T18:26:32Z) - TAP4LLM: Table Provider on Sampling, Augmenting, and Packing Semi-structured Data for Large Language Model Reasoning [55.33939289989238]
We propose TAP4LLM as a versatile pre-processor suite for leveraging large language models (LLMs) in table-based tasks effectively.
It covers several distinct components: (1) table sampling to decompose large tables into manageable sub-tables based on query semantics, (2) table augmentation to enhance tables with additional knowledge from external sources or models, and (3) table packing & serialization to convert tables into various formats suitable for LLMs' understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-14T15:37:04Z) - End-to-End Table Question Answering via Retrieval-Augmented Generation [19.89730342792824]
We introduce T-RAG, an end-to-end Table QA model, where a non-parametric dense vector index is fine-tuned jointly with BART, a parametric sequence-to-sequence model to generate answer tokens.
Given any natural language question, T-RAG utilizes a unified pipeline to automatically search through a table corpus to directly locate the correct answer from the table cells.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T23:30:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.