Distributed Direct Preference Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20696v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 04:49:13 GMT
• Title: Distributed Direct Preference Optimization
• Abstract summary: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) avoids explicit reward modeling but lacks convergence guarantees under federated and decentralized training.<n>We provide the first convergence and time-complexity analysis of DPO in distributed environments.<n>For federated DPO, we derive convergence rates that quantify the impact of client drift, communication frequency, and preference heterogeneity.<n>For decentralized DPO, we establish convergence over general communication graphs and show how spectral connectivity governs optimization speed and consensus.
• Score: 3.0957695592556007
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Preference-based reinforcement learning (RL) is a key paradigm for aligning policies with human judgments, yet its theoretical behavior in distributed settings where preference data are fragmented across heterogeneous users remains poorly understood. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) avoids explicit reward modeling but lacks convergence guarantees under federated and decentralized training, where communication constraints and non-IID preferences fundamentally alter optimization dynamics. We provide the first convergence and time-complexity analysis of DPO in distributed environments. Modeling personalized offline RL with user-specific preference distributions, we characterize the induced global optimization landscape. For federated DPO, we derive convergence rates that quantify the impact of client drift, communication frequency, and preference heterogeneity; for decentralized DPO, we establish convergence over general communication graphs and show how spectral connectivity governs optimization speed and consensus. Empirically, we corroborate our theoretical insights on standard alignment benchmarks, demonstrating that our proposed methods not only enjoy strong theoretical guarantees but also deliver robust and scalable performance in practice. The code base is available here.

Related papers

• Conditional Equivalence of DPO and RLHF: Implicit Assumption, Failure Modes, and Provable Alignment [51.18269946911088]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a popular alternative to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)<n>We show that DPO and RLHF optimize fundamentally different objectives in such cases.<n>We introduce Constrained Preference Optimization (CPO), augmenting RLHF with constraints for provable alignment.<n>Our theoretical analysis establishes when DPOs' guarantees hold and provides solutions preserving simplicity with provable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T07:26:22Z)
• FedPDPO: Federated Personalized Direct Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment [55.97027207627]
  Fed PDPO (Federated Personalized Direct Preference Optimization) is a personalized framework for preference alignment of large language models (LLMs)<n>It adopts a parameter-efficient fine-tuning architecture where each client maintains a frozen pretrained LLM backbone augmented with a Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) adapter, enabling communication-efficient aggregation.<n>Experiments on multiple preference datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, achieving up to 4.80% average accuracy improvements in federated intra-domain and cross-domain settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T08:24:49Z)
• Provably avoiding over-optimization in Direct Preference Optimization without knowing the data distribution [47.604070468150844]
  We introduce PEPO, a single-step Direct Preference Optimization-like algorithm to mitigate the well-known over-optimization issue in preference learning.<n> PEPO achieves pessimism via an ensemble of preference-optimized policies trained on disjoint data subsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T22:31:07Z)
• Latent Adversarial Regularization for Offline Preference Optimization [21.271580780278473]
  We introduce GANPO, which achieves latent-space regularization by penalizing divergence between internal representations of a policy model and a reference model.<n>Experiments across multiple model architectures and tasks show consistent improvements from latent-space regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:21:57Z)
• Multi-Objective Reward and Preference Optimization: Theory and Algorithms [3.316593788543852]
  This thesis develops theoretical frameworks and algorithms that advance constrained reinforcement learning (RL) across control, preference learning, and alignment of large language models.<n>ACPO, e-COP, warmPref-PS, PSPL, and MOPO advance RL across average-cost, episodic, and preference-driven paradigms.<n> Collectively, the thesis unifies RL across average-cost, episodic, and preference-driven paradigms, delivering theoretical advances and practical tools for safe and aligned decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T12:51:21Z)
• Policy Regularized Distributionally Robust Markov Decision Processes with Linear Function Approximation [10.35045003737115]
  Decision-making under distribution shift is a central challenge in reinforcement learning (RL), where training and deployment environments differ.<n>We propose DR-RPO, a model-free online policy optimization method that learns robust policies with sublinear regret.<n>We show that DR-RPO can achieve suboptimality bounds and sample efficiency in robust RL, matching the performance of value-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T02:56:58Z)
• Stable Preference Optimization for LLMs: A Bilevel Approach Beyond Direct Preference Optimization [2.384797824772941]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of DPO's dynamics from a probability evolution perspective.<n>We propose a theoretically grounded bilevel optimization framework that tightly integrate supervised fine-tuning with an enhanced DPO objective a.k.a. stable preference optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T12:57:39Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC.<n>We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications.<n>We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHF [80.32171988565999]
  We introduce a unified approach to online and offline RLHF -- value-incentivized preference optimization (VPO)<n>VPO regularizes the maximum-likelihood estimate of the reward function with the corresponding value function.<n>Experiments on text summarization and dialog verify the practicality and effectiveness of VPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T17:51:42Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment [93.39181634597877]
  Direct preference optimization (DPO) was proposed to directly optimize the policy from preference data. We show that DPO derived based on the optimal solution of problem leads to a compromised mean-seeking approximation of the optimal solution in practice. We propose efficient exact optimization (EXO) of the alignment objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:51:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.