Everywhere Valid Bounds on False Discovery Proportions in Conformal Inference
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20726v1
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 05:24:39 GMT
- Title: Everywhere Valid Bounds on False Discovery Proportions in Conformal Inference
- Abstract summary: Conformal inference is often used to select test samples whose conformal p-values fall below a threshold.<n>The quality of such methods is often measured by the false discovery proportion (FDP), defined as the fraction of incorrect selections.<n>This paper establishes finite-sample, distribution-free upper bounds on the FDP that hold simultaneously over all possible rejection thresholds.
- Score: 19.796377044066286
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Modern applications of conformal inference to multiple testing problems, such as outlier detection and candidate selection, often involve selecting test samples whose conformal p-values fall below a threshold. The quality of such methods is often measured by the false discovery proportion (FDP), defined as the fraction of incorrect selections. Existing approaches typically control the expected value of the FDP, using methods such as the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. This approach fails to provide high-probability bounds on the realized false discovery proportion and invalidates statistical guarantees if the rejection threshold is selected after inspecting the data. This paper establishes finite-sample, distribution-free upper bounds on the FDP that hold simultaneously over all possible rejection thresholds, enabling arbitrary post hoc selection of the threshold. Simultaneous validity is achieved by constructing a high-probability envelope for the empirical distribution function of null conformal p-values by sampling from their joint distribution. Furthermore, our framework allows practitioners to modulate the envelope's shape, thereby producing tight bounds in rejection regions of primary interest. We use this flexible approach to derive simultaneous FDP upper bounds for both outlier detection and conformal selection. We demonstrate through synthetic and real-data experiments that the resulting bounds are both valid and substantially less conservative than those derived from existing approaches.
Related papers
- Exact Risk-Complexity Laws for Projective Boundaries in Scenario Optimization and Distribution-Free Certification [0.0]
Conditional violation risk follows an exact beta law, whose tail has a beta-binomial representation and whose parameter is a support, calibration, or compression dimension.<n>This paper identifies the deterministic boundary mechanism behind these formulas and derives the corresponding law when the observed boundary size is random.<n>It also yields conditional probabilistic certificates and a no-go result explaining why observed complexity alone is insufficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-01T14:58:38Z) - Beyond Fixed False Discovery Rates: Post-Hoc Conformal Selection with E-Variables [31.204606769083068]
Conformal selection (CS) uses calibration data to identify test inputs whose unobserved outcomes are likely to satisfy a pre-specified minimal quality requirement, while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR)<n>Existing methods fix the target FDR level before observing data, which prevents the user from adapting the balance between number of selected test inputs and FDR to downstream needs and constraints based on the available data.<n>We introduce post-hoc CS (PH-CS), which generates a path of candidate selection sets, each paired with a data-driven false discovery proportion (FDP) estimate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-13T11:02:44Z) - LEC: Linear Expectation Constraints for False-Discovery Control in Selective Prediction and Routing Systems [95.35293543918762]
Large language models (LLMs) often generate unreliable answers, while uncertainty methods fail to fully distinguish correct from incorrect predictions.<n>We address this issue through the lens of false discovery rate (FDR) control, ensuring that among all accepted predictions, the proportion of errors does not exceed a target risk level.<n>We propose LEC, which reinterprets selective prediction as a constrained decision problem by enforcing a Linear Expectation Constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T11:27:09Z) - COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z) - A Sample Efficient Conditional Independence Test in the Presence of Discretization [54.047334792855345]
Conditional Independence (CI) tests directly to discretized data can lead to incorrect conclusions.<n>Recent advancements have sought to infer the correct CI relationship between the latent variables through binarizing observed data.<n>Motivated by this, this paper introduces a sample-efficient CI test that does not rely on the binarization process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T12:41:26Z) - Conditional Testing based on Localized Conformal p-values [5.6779147365057305]
We define the localized conformal p-values by inverting prediction intervals and prove their theoretical properties.
These defined p-values are then applied to several conditional testing problems to illustrate their practicality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-25T11:30:14Z) - Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity [81.30551968980143]
We develop a new method for generating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution.
Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of conditional coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T20:44:48Z) - Mitigating LLM Hallucinations via Conformal Abstention [70.83870602967625]
We develop a principled procedure for determining when a large language model should abstain from responding in a general domain.
We leverage conformal prediction techniques to develop an abstention procedure that benefits from rigorous theoretical guarantees on the hallucination rate (error rate)
Experimentally, our resulting conformal abstention method reliably bounds the hallucination rate on various closed-book, open-domain generative question answering datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T11:32:03Z) - Testing for Outliers with Conformal p-values [14.158078752410182]
The goal is to test whether new independent samples belong to the same distribution as a reference data set or are outliers.
We propose a solution based on conformal inference, a broadly applicable framework which yields p-values that are marginally valid but mutually dependent for different test points.
We prove these p-values are positively dependent and enable exact false discovery rate control, although in a relatively weak marginal sense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-16T17:59:21Z) - Sparse Feature Selection Makes Batch Reinforcement Learning More Sample
Efficient [62.24615324523435]
This paper provides a statistical analysis of high-dimensional batch Reinforcement Learning (RL) using sparse linear function approximation.
When there is a large number of candidate features, our result sheds light on the fact that sparsity-aware methods can make batch RL more sample efficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-08T16:48:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.