Reviving Error Correction in Modern Deep Time-Series Forecasting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21088v1
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 12:22:18 GMT
• Title: Reviving Error Correction in Modern Deep Time-Series Forecasting
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Universal Error Corrector with Seasonal-Trend Decomposition (UEC-STD), which significantly improves correction accuracy and robustness across 4 backbones and 10 datasets.<n>Our findings provide a practical tool for enhancing forecasts while offering new insights into mitigating autoregressive errors in deep time-series models.
• Score: 16.500802488173917
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern deep-learning models have achieved remarkable success in time-series forecasting. Yet, their performance degrades in long-term prediction due to error accumulation in autoregressive inference, where predictions are recursively used as inputs. While classical error correction mechanisms (ECMs) have long been used in statistical methods, their applicability to deep learning models remains limited or ineffective. In this work, we revisit the error accumulation problem in deep time-series forecasting and investigate the role and necessity of ECMs in this new context. We propose a simple, architecture-agnostic error correction model that can be integrated with any existing forecaster without requiring retraining. By explicitly decomposing predictions into trend and seasonal components and training the corrector to adjust each separately, we introduce the Universal Error Corrector with Seasonal-Trend Decomposition (UEC-STD), which significantly improves correction accuracy and robustness across 4 backbones and 10 datasets. Our findings provide a practical tool for enhancing forecasts while offering new insights into mitigating autoregressive errors in deep time-series models. Code is available at https://github.com/DA2I2-SLM/UEC-STD.

Related papers

• Evaluating Forecasting Techniques for Hardware Errors on a Large-scale HPC System [19.52592944365196]
  This work investigates the boundaries of applying time series forecasting to HPC hardware error dynamics.<n>We use seven years of production logs from the Theta supercomputer to evaluate the predictive efficacy of classical statistical and deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T03:38:37Z)
• PnP-Corrector: A Universal Correction Framework for Coupled Spatiotemporal Forecasting [62.22445401483844]
  Existing methods are severely constrained by the bottleneck of compounding errors.<n>We propose a universal framework called -Cast-Corrector (Plug-and-Play Corrector)<n>Our method significantly enhances the long-term stability of coupled forecasting systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T13:12:33Z)
• Learning from Yesterday's Error: An Efficient Online Learning Method for Traffic Demand Prediction [6.104967994062357]
  FORESEE (Forecasting Online with Residual Smoothing and Ensemble Experts) is a lightweight online adaptation framework that is accurate, robust, and efficient.<n>It corrects today's forecast in each region using yesterday's prediction error, through exponential smoothing guided by a mixture-of-experts mechanism.<n>Experiments on seven real-world datasets with backbone models demonstrate that FORESEE consistently improves prediction accuracy, maintains robustness even when distribution shifts are minimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T10:19:39Z)
• FOREVER: Forgetting Curve-Inspired Memory Replay for Language Model Continual Learning [63.20028888397869]
  FOREVER (FORgEtting curVe-inspired mEmory) is a novel framework that aligns replay schedules with a model-centric notion of time.<n>Building on this approach, FOREVER incorporates a forgetting curve-based replay scheduler to determine when to replay and an intensity-aware regularization mechanism to adaptively control how to replay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T13:55:14Z)
• Revisiting Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Missing Values [65.30332997607141]
  Missing values are common in real-world time series.<n>Current approaches have developed an imputation-then-prediction framework that uses imputation modules to fill in missing values, followed by forecasting on the imputed data.<n>This framework overlooks a critical issue: there is no ground truth for the missing values, making the imputation process susceptible to errors that can degrade prediction accuracy.<n>We introduce Consistency-Regularized Information Bottleneck (CRIB), a novel framework built on the Information Bottleneck principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T20:57:48Z)
• Enhancing Transformer-Based Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting via Bagging, Boosting and Statistical Ensembles [7.787518725874443]
  Time series foundation models (TSFMs) have shown strong generalization and zero-shot capabilities for time series forecasting, anomaly detection, classification, and imputation.<n>This paper investigates a suite of statistical and ensemble-based enhancement techniques to improve robustness and accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T04:06:26Z)
• Error-quantified Conformal Inference for Time Series [55.11926160774831]
  Uncertainty quantification in time series prediction is challenging due to the temporal dependence and distribution shift on sequential data.<n>We propose itError-quantified Conformal Inference (ECI) by smoothing the quantile loss function.<n>ECI can achieve valid miscoverage control and output tighter prediction sets than other baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T15:02:36Z)
• Better Batch for Deep Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting [15.31488551912888]
  We propose an innovative training method that incorporates error autocorrelation to enhance probabilistic forecasting accuracy. Our method constructs a mini-batch as a collection of $D$ consecutive time series segments for model training. It explicitly learns a time-varying covariance matrix over each mini-batch, encoding error correlation among adjacent time steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T15:36:59Z)
• Time Series Forecasting Models Copy the Past: How to Mitigate [24.397660153755997]
  In the presence of noise and uncertainty, neural network models tend to replicate the last observed value of the time series. We propose a regularization term penalizing the replication of previously seen values. Our results indicate that the regularization term mitigates to some extent the aforementioned problem and gives rise to more robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-27T10:39:00Z)
• Probabilistic AutoRegressive Neural Networks for Accurate Long-range Forecasting [6.295157260756792]
  We introduce the Probabilistic AutoRegressive Neural Networks (PARNN) PARNN is capable of handling complex time series data exhibiting non-stationarity, nonlinearity, non-seasonality, long-range dependence, and chaotic patterns. We evaluate the performance of PARNN against standard statistical, machine learning, and deep learning models, including Transformers, NBeats, and DeepAR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T17:57:36Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shift [81.74795324629712]
  We call prediction-time batch normalization, which significantly improves model accuracy and calibration under covariate shift. We show that prediction-time batch normalization provides complementary benefits to existing state-of-the-art approaches for improving robustness. The method has mixed results when used alongside pre-training, and does not seem to perform as well under more natural types of dataset shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T05:08:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.