AttuneBench: A Conversation-Based Benchmark for LLM Emotional Intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21739v2
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 21:10:50 GMT
- Title: AttuneBench: A Conversation-Based Benchmark for LLM Emotional Intelligence
- Abstract summary: Emotional intelligence (EI) is central to human communication and increasingly important to assess.<n>We introduce AttuneBench, a benchmark grounded in 200 genuine multi-turn human-model conversations.<n>We find that model rankings on emotion recognition, behavioral classification, preference prediction, and judged response quality are largely independent.
- Score: 1.7294100412670375
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Emotional intelligence (EI), the ability to perceive, understand, and respond appropriately to others' emotional states, is central to human communication, and increasingly important to assess as LLMs assume conversational roles in everyday life. Existing EI benchmarks rely on synthetic prompts, single-turn cases, or third-party annotation. These approaches do not directly measure how models infer and respond to a participant's emotional state over the course of a real conversation. We introduce AttuneBench, a benchmark grounded in 200 genuine multi-turn human-model conversations in which participants conversed with anonymized LLMs and provided turn-by-turn annotations of their emotional state, the model's behavior, and their preferred responses. Across 11 evaluated models, we find that model rankings on emotion recognition, behavioral classification, preference prediction, and judged response quality are largely independent, indicating that emotionally intelligent behavior decomposes into separable capabilities. Preference alignment and response-quality judgments are substantially more model-discriminating than emotion-label accuracy. These results indicate that emotionally intelligent behavior requires predicting what kind of response a specific user wants in context, a distinction that aggregate scoring can obscure and that single-turn or synthetic formats cannot directly capture across turns. AttuneBench provides a framework for assessing each of these capabilities and for diagnosing model-specific strengths and failure modes in emotionally salient conversation.
Related papers
- Emotional intelligence in large language models is fragmented across perception, cognition, and interaction [24.97041943324913]
We introduce FACET (Functional Affective Competence and Empathy Test), a psychometrically grounded framework comprising 480 expert-crafted items.<n>We demonstrate that emotional intelligence is not a monolithic capability but is fragmented across cognitive and interactive dimensions.<n>We categorize these discrepancies into three distinct performance profiles: cognitive-dominant, interactive-dominant, and context-dependent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-23T17:48:09Z) - SELF-EMO: Emotional Self-Evolution from Recognition to Consistent Expression [13.896538941019722]
We propose SELF-EMO, a self-evolution framework grounded in the hypothesis that better emotion prediction leads to more consistent emotional responses.<n>We introduce two auxiliary tasks, emotional understanding and emotional expression, and design a role-based self-play paradigm where the model acts as both an emotion recognizer and a dialogue responder.<n> Experiments on IEMOCAP, MELD, and EmoryNLP show that SELF-EMO achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving accuracy by +6.33% on Qwen3-4B and +8.54% on Qwen3-8B.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-20T09:27:40Z) - SocialOmni: Benchmarking Audio-Visual Social Interactivity in Omni Models [86.19617358080016]
Social Omni is a benchmark that operationalizes the evaluation of conversational interactivity across three core dimensions.<n>Social Omni features 2,000 perception samples and a quality-controlled diagnostic set of 209 interaction-generation instances.<n>Our analysis reveals a pronounced decoupling between a model's perceptual accuracy and its ability to generate contextually appropriate interruptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T17:58:44Z) - EmoLLM: Appraisal-Grounded Cognitive-Emotional Co-Reasoning in Large Language Models [15.744777556347708]
EmoLLM is an appraisal-grounded framework for IQ/EQ co-reasoning in dialogue.<n>We train EmoLLM in a multi-turn role-play environment with reinforcement learning.<n>EmoLLM improves emotional state outcomes and response quality over strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T14:17:50Z) - ADEPT: RL-Aligned Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools -- From Consensus Learning to Ambiguity-Driven Emotion Reasoning [67.22219034602514]
We introduce ADEPT (Agentic Decoding of Emotion via Evidence Probing Tools), a framework that reframes emotion recognition as a multi-turn inquiry process.<n> ADEPT transforms an SLLM into an agent that maintains an evolving candidate emotion set and adaptively invokes dedicated semantic and acoustic probing tools.<n>We show that ADEPT improves primary emotion accuracy in most settings while substantially improving minor emotion characterization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T08:33:37Z) - Decoding Ambiguous Emotions with Test-Time Scaling in Audio-Language Models [18.059483722792077]
We introduce the first benchmark for ambiguous emotion recognition in speech with ALMs under test-time scaling.<n>Our evaluation systematically compares eight state-of-the-art ALMs and five TTS strategies across three prominent speech emotion datasets.<n>Our benchmark establishes a foundation for developing more robust, context-aware, and emotionally intelligent speech-based AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T07:41:57Z) - Reflecting Twice before Speaking with Empathy: Self-Reflective Alternating Inference for Empathy-Aware End-to-End Spoken Dialogue [53.95386201009769]
We introduce EmpathyEval, a descriptive natural-language-based evaluation model for assessing empathetic quality in spoken dialogues.<n>We propose ReEmpathy, an end-to-end Spoken Language Models that enhances empathetic dialogue through a novel Empathetic Self-Reflective Alternating Inference mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T09:04:50Z) - AEQ-Bench: Measuring Empathy of Omni-Modal Large Models [55.722881748046895]
We introduce AEQ-Bench, a novel benchmark to assess two core empathetic capabilities of omni-modal large models (OLMs)<n>AEQ-Bench incorporates two novel settings that vary in context specificity and speech tone.<n> Comprehensive assessment across linguistic and paralinguistic metrics reveals that OLMs trained with audio output capabilities generally outperformed models with text-only outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T15:39:50Z) - A Unified Spoken Language Model with Injected Emotional-Attribution Thinking for Human-like Interaction [50.05919688888947]
This paper presents a unified spoken language model for emotional intelligence, enhanced by a novel data construction strategy termed Injected Emotional-Attribution Thinking (IEAT)<n>IEAT incorporates user emotional states and their underlying causes into the model's internal reasoning process, enabling emotion-aware reasoning to be internalized rather than treated as explicit supervision.<n> Experiments on the Human-like Spoken Dialogue Systems Challenge (HumDial) Emotional Intelligence benchmark demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves top-ranked performance across emotional trajectory modeling, emotional reasoning, and empathetic response generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T14:07:30Z) - Detecting Emotional Dynamic Trajectories: An Evaluation Framework for Emotional Support in Language Models [6.810484095299127]
Emotional support is a core capability in human-AI interaction, with applications including psychological counseling, role play, and companionship.<n>Existing evaluations of large language models (LLMs) often rely on short, static dialogues and fail to capture the dynamic and long-term nature of emotional support.<n>Our framework constructs a large-scale benchmark consisting of 328 emotional contexts and 1,152 disturbance events, simulating realistic emotional shifts under evolving dialogue scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T05:47:28Z) - Evaluating Subjective Cognitive Appraisals of Emotions from Large
Language Models [47.890846082224066]
This work fills the gap by presenting CovidET-Appraisals, the most comprehensive dataset to-date that assesses 24 appraisal dimensions.
CovidET-Appraisals presents an ideal testbed to evaluate the ability of large language models to automatically assess and explain cognitive appraisals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-22T19:12:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.