SCI-Defense: Defending Manipulation Attacks from Generative Engine Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21948v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 03:28:06 GMT
• Title: SCI-Defense: Defending Manipulation Attacks from Generative Engine Optimization
• Abstract summary: We propose SCI-Defense, a three-component defense framework combining Perplexity detection, Semantic Integrity Scoring, and Inter-Candidate Detection.<n>On 600 MS MARCO web passages, String attacks are blocked with perfect recall while Review attacks yield near-zero recall, as web passages lack the persuasion-oriented signals that SIS targets in product descriptions.
• Score: 30.491360390710422
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: LLM-based ranking systems are vulnerable to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) attacks, where adversaries inject semantic signals into product descriptions to artificially boost rankings. We propose SCI-Defense, a three-component defense framework combining Perplexity detection (PPL), Semantic Integrity Scoring (SIS), and Inter-Candidate Detection (ICD). SIS evaluates four manipulation dimensions: Authority Attribution (AA), Narrative Purposiveness (NP), Comparative Claims (CA), and Temporal Claims (TC). Evaluated on 600 Amazon product descriptions across 6 categories, SCI-Defense achieves Precision=1.000 and FPR=0.000, with Recall of 1.000, 0.952, and 0.830 against String, Reasoning, and Review attacks respectively. On 600 MS MARCO web passages, String attacks are blocked with perfect recall while Review attacks yield near-zero recall, as web passages lack the persuasion-oriented signals that SIS targets in product descriptions. We demonstrate that existing defenses -- PPL-only filters, SafetyClf content classifiers, and paraphrasing -- achieve zero recall against semantic manipulation attacks. We further demonstrate new attacks such as Specification Amplification and Use-Case Saturation can expose semantic relevance manipulation as a structural defense blind spot that suggests directions for future research.

Related papers

• Stateful Cooperative Agents Safeguarding LLMs Against Evolving Multi-Turn Attacks [56.45762972211923]
  We present a proactive defense framework for securing LLMs against evolving multi-turn adversarial attacks.<n>It employs a cooperative multi-agent architecture in which specialized agents execute complementary defense strategies.<n>We present the EMRA dataset designed to simulate evolving strategies across multi-turn attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T14:04:49Z)
• Adaptive Evaluation of Out-of-Band Defenses Against Prompt Injection in LLM Agents [0.0]
  Recent work has converged on a strategy for defending tool-using LLM agents against indirect prompt injection.<n>We organize these out-of-band defenses as instances of classical integrity protection.<n>We run that protocol as an independent reproduction and extension of Progent's own adaptive-attack analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T00:35:23Z)
• AutoDojo: Adaptive Black-Box Attacks Reveal the Limits of IPI Defenses and Task-Specification Effects in LLM Agents [57.34566159148893]
  Indirect prompt injection (IPI) is a major security threat to LLM-powered agents.<n>We develop AutoDojo, an adaptive extension of AgentDojo that optimize IPI against a given defense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T02:09:08Z)
• GenTI: Benchmarking LLMs for Autonomous IDPS Rule Generation for Unseen Attacks [1.7816843507516946]
  Generative Thread Intelligence (GenTI) is a benchmark for automatic generation of IDPS rules targeting unseen attacks.<n>GTI aggregates over 150k detection and prevention rules from Snort, Suricata, Emerging Threats, as well as 50k YARA, each annotated with protocol behavior, payload signatures, contextual relationships, mappings to Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI)<n>Our GenTI instantiation achieves a composite rule-quality score of 89.4%, with 94.8% CTI coverage, improving unseen attacks detection from 45% to 87.4% and reducing the false-positive rate from 8.5%
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T08:19:52Z)
• TwinGate: Stateful Defense against Decompositional Jailbreaks in Untraceable Traffic via Asymmetric Contrastive Learning [60.68349524623048]
  Decompositional jailbreaks pose a critical threat to large language models.<n>We present TwinGate, a stateful dual-encoder defense framework.<n>We construct a comprehensive dataset of over 3.62 million instructions spanning 8,600 distinct malicious intents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T13:44:01Z)
• Prompt-Unknown Promotion Attacks against LLM-based Sequential Recommender Systems [51.504307822017985]
  Large language model-powered sequential recommender systems (LLM-SRSs) have recently demonstrated remarkable performance.<n>This paper investigates the item promotion attack in LLM-SRSs under a more realistic setting where both the system prompt and victim model are unknown to the attacker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T10:09:26Z)
• AttackEval: A Systematic Empirical Study of Prompt Injection Attack Effectiveness Against Large Language Models [0.0]
  AttackEval is a systematic empirical study of prompt injection attack effectiveness.<n>We construct a taxonomy of ten attack categories organized into three parent groups (Syntactic, Contextual, and Semantic/Social)<n>We evaluate them against a simulated production victim system under four progressively stronger defense tiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-04T05:49:30Z)
• ICL-EVADER: Zero-Query Black-Box Evasion Attacks on In-Context Learning and Their Defenses [8.57098009274006]
  In-context learning (ICL) has become a powerful, data-efficient paradigm for text classification using large language models.<n>We introduce ICL-Evader, a novel black-box evasion attack framework that operates under a highly practical zero-query threat model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T11:50:50Z)
• ReasAlign: Reasoning Enhanced Safety Alignment against Prompt Injection Attack [52.17935054046577]
  We present ReasAlign, a model-level solution to improve safety alignment against indirect prompt injection attacks.<n>ReasAlign incorporates structured reasoning steps to analyze user queries, detect conflicting instructions, and preserve the continuity of the user's intended tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T08:23:38Z)
• AI Security Beyond Core Domains: Resume Screening as a Case Study of Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Specialized LLM Applications [71.27518152526686]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at text comprehension and generation, making them ideal for automated tasks like code review and content moderation.<n>LLMs can be manipulated by "adversarial instructions" hidden in input data, such as resumes or code, causing them to deviate from their intended task.<n>This paper introduces a benchmark to assess this vulnerability in resume screening, revealing attack success rates exceeding 80% for certain attack types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T08:42:09Z)
• Securing AI Agents Against Prompt Injection Attacks [0.0]
  We present a benchmark for evaluating prompt injection risks in RAG-enabled AI agents.<n>Our framework reduces successful attack rates from 73.2% to 8.7% while maintaining 94.3% of baseline task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T10:00:54Z)
• Defending against Indirect Prompt Injection by Instruction Detection [109.30156975159561]
  InstructDetector is a novel detection-based approach that leverages the behavioral states of LLMs to identify potential IPI attacks.<n>InstructDetector achieves a detection accuracy of 99.60% in the in-domain setting and 96.90% in the out-of-domain setting, and reduces the attack success rate to just 0.03% on the BIPIA benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T13:04:45Z)
• Stealthy LLM-Driven Data Poisoning Attacks Against Embedding-Based Retrieval-Augmented Recommender Systems [16.79952669254101]
  We study provider-side data poisoning in retrieval-augmented recommender systems (RAG)<n>By modifying only a small fraction of tokens within item descriptions, an attacker can significantly promote or demote targeted items.<n>Experiments on MovieLens, using two large language model (LLM) retrieval modules, show that even subtle attacks shift final rankings and item exposures while eluding naive detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T12:53:42Z)
• Mind the Gap: Detecting Black-box Adversarial Attacks in the Making through Query Update Analysis [3.795071937009966]
  Adrial attacks can jeopardize the integrity of Machine Learning (ML) models.<n>We propose a framework that detects if an adversarial noise instance is being generated.<n>We evaluate our approach against 8 state-of-the-art attacks, including adaptive attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T20:25:12Z)
• On Trace of PGD-Like Adversarial Attacks [77.75152218980605]
  Adversarial attacks pose safety and security concerns for deep learning applications. We construct Adrial Response Characteristics (ARC) features to reflect the model's gradient consistency. Our method is intuitive, light-weighted, non-intrusive, and data-undemanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T14:26:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.