A Comparative Study of Language Models for Khmer Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22099v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 07:36:01 GMT
• Title: A Comparative Study of Language Models for Khmer Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for grounding large language model (LLM) outputs in retrieved evidence.<n>We present a RAG-based question answering system for Khmer-language telecom-domain documents.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for grounding large language model (LLM) outputs in retrieved evidence, thereby reducing hallucination and improving factual accuracy. Its efficacy, however, remains largely unexamined for low-resource, non-Latin-script languages such as Khmer. In this paper, we present a RAG-based question answering system for Khmer-language telecom-domain documents. We conduct a two-phase comparative evaluation. First, we benchmark three embedding models: BGE-M3 (567M), Jina-Embeddings-v3 (570M), and Qwen3-Embedding (597M), for dense retrieval over Khmer documents. BGE-M3 consistently performs best, achieving a Hit Rate@3 of 0.285, File Hit Rate@3 of 0.700, MRR@3 of 0.221, and Precision@3 of 0.112, substantially outperforming the other retrievers. Second, using BGE-M3 as the selected retriever, we evaluate five generator backends: Qwen3 (8B), Qwen3.5 (9B), Sailor2-8B-Chat, SeaLLMs-v3-7B-Chat, and Llama-SEA-LION-v2-8B-IT, on a curated golden dataset of 200 Khmer question-answer pairs. To quantify system performance, we apply six RAGAS-inspired metrics: faithfulness, answer relevance, context relevance, factual correctness, answer similarity, and answer correctness. The results show no single model dominates across all metrics: Qwen3.5-9B achieves the highest faithfulness (0.859) and context relevance (0.726), Qwen3-8B attains the highest factual correctness (0.380), and SeaLLMs-v3-7B-Chat performs best on answer relevance (0.867), answer similarity (0.836), and answer correctness (0.599). These findings highlight that retriever choice remains a major bottleneck for Khmer RAG, while generator strengths vary depending on whether the priority is grounding, factual precision, or semantic similarity.

Related papers

• X-KGRank: A Knowledge Graph RAG Framework for Explainable Recommendations via Pattern Mining and LLM Re-Ranking [0.0]
  X-KGRank is a knowledge graph retrieval framework that unifies structural collaborative filtering with LLM-based explanation.<n>We construct a heterogeneous knowledge graph of 9,762 nodes and 999,264 edges spanning three relation types (RATED, HAS_GENRE, and CO_RATED)<n>X-KGRank achieves NDCG@10 = 0.2956 and Recall@10 = 0.5371, improving over a strong popularity baseline by 17.1% on both metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T05:56:40Z)
• Off-the-Shelf LLMs as Process Scorers: Training-Free Alternative to PRMs for Mathematical Reasoning [51.88950852117154]
  Chunk-Level Guided Generation is a training-free alternative that uses an off-the-shelf large language model as a process scorer.<n>We show that scoring variable-length reasoning steps with large-model likelihoods is unreliable due to a systematic length bias.<n>Chunk-Level Guided Generation produces substantially shorter reasoning traces than PRM guided search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T04:43:36Z)
• Evaluation of Chunking Strategies for Effective Text Embedding in Low-Resource Language on Agricultural Documents [0.0]
  Performance is evaluated using four metrics: Average Retrieval Score (L2 distance), Answer Relevance, Khmer Coverage, and Khmer Intersection over Union.<n>We observe the best performance for the character-based Recursive chunking method with a chunk size of 300 characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T09:06:13Z)
• Adapting Large Language Models to a Low-Resource Agglutinative Language: A Comparative Study of LoRA and QLoRA for Bashkir [0.0]
  This paper presents a comparative study of parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, including LoRA and QLoRA, applied to the task of adapting large language models to the Bashkir language.<n> Experimental evaluation is conducted on a Bashkir text corpus of 71k documents (46.9M tokens) using models of various architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T14:14:35Z)
• Putting HUMANS first: Efficient LAM Evaluation with Human Preference Alignment [53.72927532626824]
  We show that subsets of just 50 examples (0.3% of data) can achieve over 0.93 Pearson correlation with full benchmark scores.<n>To better predict preferences, we trained regression models on these selected subsets, achieving 0.98 correlation.<n>This demonstrates that in regression modeling, well-curated subsets outpredict the full benchmark, showing quality over quantity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T00:57:31Z)
• Qwen3-ASR Technical Report [71.87071808763484]
  We introduce Qwen3-ASR family, which includes two powerful all-in-one speech recognition models and a novel non-autoregressive speech forced alignment model.<n>Qwen3-ASR-1.7B and Qwen3-ASR-0.6B are ASR models that support language identification and ASR for 52 languages and dialects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T06:58:13Z)
• Pushing on Multilingual Reasoning Models with Language-Mixed Chain-of-Thought [23.847410628315544]
  We introduce **Language-Mixed CoT**, a reasoning schema that switches between English and a target language.<n>We train ninve models (4B-35B) across six families (Qwen2.5, Llama-3.1, Gemma-3, etc)<n>Our best model, **KO-REAson-35B**, achieves state-of-the-art performance, with the highest overall average score (64.0 pm 25)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T14:39:41Z)
• MobileLLM-R1: Exploring the Limits of Sub-Billion Language Model Reasoners with Open Training Recipes [60.57770396565211]
  We show that strong reasoning abilities can emerge with far less data.<n>MobileLLM-R50M achieves an AIME score of 15.5, compared to just 0.6 for OLMo-2-1.48B and 0.3 for SmolLM-2-1.7B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T15:43:59Z)
• MonkeyOCR: Document Parsing with a Structure-Recognition-Relation Triplet Paradigm [60.14048367611333]
  MonkeyOCR is a vision-language model for document parsing.<n>It advances the state of the art by leveraging a Structure-Recognition-Relation (SRR) triplet paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T16:34:57Z)
• Optimized Text Embedding Models and Benchmarks for Amharic Passage Retrieval [49.1574468325115]
  We introduce Amharic-specific dense retrieval models based on pre-trained Amharic BERT and RoBERTa backbones.<n>Our proposed RoBERTa-Base-Amharic-Embed model (110M parameters) achieves a 17.6% relative improvement in MRR@10.<n>More compact variants, such as RoBERTa-Medium-Amharic-Embed (42M) remain competitive while being over 13x smaller.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T23:06:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.