Decomposing Ensemble Spread in Lorenz '96 With Learned Stochastic Parameterizations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22242v2
• Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 10:07:29 GMT
• Title: Decomposing Ensemble Spread in Lorenz '96 With Learned Stochastic Parameterizations
• Abstract summary: Operational ensemble forecasts aim to represent uncertainties through forecast spread.<n>We use the two-scale Lorenz 1996 system as a widely used, controlled testbed.<n>We show that ensemble perturbations do not increase the system's long-term variance.
• Score: 7.998429690845518
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Weather and climate forecasts are inherently uncertain due to chaotic dynamics, imperfect initial conditions, and incomplete representation of the underlying physical processes. Operational ensemble forecasts aim to represent these uncertainties through forecast spread, yet many approaches yield underdispersive estimates, with spread that grows too slowly relative to forecast error. Using the two-scale Lorenz 1996 system as a widely used, controlled testbed, we design a systematic approach to disentangle intrinsic variability, initial-condition perturbations, and stochastic model uncertainty. We compare multiple ensemble configurations and parameterization strategies, including existing deterministic and autoregressive as well as novel Bayesian and flow-based approaches. Our results show that ensemble perturbations do not increase the system's long-term variance; rather, they regulate how rapidly trajectories decorrelate and explore the invariant measure. Stochastic parameterizations, particularly those with temporally persistent structure, enhance early spread growth and improve spread-error consistency. Overall, we bring clarity to how different sources of uncertainty interact in a chaotic system and provide guidance for the design and evaluation of stochastic parameterizations in weather and climate models.

Related papers

• Covariance-Boosted Gaussian Processes for Spatiotemporal Irregularities [0.0]
  Motivated by ionospheric modeling for satellite-based augmentation systems, this paper proposes a Covariance-Boosted Gaussian Process (CBGP) framework.<n>CBGP model efficacy and robustness are demonstrated through out-of-sample testing of both simulated and real-world applications.<n>The modeling of an extensive ionospheric storm dataset over South America suggests accurate and reliable means to compute SBAS ionospheric corrections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-25T03:24:04Z)
• PnP-Corrector: A Universal Correction Framework for Coupled Spatiotemporal Forecasting [62.22445401483844]
  Existing methods are severely constrained by the bottleneck of compounding errors.<n>We propose a universal framework called -Cast-Corrector (Plug-and-Play Corrector)<n>Our method significantly enhances the long-term stability of coupled forecasting systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T13:12:33Z)
• PDE-regularized Dynamics-informed Diffusion with Uncertainty-aware Filtering for Long-Horizon Dynamics [2.1129307468437513]
  We propose a dynamics-informed diffusion framework that integrates PDE-based regularization and uncertainty-aware forecasting.<n>PDYffusion achieves superior performance in terms of CRPS and MSE, while maintaining stable uncertainty behavior measured by SSR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T07:37:38Z)
• Noise Titration: Exact Distributional Benchmarking for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting [1.5939955861266883]
  We propose a paradigm shift toward interventionist, exact-statistical benchmarking.<n>We transform forecasting from a black-box sequence matching game into an exact distributional inference task.<n>We find that state-of-the-art zero-shot models behave consistently with the context-parroting mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T17:14:11Z)
• Generative forecasting with joint probability models [2.8367488114717094]
  Chaotic dynamical systems exhibit strong sensitivity to initial conditions and often contain unresolved multiscale processes.<n>Generative models offer an appealing alternative by learning distributions over plausible system evolutions.<n>We show that joint generative models yield improved short-term predictive skill, preserve attractor geometry, and achieve substantially more accurate long-range statistical behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T20:00:09Z)
• Bridging the Gap Between Bayesian Deep Learning and Ensemble Weather Forecasts [100.26854618129039]
  Weather forecasting is fundamentally challenged by the chaotic nature of the atmosphere.<n>Recent advances in Bayesian Deep Learning (BDL) offer a promising but often disconnected alternative.<n>We bridge these paradigms through a unified hybrid BDL framework for ensemble weather forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T07:49:52Z)
• SynCast: Synergizing Contradictions in Precipitation Nowcasting via Diffusion Sequential Preference Optimization [62.958457694151384]
  We introduce preference optimization into precipitation nowcasting for the first time, motivated by the success of reinforcement learning from human feedback in large language models.<n>In the first stage, the framework focuses on reducing FAR, training the model to effectively suppress false alarms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T16:11:22Z)
• Adaptive Conformal Prediction Intervals Over Trajectory Ensembles [50.31074512684758]
  Future trajectories play an important role across domains such as autonomous driving, hurricane forecasting, and epidemic modeling.<n>We propose a unified framework based on conformal prediction that transforms sampled trajectories into calibrated prediction intervals with theoretical coverage guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T21:14:07Z)
• Predicting Forced Responses of Probability Distributions via the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem and Generative Modeling [0.0]
  We present a data-driven framework for estimating the response of higher-order moments of nonlinear systems to small external perturbations.<n>We combine GFDT with score-based generative modeling to estimate the system's score function directly from data.<n>Our method is validated on several models relevant to climate dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T20:54:33Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Traffic Forecasting: A Unified Approach [21.556559649467328]
  Uncertainty is an essential consideration for time series forecasting tasks. In this work, we focus on quantifying the uncertainty of traffic forecasting. We develop Deep S-Temporal Uncertainty Quantification (STUQ), which can estimate both aleatoric and relational uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T15:21:53Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)
• Supporting Optimal Phase Space Reconstructions Using Neural Network Architecture for Time Series Modeling [68.8204255655161]
  We propose an artificial neural network with a mechanism to implicitly learn the phase spaces properties. Our approach is either as competitive as or better than most state-of-the-art strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T21:04:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.