A Posterior-Predictive Variance Decomposition for Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in Wind Power Forecasting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22390v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 12:23:14 GMT
• Title: A Posterior-Predictive Variance Decomposition for Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in Wind Power Forecasting
• Abstract summary: This paper applies the law of total variance to the joint setting of neural network regression and Bayesian posterior approximation.<n>A wind power-specific evaluation framework is proposed to validate disentanglement without access to ground-truth uncertainty labels.<n>Across synthetic and real-world experiments, the decomposed AU and EU components respond in theoretically consistent directions.
• Score: 3.68407754316989
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Accurate wind power forecasting requires reliable uncertainty quantification, yet most existing methods report a single predictive uncertainty that conflates epistemic and aleatoric sources. This paper applies the law of total variance to the joint setting of heteroscedastic neural network regression and Bayesian posterior approximation, deriving an explicit decomposition of total uncertainty (TU) into aleatoric (AU) and epistemic (EU) components. The resulting estimators are compatible with standard posterior-approximation methods and with $β$-NLL training to regulate the mean--variance learning trade-off. A wind power--specific evaluation framework is proposed to validate disentanglement without access to ground-truth uncertainty labels, comprising three modules: controlled synthetic experiments to verify responses to heteroscedastic noise and distribution shift; data-property--driven validation on a real-world wind turbine SCADA dataset; and dataset-size scaling experiments to examine the predicted asymptotic behavior of EU. Across synthetic and real-world experiments, the decomposed AU and EU components respond in theoretically consistent directions to noise structure, distributional shift, and training-scale variation, supporting the theoretical consistency and operational utility of the proposed decomposition and evaluation protocol.

Related papers

• Neural Conjugate Aggregation: Identifiable Unsupervised Multi-Sensor Regression under Heterogeneous Sensor Bias [0.0]
  We study regression-based data fusion under uncertainty, where multiple noisy and biased measurement sources are available but ground-truth labels are absent during training.<n>This setting arises in sensor networks, simulation ensembles, and scientific monitoring systems where supervision is costly or infeasible.<n>We propose the Neural Conjugate Aggregation Model (NCAM), a hierarchical Bayesian framework that combines neural networks with conjugate Gaussian inference for unsupervised multi-source fusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-20T19:30:21Z)
• Non-Parametric Rehearsal Learning via Conditional Mean Embeddings [88.89267783967263]
  We propose a non-parametric rehearsal learning approach for textitavoiding undesired future (AUF) problems.<n>Specifically, we use kernel machinery to reformulate the AUF objective into a unified representation that disentangles desirability modeling from action-induced distributional changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-09T15:30:52Z)
• TRACE: Transport Alignment Conformal Prediction via Diffusion and Flow Matching Models [4.9352098965615]
  We study how to construct valid and informative regions for multi-dimensional outputs.<n>We measure how well a candidate output aligns with the learned generative dynamics by averaging denoising velocity or errors along transport trajectories.<n>The resulting transport-based scores are scalar-valued and can be calibrated using conformal prediction split.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T01:28:57Z)
• State estimations and noise identifications with intermittent corrupted observations via Bayesian variational inference [7.758003720510634]
  We formulate the joint estimation of system states, noise parameters, and network reliability as a Bayesian variational inference problem.<n>We propose a novel variational Bayesian adaptive Kalman filter (VB-AKF) to approximate the joint posterior probability densities of the latent parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T05:20:49Z)
• An Isotropic Approach to Efficient Uncertainty Quantification with Gradient Norms [7.439615448864818]
  We propose a lightweight method for quantifying predictive uncertainty in neural networks.<n>We use two approximations: a first-order Taylor expansion that expresses uncertainty in terms of the gradient of the prediction, and an isotropy assumption on the parameter covariance.<n>We then use the estimates to investigate when each uncertainty type carries useful signal for predicting answer correctness in question answering with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T09:13:09Z)
• Bridging the Gap Between Bayesian Deep Learning and Ensemble Weather Forecasts [100.26854618129039]
  Weather forecasting is fundamentally challenged by the chaotic nature of the atmosphere.<n>Recent advances in Bayesian Deep Learning (BDL) offer a promising but often disconnected alternative.<n>We bridge these paradigms through a unified hybrid BDL framework for ensemble weather forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T07:49:52Z)
• TULiP: Test-time Uncertainty Estimation via Linearization and Weight Perturbation [11.334867025651233]
  We propose TULiP, a theoretically-driven uncertainty estimator for OOD detection.<n>Our approach considers a hypothetical perturbation applied to the network before convergence.<n>Our method exhibits state-of-the-art performance, particularly for near-distribution samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T17:16:41Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Excess risk analysis for epistemic uncertainty with application to variational inference [110.4676591819618]
  We present a novel EU analysis in the frequentist setting, where data is generated from an unknown distribution. We show a relation between the generalization ability and the widely used EU measurements, such as the variance and entropy of the predictive distribution. We propose new variational inference that directly controls the prediction and EU evaluation performances based on the PAC-Bayesian theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-02T12:12:24Z)
• Non-Linear Spectral Dimensionality Reduction Under Uncertainty [107.01839211235583]
  We propose a new dimensionality reduction framework, called NGEU, which leverages uncertainty information and directly extends several traditional approaches. We show that the proposed NGEU formulation exhibits a global closed-form solution, and we analyze, based on the Rademacher complexity, how the underlying uncertainties theoretically affect the generalization ability of the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T19:01:33Z)
• Which Invariance Should We Transfer? A Causal Minimax Learning Approach [18.71316951734806]
  We present a comprehensive minimax analysis from a causal perspective. We propose an efficient algorithm to search for the subset with minimal worst-case risk. The effectiveness and efficiency of our methods are demonstrated on synthetic data and the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T09:07:29Z)
• Balance-Subsampled Stable Prediction [55.13512328954456]
  We propose a novel balance-subsampled stable prediction (BSSP) algorithm based on the theory of fractional factorial design. A design-theoretic analysis shows that the proposed method can reduce the confounding effects among predictors induced by the distribution shift. Numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world data sets demonstrate that our BSSP algorithm significantly outperforms the baseline methods for stable prediction across unknown test data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T07:01:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.