Cross-Species RSA Reveals Conserved Early Visual Alignment but Divergent Higher-Area Rankings Across Human fMRI and Macaque Electrophysiology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22401v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 12:31:18 GMT
• Title: Cross-Species RSA Reveals Conserved Early Visual Alignment but Divergent Higher-Area Rankings Across Human fMRI and Macaque Electrophysiology
• Abstract summary: We extend our prior finding that untrained CNNs match backpropagation at human V1 by testing the same five learning rules against macaque electrophysiology.<n>The rules are backpropagation (BP), feedback alignment (FA), predictive coding (PC), and spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP)<n>Using RSA with identical model weights from our human study, we find: (1) all models achieve higher alignment with macaque early visual cortex (rho = 0.15-0.30 at V1/V2) than with human fMRI (rho = 0.01-0.08); (2) STDP and PC produce the highest macaque V1/V2 alignment
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Does the relationship between learning rules and brain alignment generalize across species? We extend our prior finding that untrained CNNs match backpropagation at human V1 by testing the same five learning rules against macaque electrophysiology. The rules are backpropagation (BP), feedback alignment (FA), predictive coding (PC), spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), and an untrained random-weights baseline. The macaque data come from two datasets: MajajHong2015 (V4/IT, 3,200 stimulus presentations, 88/168 neurons) and FreemanZiemba2013 (V1/V2, 135 stimuli, 102/103 neurons). Using RSA with identical model weights from our human study, we find: (1) all models achieve higher alignment with macaque early visual cortex (rho = 0.15-0.30 at V1/V2) than with human fMRI (rho = 0.01-0.08), consistent with the higher signal-to-noise ratio of electrophysiology; (2) STDP and PC produce the highest macaque V1/V2 alignment (rho ~ 0.30 and 0.28), consistent with their leading position among trained rules in human V1; (3) at IT, learning rule rankings show no detectable correlation across species (Kendall's tau = 0.00, p = 1.00), though this null result is expected given that n = 5 provides power only at tau = +/-1.0, and is further confounded by stimulus set differences; (4) a pretrained ResNet-50 (ImageNet) achieves rho = 0.25 at macaque IT, substantially above all custom CNN conditions (rho = 0.07-0.14), suggesting IT alignment is limited by model capacity and training data rather than by the learning rule. Noise ceilings, multi-seed variability (5 seeds), and a stimulus-control analysis are reported. These results demonstrate that early visual alignment is robust across species, while higher-area alignment is modulated by model capacity and stimulus domain.

Related papers

• Evaluation Resolution Confounds Learning-Rule Comparisons in Model-Brain RSA of Early Visual Cortex [0.0]
  We find that a common result in this setting, that untrained or locally trained networks rival or beat backpropagation at early visual cortex, depends strongly on the resolution at which the network is evaluated.<n>Four candidate mechanisms are tested and none accounts for it: train/eval resolution matching, low-level Gabor and pixel structure, the normalization state of the untrained baseline, and convergence of the pooled descriptor toward a global brightness statistic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T15:50:58Z)
• Physics-Aware Auxiliary Losses Improve Out-of-Distribution Generalization of a GNN Synthesizability Filter [1.1986159241687198]
  We ask whether cheap, closed-form physical priors, used as auxiliary supervision on a graph neural network (GNN), improve OOD generalization.<n>We add two auxiliary losses to a GINE backbone: a topological complexity regression supervised by the Bertz index, and a strain-energy soft penalty supervised by MMFF94 force-field energy.<n>All three physics-aware variants give a small but statistically significant OOD improvement over the baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T20:21:56Z)
• Supervised Training Rapidly Degrades Early Visual Cortex Alignment Across Biologically Plausible Learning Rules [0.0]
  Random, untrained neural networks consistently match or exceed trained networks in representational similarity to early visual cortex.<n>We investigate it by tracking representational similarity analysis (RSA) alignment to human fMRI data across training for four learning rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T20:39:52Z)
• Untrained CNNs Match Backpropagation at V1: A Systematic RSA Comparison of Four Learning Rules Against Human fMRI [0.0]
  We compare four learning rules -- backpropagation (BP), feedback alignment (FA), predictive coding (PC), and spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) -- applied to identical convolutional architectures.<n>We find that early visual alignment is primarily architecture-driven, while supervised objectives drive late alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-18T06:53:35Z)
• Cross-Species Transfer Learning for Electrophysiology-to-Transcriptomics Mapping in Cortical GABAergic Interneurons [0.0]
  Single-cell electrophysiological recordings provide a powerful window into neuronal functional diversity.<n>We replicate and extend the electrophysiologytotranscriptomics framework introduced by Gouwens et al.<n>We use publicly available Allen Institute Patchseq datasets from both mouse and human cortex.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T17:23:54Z)
• Brain Tumor Classification on MRI in Light of Molecular Markers [56.99710477905796]
  Co-deletion of the 1p/19q gene is associated with clinical outcomes in low-grade gliomas.<n>This study aims to utilize a specially MRI-based convolutional neural network for brain cancer detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T07:04:26Z)
• Deep Survival Analysis from Adult and Pediatric Electrocardiograms: A Multi-center Benchmark Study [5.554864650304149]
  Artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiography (AI-ECG) shows potential for mortality prediction.<n>We evaluated model design choices across three large cohorts: Beth Israel Deaconess (MIMIC-IV), Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais (Code-15), and Boston Children's Hospital (BCH)<n>We evaluated models predicting all-cause mortality, comparing horizon-based classification and deep survival methods with neural architectures including convolutional networks and transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T14:37:17Z)
• Curriculum Based Multi-Task Learning for Parkinson's Disease Detection [2.1187904593676845]
  We leverage severity-based meta-data on the stages of disease to define a curriculum for training a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) curriculum learning is a training strategy that aims to boost classifier performance by starting with examples that are easier to classify. Even with our multi-task setting using pre-trained CNNs and transfer learning, PD classification based on T1-weighted (T1-w) MRI was challenging (ROC AUC: 0.59-0.65), but curriculum training boosted performance (by 3.9%) compared to our baseline model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T09:58:09Z)
• Boosted Dynamic Neural Networks [53.559833501288146]
  A typical EDNN has multiple prediction heads at different layers of the network backbone. To optimize the model, these prediction heads together with the network backbone are trained on every batch of training data. Treating training and testing inputs differently at the two phases will cause the mismatch between training and testing data distributions. We formulate an EDNN as an additive model inspired by gradient boosting, and propose multiple training techniques to optimize the model effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T04:23:12Z)
• High performing ensemble of convolutional neural networks for insect pest image detection [124.23179560022761]
  Pest infestation is a major cause of crop damage and lost revenues worldwide. We generate ensembles of CNNs based on different topologies. Two new Adam algorithms for deep network optimization are proposed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-28T00:49:11Z)
• Towards an Understanding of Benign Overfitting in Neural Networks [104.2956323934544]
  Modern machine learning models often employ a huge number of parameters and are typically optimized to have zero training loss. We examine how these benign overfitting phenomena occur in a two-layer neural network setting. We show that it is possible for the two-layer ReLU network interpolator to achieve a near minimax-optimal learning rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T19:08:53Z)
• eGAN: Unsupervised approach to class imbalance using transfer learning [8.100450025624443]
  Class imbalance is an inherent problem in many machine learning classification tasks. We explore an unsupervised approach to address these imbalances by leveraging transfer learning from pre-trained image classification models to encoder-based Generative Adversarial Network (eGAN) Best result of 0.69 F1-score was obtained on CIFAR-10 classification task with imbalance ratio of 1:2500.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T02:37:55Z)
• Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairs [72.1743263777693]
  Contrastive approaches to self-supervised learning (SSL) learn representations by minimizing the distance between two augmented views of the same data point. BYOL and SimSiam, show remarkable performance it without negative pairs. We study the nonlinear learning dynamics of non-contrastive SSL in simple linear networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T22:57:28Z)
• CovidDeep: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Test Based on Wearable Medical Sensors and Efficient Neural Networks [51.589769497681175]
  The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has led to a pandemic. The current testing regime based on Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction for SARS-CoV-2 has been unable to keep up with testing demands. We propose a framework called CovidDeep that combines efficient DNNs with commercially available WMSs for pervasive testing of the virus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-20T21:47:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.