LFRAG: Layout-oriented Fine-grained Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Multimodal Document Understanding
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22829v1
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:04:49 GMT
- Title: LFRAG: Layout-oriented Fine-grained Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Multimodal Document Understanding
- Abstract summary: We propose layout-oriented Fine-grained Retrieval-Augmented Generation (LFRAG), a novel framework that advances multimodal RAG from page-level to block-level retrieval.<n>With block-level late retrieval, LFRAG enables precise query-content alignment and reduces irrelevant content for downstream generation.<n>Experiments on LFDocQA demonstrate that LFRAG achieves state-of-the-art performance on retrieval tasks, outperforms the best baseline by 7.20% in answer accuracy, and reduces token consumption by 73.07% in generation tasks.
- Score: 23.227000200423458
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as an effective paradigm for enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) with external knowledge. However, existing multimodal RAG systems predominantly rely on coarse-grained page-level retrieval, which fails to capture fine-grained semantic and layout structures in visually rich documents, thereby compromising retrieval accuracy and leading to redundant context in downstream tasks. To address these issues, we propose Layout-oriented Fine-grained Retrieval-Augmented Generation (LFRAG), a novel framework that advances multimodal RAG from page-level to block-level retrieval. We perform layout segmentation to construct semantically coherent fine-grained retrieval units and design a semantic-layout fusion encoder that integrates local semantics with global context via cross-attention. With block-level late interaction retrieval, LFRAG enables precise query-content alignment and reduces irrelevant content for downstream generation. To enable rigorous evaluation, we construct LFDocQA, a large-scale benchmark with block-level annotations spanning diverse document types, designed to assess both multimodal document retrieval and question answering with greater granularity than existing datasets. Extensive experiments on LFDocQA demonstrate that LFRAG achieves state-of-the-art performance on retrieval tasks, outperforms the best baseline by 7.20% in answer accuracy, and reduces token consumption by 73.07% in generation tasks, confirming LFRAG as an accurate and efficient framework for multimodal RAG over visually rich documents. Our code and datasets will be released soon.
Related papers
- MM-BizRAG: Rethinking Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for General Purpose Enterprise Q&A [13.040489131301081]
MM-BizRAG proactively extracts and represents document structure via a document structure-aware split.<n> MM-BizRAG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art vision-centric baselines by up to 32% points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T21:31:47Z) - MLDocRAG: Multimodal Long-Context Document Retrieval Augmented Generation [3.537921035534424]
Multimodal Chunk-Query Graph (MCQG) generates semantically rich, answerable queries from heterogeneous document chunks.<n>This graph-based structure enables selective, query-centric retrieval and structured evidence aggregation.<n>Experiments on datasets MMLongBench-Doc and LongDocURL demonstrate that MLDocRAG consistently improves retrieval quality and answer accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T20:29:10Z) - MARA: A Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Document Question Answering [51.19392014547221]
Retrieval-based multimodal document QA aims to identify and integrate relevant information from visually rich documents with complex multimodal structures.<n>Current approaches rely on query-agnostic document representations that overlook salient content.<n>We propose the Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented (MARA) framework, which introduces query-adaptive generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T12:27:40Z) - Resolving Evidence Sparsity: Agentic Context Engineering for Long-Document Understanding [49.26132236798123]
Vision Language Models (VLMs) have gradually become a primary approach in document understanding.<n>We propose SLEUTH, a multi agent framework that orchestrates a retriever and four collaborative agents in a coarse to fine process.<n>The framework identifies key textual and visual clues within the retrieved pages, filters for salient visual evidence such as tables and charts, and analyzes the query to devise a reasoning strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T03:09:40Z) - URaG: Unified Retrieval and Generation in Multimodal LLMs for Efficient Long Document Understanding [55.45331924836242]
We present URaG, a framework that Unifies Retrieval and Generation within a single MLLM.<n>We show that URaG achieves state-of-the-art performance while reducing computational overhead by 44-56%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T17:54:09Z) - Scaling Beyond Context: A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Document Understanding [61.36285696607487]
Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery.<n>Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) face key limitations.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents' multimodal nature, combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-17T02:33:16Z) - MHier-RAG: Multi-Modal RAG for Visual-Rich Document Question-Answering via Hierarchical and Multi-Granularity Reasoning [5.55667293255701]
The multi-modal long-context document question-answering task aims to locate and integrate multi-modal evidences distributed across multiple pages.<n>The existing methods can be categorized into Large Vision-Language Model (LVLM)-based and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based methods.<n>A novel multi-modal RAG model, named MHier-RAG, was proposed, leveraging both textual and visual information across long-range pages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-01T12:22:53Z) - Docopilot: Improving Multimodal Models for Document-Level Understanding [87.60020625241178]
We present a high-quality document-level dataset, Doc-750K, designed to support in-depth understanding of multimodal documents.<n>This dataset includes diverse document structures, extensive cross-page dependencies, and real question-answer pairs derived from the original documents.<n>Building on the dataset, we develop a native multimodal model, Docopilot, which can accurately handle document-level dependencies without relying on RAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-19T16:03:34Z) - Hierarchical Lexical Graph for Enhanced Multi-Hop Retrieval [22.33550491040999]
RAG grounds large language models in external evidence, yet it still falters when answers must be pieced together across semantically distant documents.<n>We build two plug-and-play retrievers: StatementGraphRAG and TopicGraphRAG.<n>Our methods outperform naive chunk-based RAG achieving an average relative improvement of 23.1% in retrieval recall and correctness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T17:58:35Z) - VisDoM: Multi-Document QA with Visually Rich Elements Using Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation [100.06122876025063]
This paper introduces VisDoMBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate QA systems in multi-document settings.<n>We propose VisDoMRAG, a novel multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approach that simultaneously utilizes visual and textual RAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-14T06:24:55Z) - Multi-Head RAG: Solving Multi-Aspect Problems with LLMs [18.48202014877111]
Multi-Head RAG (MRAG) is a novel scheme for fetching multi-aspect documents.<n>We show MRAG's design advantages over 18 RAG baselines, empirical improvements of up to 20% in retrieval success ratios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T16:59:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.