Pointwise Metrics Mislead: An Evaluation Protocol for Multimodal Inverse Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22891v1
• Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 13:30:33 GMT
• Title: Pointwise Metrics Mislead: An Evaluation Protocol for Multimodal Inverse Problems
• Abstract summary: We show that the implicit assumption that lower error means better reconstruction fails structurally for inverse problems with multimodal posteriors.<n>We propose a three-part evaluation protocol where each step targets a failure mode the others miss.
• Score: 33.72751145910978
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluation in scientific reconstruction is dominated by pointwise metrics - RMSE, MAE, per-event resolution - under the implicit assumption that lower error means better reconstruction. We show that this assumption fails structurally for inverse problems with multimodal posteriors. By the law of total variance, point estimators trained to minimize MSE or MAE produce a marginal spectrum strictly narrower than the truth whenever the posterior has nonzero width. The resulting bias is independent of architecture, training, and dataset size, and it compresses precisely the spectral features - tails, modes, shapes - that downstream scientific measurements rely on. We propose a three-part evaluation protocol where each step targets a failure mode the others miss: per-event distributional accuracy via CRPS, population-level marginal accuracy via a spectrum-fidelity diagnostic, and uncertainty trustworthiness via coverage-based calibration. On a synthetic benchmark with an analytic posterior and on a realistic many-to-one inverse problem from particle physics, model rankings reverse between pointwise and distributional metrics, and calibration further separates architectures indistinguishable under CRPS. The evaluation protocol, not the model, determines the scientific conclusion.

Related papers

• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• Nonparametric Distribution Regression Re-calibration [3.0204520109309847]
  Minimizing overall prediction error encourages models to prioritize informativeness over calibration.<n>In safety-critical settings, trustworthy uncertainty estimates are often more valuable than narrow intervals.<n>We propose a novel non-parametric re-calibration algorithm based on conditional kernel mean embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T11:48:43Z)
• Post-processing optimization and optimal bounds for non-adaptive shadow tomography [0.12234742322758417]
  Overcomplete POVMs are known to outperform minimally complete measurements in many tomography and estimation tasks.<n>We formulate the choice of reconstruction coefficients as a convex minimax problem and give an algorithm with guaranteed convergence.<n> Numerical examples show that the resulting estimators can dramatically reduce sampling complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T19:01:01Z)
• MS-ISSM: Objective Quality Assessment of Point Clouds Using Multi-scale Implicit Structural Similarity [65.85858856481131]
  unstructured and irregular nature of point clouds poses a significant challenge for objective quality assessment (PCQA)<n>We propose the Multi-scale Implicit Structural Similarity Measurement (MS-ISSM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-03T14:58:52Z)
• Revisiting Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Missing Values [65.30332997607141]
  Missing values are common in real-world time series.<n>Current approaches have developed an imputation-then-prediction framework that uses imputation modules to fill in missing values, followed by forecasting on the imputed data.<n>This framework overlooks a critical issue: there is no ground truth for the missing values, making the imputation process susceptible to errors that can degrade prediction accuracy.<n>We introduce Consistency-Regularized Information Bottleneck (CRIB), a novel framework built on the Information Bottleneck principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T20:57:48Z)
• A Deep Bayesian Nonparametric Framework for Robust Mutual Information Estimation [9.68824512279232]
  Mutual Information (MI) is a crucial measure for capturing dependencies between variables.<n>We present a solution for training an MI estimator by constructing the MI loss with a finite representation of the Dirichlet process posterior to incorporate regularization.<n>We explore the application of our estimator in maximizing MI between the data space and the latent space of a variational autoencoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T21:27:48Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)
• Reducing the Variance of Variational Estimates of Mutual Information by Limiting the Critic's Hypothesis Space to RKHS [0.0]
  Mutual information (MI) is an information-theoretic measure of dependency between two random variables. Recent methods realize parametric probability distributions or critic as a neural network to approximate unknown density ratios. We argue that the high variance characteristic is due to the uncontrolled complexity of the critic's hypothesis space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T14:32:48Z)
• Amortized Conditional Normalized Maximum Likelihood: Reliable Out of Distribution Uncertainty Estimation [99.92568326314667]
  We propose the amortized conditional normalized maximum likelihood (ACNML) method as a scalable general-purpose approach for uncertainty estimation. Our algorithm builds on the conditional normalized maximum likelihood (CNML) coding scheme, which has minimax optimal properties according to the minimum description length principle. We demonstrate that ACNML compares favorably to a number of prior techniques for uncertainty estimation in terms of calibration on out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T08:04:34Z)
• Probabilistic 3D surface reconstruction from sparse MRI information [58.14653650521129]
  We present a novel probabilistic deep learning approach for concurrent 3D surface reconstruction from sparse 2D MR image data and aleatoric uncertainty prediction. Our method is capable of reconstructing large surface meshes from three quasi-orthogonal MR imaging slices from limited training sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T14:18:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.