Is TabPFN the Silver Bullet for Insurance Pricing?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22892v2
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 06:27:59 GMT
- Title: Is TabPFN the Silver Bullet for Insurance Pricing?
- Abstract summary: Tabular foundation models (TFMs) present a fundamentally different inference paradigm.<n>By pre-training on large collections of synthetic datasets, TFMs enable inference on new data through in-context learning.<n>This paper presents a first empirical evaluation of TabPFN for motor insurance pricing.
- Score: 4.5497948012757865
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Modelling claim frequency and severity for non-life insurance pricing predominantly relies on generalised linear models, with gradient-boosted machines as the leading machine learning alternative. Tabular foundation models (TFMs) present a fundamentally different inference paradigm. By pre-training on large collections of synthetic datasets, TFMs enable inference on new data through in-context learning, without any dataset-specific fitting or hyperparameter tuning. This paper presents a first empirical evaluation of TabPFN for motor insurance pricing, benchmarking it against GLM and XGBoost on two publicly available MTPL datasets. Our results show that TabPFN does not consistently outperform established baselines, exhibits substantially longer inference times, and is sensitive to the size of the in-context training set. While tabular foundation models represent a promising direction, particularly in data-scarce settings, their current performance does not offer a viable replacement for established actuarial methods.
Related papers
- Beyond IID: How General Are Tabular Foundation Models, Really? [76.03669797389378]
Research communities are increasingly evaluating foundation models on diverse datasets and tasks.<n>Standard benchmarks are mostly defined for tasks where tabular foundation models already excel.<n>We introduce BeyondArena, the first unified holistic benchmark for tabular data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T14:55:52Z) - Causal Pre-training Under the Fairness Lens: An Empirical Study of TabPFN [3.059960033014892]
We evaluate the Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN) and its fine-tuned variants.<n>Our results reveal that while TabPFN achieves stronger predictive accuracy compared to baselines, improvements in fairness are moderate and inconsistent.<n>These findings suggest that the causal pre-training in TabPFN is helpful but insufficient for algorithmic fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T17:17:12Z) - Robust Tabular Foundation Models [0.7539295827164078]
A key finding is that TFMs can be pretrained entirely on synthetic datasets.<n>We introduce an optimality gap measure, given by the difference between TFM performance and the best achievable performance.<n>These results highlight a promising new dataset for targeted adversarial training and fine-tuning of TFMs using synthetic data alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-02T23:40:39Z) - Mitra: Mixed Synthetic Priors for Enhancing Tabular Foundation Models [85.64873567417396]
We introduce Mitra, a TFM trained on a curated mixture of synthetic priors selected for their diversity, distinctiveness, and performance on real-world data.<n>Mitra consistently outperforms state-of-the-art TFMs, such as TabPFNv2 and TabICL, across both classification and regression benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T07:15:06Z) - Estimating Time Series Foundation Model Transferability via In-Context Learning [74.65355820906355]
Time series foundation models (TSFMs) offer strong zero-shot forecasting via large-scale pre-training.<n>Fine-tuning remains critical for boosting performance in domains with limited public data.<n>We introduce TimeTic, a transferability estimation framework that recasts model selection as an in-context-learning problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T07:07:13Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Tabular Prediction: Evaluating VBLL-Enhanced TabPFN in Safety-Critical Medical Data [0.0]
We evaluate the performance of VBLL integrated with the recently proposed TabPFN in uncertainty calibration.<n>Our experiments, conducted on three benchmark medical datasets, compare the performance of the original TabPFN and the VBLL-integrated version.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-12T08:24:19Z) - xRFM: Accurate, scalable, and interpretable feature learning models for tabular data [20.626069512520587]
In this work, we introduce xRFM, an algorithm that combines feature learning kernel machines with a tree structure to adapt to the local structure of the data.<n>We show that xRFM achieves best performance across $100$ regression datasets and is competitive to the best methods across $200$ classification datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T18:08:04Z) - A Closer Look at TabPFN v2: Understanding Its Strengths and Extending Its Capabilities [51.08999772842298]
Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network v2 (TabPFN v2) achieves unprecedented in-context learning performance across diverse downstream datasets.<n>We show that TabPFN v2 can infer attribute relationships even when provided with randomized attribute token inputs.<n>We demonstrate that TabPFN v2's limitations can be addressed through a test-time divide-and-context strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-24T17:38:42Z) - Zero-shot Meta-learning for Tabular Prediction Tasks with Adversarially Pre-trained Transformer [2.1677183904102257]
We present an Adversarially Pre-trained Transformer (APT) that is able to perform zero-shot meta-learning on tabular prediction tasks without pre-training on any real-world dataset.<n>APT is pre-trained with adversarial synthetic data agents, who deliberately challenge the model with different synthetic datasets.<n>We show that our framework matches state-of-the-art performance on small classification tasks without filtering on dataset characteristics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-06T23:58:11Z) - Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment [104.18002641195442]
We introduce Self-Augmented Preference Optimization (SAPO), an effective and scalable training paradigm that does not require existing paired data.
Building on the self-play concept, which autonomously generates negative responses, we further incorporate an off-policy learning pipeline to enhance data exploration and exploitation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T14:21:04Z) - TuneTables: Context Optimization for Scalable Prior-Data Fitted Networks [90.00817095558094]
Prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) make use of pretraining and in-context learning to achieve strong performance on new tasks in a single forward pass.
We introduce TuneTables, a parameter-efficient fine-tuning strategy for PFNs that compresses large datasets into a smaller learned context.
We show that TuneTables can be used as an interpretability tool and can even be used to mitigate biases by optimizing a fairness objective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T00:02:23Z) - Rethinking Pre-Training in Tabular Data: A Neighborhood Embedding Perspective [71.45945607871715]
We propose Tabular data Pre-Training via Meta-representation (TabPTM)<n>The core idea is to embed data instances into a shared feature space, where each instance is represented by its distance to a fixed number of nearest neighbors and their labels.<n>Extensive experiments on 101 datasets confirm TabPTM's effectiveness in both classification and regression tasks, with and without fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T18:03:54Z) - Revisiting Class-Incremental Learning with Pre-Trained Models: Generalizability and Adaptivity are All You Need [84.3507610522086]
Class-incremental learning (CIL) aims to adapt to emerging new classes without forgetting old ones.
Recent pre-training has achieved substantial progress, making vast pre-trained models (PTMs) accessible for CIL.
We argue that the core factors in CIL are adaptivity for model updating and generalizability for knowledge transferring.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-13T17:59:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.