Exploiting Longitudinal Context in Clinician-Verified Interactive Lesion Tracking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23118v1
• Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 00:37:49 GMT
• Title: Exploiting Longitudinal Context in Clinician-Verified Interactive Lesion Tracking
• Abstract summary: Existing methods face a fundamental trade-off: end-to-end trackers achieve high automation but offer no opportunity to correct silent tracking failures.<n>We propose a Verified Tracking paradigm: a clinician verifies a registration-proposed prompt, which the model leverages alongside the baseline lesion appearance.<n>Our model outperforms prior work in both fully automatic and the proposed verified tracking setting.
• Score: 2.597191216052101
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Tracking tumor lesions across serial CT scans is essential for oncological response assessment. Existing automated methods face a fundamental trade-off: end-to-end trackers achieve high automation but offer no opportunity to correct silent tracking failures, while decoupled registration-segmentation pipelines permit user verification yet discard the lesion's prior appearance, limiting accuracy in ambiguous cases. In this work, we propose a Verified Tracking paradigm: a clinician verifies a registration-proposed prompt, which the model leverages alongside the baseline lesion appearance to resolve segmentation ambiguities. We present a unified framework combining early spatial prompt fusion with latent temporal difference weighting for longitudinally-informed segmentation. To address data scarcity, we leverage large-scale synthetic pretraining, proving essential for exploiting longitudinal context, improving performance by up to 4.5 Dice points over training from scratch. Our approach secured first place in the MICCAI autoPET IV challenge. We further curate and release PanTrack, a new longitudinal pancreatic cancer benchmark, to assess out-of-distribution generalization. Experiments show that our model outperforms prior work in both fully automatic and the proposed verified tracking setting offering a clinically safe middle ground between automation and control. Code, model and dataset will be released at https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/LongiSeg

Related papers

• Synergistic Perception-Reasoning Governance: Grounding Medical MLLMs with Verifiable Anatomical Evidence [45.78409219344429]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show strong promise for clinical VQA and radiology report generation, yet inference-time hallucinations undermine trustworthy use.<n>We propose a holistic, training-free evidence-injection framework that systematically mitigates hallucinations through dual-side evidence injection.<n>We conduct systematic evaluations on 2 tasks and 5 datasets using textttLLaVA-1.5-7B, texttLLaVA-Med-1.5-7B, texttQwen3-VL-8B/32B, and textttInternVL
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T08:07:25Z)
• Agentic Cognitive Profiling: Realigning Automated Alzheimer's Disease Detection with Clinical Construct Validity [66.94391219005291]
  This paper proposes Agentic Cognitive Profiling (ACP), an agentic framework that realigns automated screening with clinical protocol logic.<n>Central to our design is decoupling semantic understanding from measurement by delegating all quantification to deterministic function calling.<n>ACP achieves 90.5% score match rate in task examination and 85.3% accuracy in AD prediction, surpassing popular baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T06:15:35Z)
• Suppressing Prior-Comparison Hallucinations in Radiology Report Generation via Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering [94.37535002230504]
  We develop a training-free, inference-time control framework termed Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering.<n>Our approach constructs a semantic-free intervention vector via large language model (LLM)-driven semantic decomposition.<n>We show that our approach significantly reduces the probability of historical hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T04:49:01Z)
• GAPS: A Clinically Grounded, Automated Benchmark for Evaluating AI Clinicians [32.33432636089606]
  Current benchmarks for AI clinician systems fail to capture the depth, robustness, and safety required for real-world clinical practice.<n>We introduce the GAPS framework, a multidimensional paradigm for evaluating textbfGrounding (cognitive depth), textbfAdequacy (answer completeness), textbfPerturbation (robustness), and textbfSafety.<n>We develop a fully automated, guideline-anchored pipeline to construct a GAPS-aligned benchmark end-to-end.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T16:40:28Z)
• Promptable Longitudinal Lesion Segmentation in Whole-Body CT [9.254535645473311]
  We extend the recently proposed LongiSeg framework with promptable capabilities, enabling lesion-specific tracking through point and mask interactions.<n>Our experiments show that pretraining substantially improves the ability to exploit longitudinal context, yielding an improvement of up to 6 Dice points compared to models trained from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-30T21:35:35Z)
• Unstable Prompts, Unreliable Segmentations: A Challenge for Longitudinal Lesion Analysis [0.5537760992845262]
  This paper investigates the performance of the ULS23 segmentation model in a longitudinal context.<n>We identify two critical, interconnected failure modes: a sharp degradation in segmentation quality in follow-up cases due to inter-scan registration errors, and a subsequent breakdown of the lesion correspondence process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T12:55:48Z)
• AGIR: Assessing 3D Gait Impairment with Reasoning based on LLMs [0.0]
  gait impairment plays an important role in early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment evaluation for neurodegenerative diseases.<n>Recent deep learning-based approaches have consistently improved classification accuracies, but they often lack interpretability.<n>We introduce AGIR, a novel pipeline consisting of a pre-trained VQ-VAE motion tokenizer and a Large Language Model (LLM) fine-tuned over pairs of motion tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T17:12:16Z)
• GAD: A Real-time Gait Anomaly Detection System with Online Adaptive Learning [0.0]
  Gait anomaly detection is a task that involves detecting deviations from a person's normal gait pattern. This paper introduces GAD, a real-time gait anomaly detection system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T22:43:09Z)
• Domain Adaptive Synapse Detection with Weak Point Annotations [63.97144211520869]
  We present AdaSyn, a framework for domain adaptive synapse detection with weak point annotations. In the WASPSYN challenge at I SBI 2023, our method ranks the 1st place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T05:05:53Z)
• TraSeTR: Track-to-Segment Transformer with Contrastive Query for Instance-level Instrument Segmentation in Robotic Surgery [60.439434751619736]
  We propose TraSeTR, a Track-to-Segment Transformer that exploits tracking cues to assist surgical instrument segmentation. TraSeTR jointly reasons about the instrument type, location, and identity with instance-level predictions. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated with state-of-the-art instrument type segmentation results on three public datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T05:52:18Z)
• Real-time landmark detection for precise endoscopic submucosal dissection via shape-aware relation network [51.44506007844284]
  We propose a shape-aware relation network for accurate and real-time landmark detection in endoscopic submucosal dissection surgery. We first devise an algorithm to automatically generate relation keypoint heatmaps, which intuitively represent the prior knowledge of spatial relations among landmarks. We then develop two complementary regularization schemes to progressively incorporate the prior knowledge into the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T07:57:30Z)
• Spotting adversarial samples for speaker verification by neural vocoders [102.1486475058963]
  We adopt neural vocoders to spot adversarial samples for automatic speaker verification (ASV) We find that the difference between the ASV scores for the original and re-synthesize audio is a good indicator for discrimination between genuine and adversarial samples. Our codes will be made open-source for future works to do comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T08:58:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.