The Impact of AI Coding Assistants on Software Engineering: A Longitudinal Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23135v1
• Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 01:18:39 GMT
• Title: The Impact of AI Coding Assistants on Software Engineering: A Longitudinal Study
• Abstract summary: AI coding assistants have become prolific in recent years.<n>We examined how professional software engineers perceive the effects of AI coding assistants in regard to task focus, developer experience, and productivity.
• Score: 1.8047694351309203
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI coding assistants have become prolific in recent years. Through a longitudinal mixed-methods investigation, we examined how professional software engineers perceive the effects of AI coding assistants in regard to task focus, developer experience, and productivity. Two questionnaires were administered six months apart, yielding 158 eligible participants at the first time point, 101 at the second, and a matched longitudinal cohort of 95. Participants reported spending less time on most development tasks, with 82% reporting less on writing code. We find broader shift in focus from creation to verification activities. We propose a new category of work we term supervisory engineering work, encompassing the direction, evaluation, and correction of AI output. We also identified a productivity-experience paradox: productivity perceptions held stable, with 84% reporting improvement at both time points, yet among matched participants, the proportion reporting worsened developer experience in at least one dimension nearly doubled from 14% to 27%, with flow state and cognitive load eroding while feedback loops improved. These findings suggest that AI coding assistants are impacting both the nature of software engineering work and how engineers experience it.

Related papers

• LongCLI-Bench: A Preliminary Benchmark and Study for Long-horizon Agentic Programming in Command-Line Interfaces [65.11019654023978]
  LongCLI-Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate agentic capabilities across long-horizon, realistic tasks.<n>We curated 20 high-quality, long-horizon tasks from over 1,000 computer science assignments and real-world tasks.<n>Experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art agents achieve pass rates below 20% in LongCLI-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T23:12:57Z)
• Evolving with AI: A Longitudinal Analysis of Developer Logs [3.7353323067733473]
  We study how sustained AI use reshapes actual daily coding practices in the long term.<n>We analyze five dimensions of workflow change: productivity, code quality, code editing, code reuse, and context switching.<n>Our results offer empirical insights into the silent restructuring of software and provide implications for designing future AI-augmented tooling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T10:30:24Z)
• Measuring Agents in Production [133.77818981073457]
  We present the first large-scale systematic study of AI agents in production.<n>We find that production agents are typically built using simple, controllable approaches.<n> Reliability remains the top development challenge, driven by difficulties in ensuring and evaluating agent correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T16:45:10Z)
• "Can you feel the vibes?": An exploration of novice programmer engagement with vibe coding [42.82674998306379]
  "vibe coding" refers to creating software via natural language prompts rather than direct code authorship.<n>This paper reports on a one-day educational hackathon investigating how novice programmers and mixed-experience teams engage with vibe coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T13:32:23Z)
• DeputyDev -- AI Powered Developer Assistant: Breaking the Code Review Logjam through Contextual AI to Boost Developer Productivity [38.585498338645856]
  This study investigates the implementation and efficacy of DeputyDev.<n>DeputyDev is an AI-powered code review assistant developed to address inefficiencies in the software development process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T10:09:45Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• Echoes of AI: Investigating the Downstream Effects of AI Assistants on Software Maintainability [5.677464428950146]
  This study investigates whether co-development with AI assistants affects software maintainability.<n> AI-assisted development in Phase 1 led to a modest speedup in subsequent evolution.<n>For habitual AI users, the mean speedup was 55.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T14:24:37Z)
• Towards Decoding Developer Cognition in the Age of AI Assistants [9.887133861477233]
  We propose a controlled observational study combining physiological measurements (EEG and eye tracking) with interaction data to examine developers' use of AI-assisted programming tools.<n>We will recruit professional developers to complete programming tasks both with and without AI assistance while measuring their cognitive load and task completion time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T23:25:21Z)
• Impeding LLM-assisted Cheating in Introductory Programming Assignments via Adversarial Perturbation [42.49889252988544]
  Large language model (LLM)-based programming assistants can help improve the productivity of professional software developers, but can also facilitate cheating in introductory computer programming courses. This paper investigates the baseline performance of 5 widely used LLMs on a collection of introductory programming problems, examines adversarial perturbations to degrade their performance, and describes the results of a user study aimed at understanding the efficacy of such perturbations in hindering actual code generation for introductory programming assignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T01:01:00Z)
• Does Co-Development with AI Assistants Lead to More Maintainable Code? A Registered Report [6.7428644467224]
  This study aims to examine the influence of AI assistants on software maintainability. In Phase 1, developers will add a new feature to a Java project, with or without the aid of an AI assistant. In Phase 2, a randomized controlled trial, will involve a different set of developers evolving random Phase 1 projects - working without AI assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T11:48:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.