Language Bias in LVLMs: From In-Depth Analysis to Simple and Effective Mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25036v1
• Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 12:23:13 GMT
• Title: Language Bias in LVLMs: From In-Depth Analysis to Simple and Effective Mitigation
• Abstract summary: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) extend large language models with visual understanding, but remain vulnerable to hallucination.<n>Recent studies link this issue to language bias-the tendency of LVLMs to over-rely on text while neglecting visual inputs.<n>We provide a systematic study of language bias and identify its root in modality misalignment during training.
• Score: 3.6330067010404705
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) extend large language models with visual understanding, but remain vulnerable to hallucination, where outputs are fluent yet inconsistent with images. Recent studies link this issue to language bias-the tendency of LVLMs to over-rely on text while neglecting visual inputs. Yet most analyses remain empirical without uncovering its underlying cause. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of language bias and identify its root in modality misalignment during training. Our analysis shows that both Visual Instruction Tuning (VIT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) often prioritize textual improvements, which may cause LVLMs to overly lean toward language modeling rather than balanced multimodal understanding. To address this, we propose two simple yet effective methods: Language Bias Regularization (LBR) which mitigates language bias through regularization during instruction tuning, and Language Bias Penalty (LBP), which penalizes language bias in the DPO training process. Extensive experiments across diverse models and benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. LBR consistently improves performance on over ten general benchmarks, while LBP significantly reduces hallucination and improves trustworthiness. Together, these methods not only mitigate language bias but also advance the overall alignment of LVLMs, all without introducing any additional data or auxiliary models. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/lab-klc/LVLM-Language-Bias.

Related papers

• Inference-Time Steering for Cross-Lingual Factual Consistency in LLMs [51.56484100374058]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable multilingual fluency, but their internal knowledge representations remain disproportionately biased toward high-resource languages.<n>We investigate whether these biases can be mitigated at inference time, forcing an English-prompted model to answer as if it were queried in target languages.<n>Experiments on Gemma 3 12B Instruct reveal persona prompting to be the strongest overall intervention, balancing efficacy, safety, and out-of-domain generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-21T16:15:05Z)
• Mind the Pause: Disfluency-Aware Objective Tuning for Multilingual Speech Correction with LLMs [32.94544776067079]
  ASR transcripts often contain disfluencies, such as fillers, repetitions, and false starts.<n>Most existing approaches rely on classical models that focus on identifying disfluent tokens for removal.<n>We propose a multilingual correction pipeline where a sequence tagger first marks disfluent tokens, and these signals guide instruction fine-tuning of an LLM to rewrite transcripts into fluent text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T15:11:36Z)
• Bi-directional Bias Attribution: Debiasing Large Language Models without Modifying Prompts [29.864293711943038]
  We propose a framework for detecting stereotype-inducing words and attributing neuron-level bias in large language models.<n>Our framework first identifies stereotype-inducing adjectives and nouns via comparative analysis across demographic groups.<n> Experiments on three widely used LLMs demonstrate that our method effectively reduces bias while preserving overall model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T10:27:36Z)
• Seeing to Act, Prompting to Specify: A Bayesian Factorization of Vision Language Action Policy [59.44168425139687]
  BayesVLA is a Bayesian factorization that decomposes the policy into a visual-action prior, supporting seeing-to-act, and a language-conditioned likelihood, enabling prompt-to-specify.<n>Experiments show superior generalization to unseen instructions, objects, and environments compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T01:59:23Z)
• LANPO: Bootstrapping Language and Numerical Feedback for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs [73.27182315028021]
  LANPO is a framework that cleanly separates the roles of feedback: language guides exploration, while numerical rewards drive optimization.<n>Our work provides a robust method for integrating historical experiences into the LLM RL loop, creating more effective and data-efficient learning agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T15:51:19Z)
• CausalAbstain: Enhancing Multilingual LLMs with Causal Reasoning for Trustworthy Abstention [9.76878200328024]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit knowledge disparities across languages.<n>We introduce textitCausalAbstain, a method that helps LLMs determine whether to utilize multiple generated feedback responses.<n>Experiments demonstrate that textitCausalAbstain effectively selects helpful feedback and enhances abstention decisions with interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T11:35:31Z)
• Looking Beyond Text: Reducing Language bias in Large Vision-Language Models via Multimodal Dual-Attention and Soft-Image Guidance [67.26434607115392]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved impressive results in various vision-language tasks. LVLMs suffer from hallucinations caused by language bias, leading to diminished focus on images and ineffective visual comprehension. We propose LACING to address the language bias of LVLMs with muLtimodal duAl-attention meChanIsm (MDA) aNd soft-image Guidance (IFG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T16:33:30Z)
• BiasDPO: Mitigating Bias in Language Models through Direct Preference Optimization [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become pivotal in advancing natural language processing, yet their potential to perpetuate biases poses significant concerns. This paper introduces a new framework employing Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to mitigate gender, racial, and religious biases in English text. By developing a loss function that favors less biased over biased completions, our approach cultivates a preference for respectful and non-discriminatory language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T22:32:20Z)
• Building Accurate Translation-Tailored LLMs with Language Aware Instruction Tuning [57.323716555996114]
  Off-target translation remains an unsolved problem, especially for low-resource languages. Recent works have either designed advanced prompting strategies to highlight the functionality of translation instructions or exploited the in-context learning ability of LLMs. In this work, we design a two-stage fine-tuning algorithm to improve the instruction-following ability (especially the translation direction) of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:47:40Z)
• Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models via Penalization of Language Priors [38.97645845493758]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become indispensable tools in computer vision and natural language processing.<n>Despite their advancements, our investigation reveals a noteworthy bias: the generated content is often driven more by the inherent priors of the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) than by the input image.<n>We propose two simple, training-free strategies to rectify these biases and redirect the model's focus toward visual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T12:35:07Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.