Causal Order Cannot Be An Observable

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25302v1
• Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 23:41:56 GMT
• Title: Causal Order Cannot Be An Observable
• Abstract summary: We test and compare hypotheses about causal structure empirically.<n>Can causal order be interpreted as a kind of observable?<n>We find causal classes which are sharp but violate condition 2, and classes which violate condition 3.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent developments in the formalisation of quantum causal structures have made it possible to test and compare hypotheses about causal structure empirically, rather than being a-priori assumptions. Such differences in causal structure may be leveraged to distinguish between the processes they belong to, akin to distinguishing between quantum states known to belong to different eigenspaces of an observable. So how far this analogy can be pushed? Can causal order be interpreted as a kind of observable? Can it be measured? To this end we construct a completely operational definition of observables in terms of `discrimination tasks'. This begins with some base set of classes (analogous to a quantum observable's eigenspaces) before we impose three conditions on how these classes relate under discrimination tasks. These conditions recover the properties of a standard observable, letting us apply this definition to non-state entities such as quantum processes, which naturally encode causal structure. These conditions can be described in plain language as (1) `members of any class are perfectly distinguishable from members of any other' (i.e. our classes are `sharp'), (2) `entities perfectly distinguishable pairwise are all perfectly distinguishable by a joint intervention', and (3) `if all members of a class are perfectly distinguishable from an entity, then the whole class is perfectly distinguishable from it jointly'. By analysing classes of quantum processes having strict causal orders, we find causal classes which are sharp but violate condition 2, and classes which violate condition 3. This implies that causal order cannot be an observable. We note cases in the literature which claim to prove the opposite, and discuss them. We find their analyses presume special circumstances equivalent to conditions (2) and (3), and so do not contradict our own findings.

Related papers

• Minimal operational theories: classical theories with quantum features [41.94295877935867]
  We introduce a class of probabilistic theories, where system dynamics are constrained to the minimal set of operations.<n>Specifically, the allowed instruments are limited to those derived from compositions of preparations, measurements, swap transformations, and conditional tests.<n>We demonstrate that minimal theories with conditioning and a spanning set of non-separable states satisfy two quantum no-go theorems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T16:24:09Z)
• Evolution of expected values in open quantum systems [41.94295877935867]
  We show that in some cases the power performed by the system can be considered as a quantum observable.<n>As an application, the pure dephasing process is reinterpreted from this perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T06:47:28Z)
• Are observers reducible to structures? [0.0]
  Is there a unique correspondence between observables and physical properties? I show that, if observer-like structures from all parametrizations were observers, their memory of the external world would have no correspondence with the facts, it would be no better than random guess. It has implications for structural realism, philosophy of mind, the foundations of quantum and classical physics, and quantum-first approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T14:48:50Z)
• Entanglement of observables: Quantum conditional probability approach [0.0]
  It is meaningless to speak about entanglement without pointing to the fixed observables A and B, so this is AB-entanglement. Dependence of quantum observables is formalized as non-coincidence of conditional probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T08:58:15Z)
• A Semantics for Counterfactuals in Quantum Causal Models [0.0]
  We introduce a formalism for the evaluation of counterfactual queries in the framework of quantum causal models. We define a suitable extension of Pearl's notion of a 'classical structural causal model' We show that every classical (probabilistic) structural causal model can be extended to a quantum structural causal model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T05:00:14Z)
• Witnessing Non-Classicality in a Simple Causal Structure with Three Observable Variables [0.7036032466145112]
  We analyze the Evans scenario, akin to the causal structure underlying the entanglement-swapping experiment. We prove that post-quantum correlations, analogous to the paradigmatic Popescu-Rohrlich box, do violate the constraints imposed by a classical description of Evans causal structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T23:29:35Z)
• Admissible Causal Structures and Correlations [0.0]
  We study limitations on causal structures and correlations imposed by local quantum theory. For one, we find a necessary graph theoretic criterion--the "siblings-on-cycles" property--for a causal structure to be admissible. We show that these causal models, in a restricted setting, are indeed consistent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T17:33:47Z)
• Non-standard entanglement structure of local unitary self-dual models as a saturated situation of repeatability in general probabilistic theories [61.12008553173672]
  We show the existence of infinite structures of quantum composite system such that it is self-dual with local unitary symmetry. We also show the existence of a structure of quantum composite system such that non-orthogonal states in the structure are perfectly distinguishable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T23:37:58Z)
• Nested Counterfactual Identification from Arbitrary Surrogate Experiments [95.48089725859298]
  We study the identification of nested counterfactuals from an arbitrary combination of observations and experiments. Specifically, we prove the counterfactual unnesting theorem (CUT), which allows one to map arbitrary nested counterfactuals to unnested ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T12:51:04Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
  Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon. We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space. The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.