Testing the Deliteralization Hypothesis in Human and Machine Translation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25686v1
• Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 10:40:34 GMT
• Title: Testing the Deliteralization Hypothesis in Human and Machine Translation
• Abstract summary: We test the claim that translations become progressively less literal as they are drafted and revised.<n>We compare the literality of human translations and post-editions to that of two NMT systems and six LLMs across 54 language pairs.<n>We find that (i) human translations remain significantly less literal than those of all tested MT systems, though recent LLMs narrow the gap.
• Score: 23.7663178803576
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The recent shift from dedicated NMT systems to general-purpose LLMs has reshaped machine translation, with LLMs reported to produce more fluent, less literal output than their predecessors. We test whether this shift extends to the deliteralization hypothesis, the long-standing claim from translation studies that translations become progressively less literal as they are drafted and revised. Using the WMT24++ dataset, we compare the literality of human translations and post-editions to that of two NMT systems and six LLMs across 54 language pairs and three tasks: direct translation, iterative self-revision, and post-editing of human drafts. Literality is measured via a validated Synthetic Literality Index built from six heuristics. We find that (i) human translations remain significantly less literal than those of all tested MT systems, though recent LLMs narrow the gap; (ii) when prompted to iteratively revise their own output, LLMs deliteralize monotonically, providing the first evidence that the hypothesis applies natively to LLM generation; and (iii) as post-editors, LLMs invert the revision triggers of human post-editors, tolerating literal drafts and targeting idiomatic human formulations for revision.

Related papers

• Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMs [51.04435855143767]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in machine translation.<n>However, translationese, characterized by overly literal and unnatural translations, remains a persistent challenge.<n>We introduce methods to mitigate these biases, including polishing golden references and filtering unnatural training instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T12:14:45Z)
• Automatic Input Rewriting Improves Translation with Large Language Models [24.855336353977382]
  Machine translation (MT) users rely on intuition that well-written text is easier to translate when using off-the-shelf MT systems.<n>We show that text simplification is the most effective MT-agnostic rewrite strategy.<n>Human evaluation confirms that simplified rewrites and their MT outputs both largely preserve the original meaning of the source and MT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T18:56:56Z)
• Refining Translations with LLMs: A Constraint-Aware Iterative Prompting Approach [7.5069214839655345]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in machine translation (MT) We propose a multi-step prompt chain that enhances translation faithfulness by prioritizing key terms crucial for semantic accuracy. Experiments using Llama and Qwen as base models on the FLORES-200 and WMT datasets demonstrate significant improvements over baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T05:40:24Z)
• Language Models and Cycle Consistency for Self-Reflective Machine Translation [1.79487674052027]
  We generate multiple translation candidates from a source language A to a target language B, and subsequently translate these candidates back to the original language A. By evaluating the cycle consistency between the original and back-translated sentences using metrics such as token-level precision and accuracy, we implicitly estimate the translation quality in language B. For each source sentence, we identify the translation candidate with optimal cycle consistency with the original sentence as the final answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T04:01:41Z)
• TasTe: Teaching Large Language Models to Translate through Self-Reflection [82.83958470745381]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable performance in various natural language processing tasks. We propose the TasTe framework, which stands for translating through self-reflection. The evaluation results in four language directions on the WMT22 benchmark reveal the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:21:21Z)
• (Perhaps) Beyond Human Translation: Harnessing Multi-Agent Collaboration for Translating Ultra-Long Literary Texts [56.7988577327046]
  We introduce TransAgents, a novel multi-agent framework that simulates the roles and collaborative practices of a human translation company.<n>Our findings highlight the potential of multi-agent collaboration in enhancing translation quality, particularly for longer texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T05:55:08Z)
• Building Accurate Translation-Tailored LLMs with Language Aware Instruction Tuning [57.323716555996114]
  Off-target translation remains an unsolved problem, especially for low-resource languages. Recent works have either designed advanced prompting strategies to highlight the functionality of translation instructions or exploited the in-context learning ability of LLMs. In this work, we design a two-stage fine-tuning algorithm to improve the instruction-following ability (especially the translation direction) of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:47:40Z)
• TEaR: Improving LLM-based Machine Translation with Systematic Self-Refinement [26.26493253161022]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results in Machine Translation (MT) We introduce a systematic LLM-based self-refinement translation framework, named textbfTEaR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:58:12Z)
• Salute the Classic: Revisiting Challenges of Machine Translation in the Age of Large Language Models [91.6543868677356]
  The evolution of Neural Machine Translation has been influenced by six core challenges. These challenges include domain mismatch, amount of parallel data, rare word prediction, translation of long sentences, attention model as word alignment, and sub-optimal beam search. This study revisits these challenges, offering insights into their ongoing relevance in the context of advanced Large Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T13:30:09Z)
• Adapting Large Language Models for Document-Level Machine Translation [46.370862171452444]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Recent research indicates that moderately-sized LLMs often outperform larger ones after task-specific fine-tuning. This study focuses on adapting LLMs for document-level machine translation (DocMT) for specific language pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T09:29:13Z)
• Towards Effective Disambiguation for Machine Translation with Large Language Models [65.80775710657672]
  We study the capabilities of large language models to translate "ambiguous sentences" Experiments show that our methods can match or outperform state-of-the-art systems such as DeepL and NLLB in four out of five language directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T22:22:52Z)
• Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysis [103.89753784762445]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in handling multilingual machine translation (MMT) This paper systematically investigates the advantages and challenges of LLMs for MMT. We thoroughly evaluate eight popular LLMs, including ChatGPT and GPT-4.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:51:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.