When Can We Trust Early Warnings? Leakage-Excluded Early Outcome Prediction from LMS Interaction Logs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25794v1
• Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 12:41:40 GMT
• Title: When Can We Trust Early Warnings? Leakage-Excluded Early Outcome Prediction from LMS Interaction Logs
• Abstract summary: We formalize cutoff-based early outcome prediction under a temporal availability constraint and introduce LEAP.<n>LEAP enforces cutoff-first truncation prior to joins and aggregation and audits feature provenance to prevent post-cutoff evidence from entering the benchmark.<n>Results show improving performance as the observation window expands, with a marked gain around week3.
• Score: 26.702635306128865
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Early-warning models built from Learning Management System (LMS) logs aim to predict end-of-course outcomes early enough to enable timely learner support. However, reported "early" performance is often inflated by temporal leakage. This occurs when the pipeline uses information that would not yet be available at the time of prediction. We formalize cutoff-based early outcome prediction under a temporal availability constraint and introduce LEAP (Leakage-Excluded Early-Availability Protocol), which enforces cutoff-first truncation prior to joins and aggregation and audits feature provenance to prevent post-cutoff evidence from entering the benchmark. We instantiate LEAP on the public Open University Learning Analytics Dataset (OULAD) as a multi-step protocol for leakage-controlled evaluation across weekly cutoffs. Using several standard learning methods, we evaluate performance using ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, Brier score, and F1@0.5. Results show improving performance as the observation window expands, with a marked gain around week~3; Random Forest performs best at the earliest cutoffs, while Gradient Boosting dominates thereafter. Leakage ablations further show that temporal violations, especially through assessment information, can inflate apparent "early" performance.

Related papers

• Forecasting Supply Chain Disruptions with Foresight Learning [0.0]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework that trains LLMs to produce calibrated probabilistic forecasts using realized disruption outcomes as supervision.<n>The resulting model substantially outperforms strong baselines on accuracy, calibration, and precision.<n>Results suggest a general pathway for training domain-specific forecasting models that produce decision-ready signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T18:04:34Z)
• Long-Term Outlier Prediction Through Outlier Score Modeling [11.050517940486857]
  This study addresses an important gap in time series outlier detection by proposing a novel problem setting: long-term outlier prediction.<n> Conventional methods primarily focus on immediate detection by identifying deviations from normal patterns.<n>We propose a simple and unsupervised two-layer method that is independent of specific models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T00:24:42Z)
• Forecasting Anomaly Precursors via Uncertainty-Aware Time-Series Ensembles [9.53248032827498]
  We propose FATE (Forecasting Anomalies with Time-series Ensembles), a novel unsupervised framework for detecting Precursors-of-Anomaly (PoA)<n>FATE anticipates future values and leverages ensemble disagreement to signal early signs of potential anomalies without access to target values at inference time.<n>Experiments on five real-world benchmark datasets show that FATE achieves an average improvement of 19.9 percentage points in PTaPR AUC and 20.02 percentage points in early detection F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T02:48:09Z)
• Can Prompts Rewind Time for LLMs? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Prompted Knowledge Cutoffs [31.64130018833542]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used for temporal prediction, but their reliance on pretraining data raises contamination concerns.<n>We investigate the capability of prompting to simulate earlier knowledge cutoff in LLMs.<n>Results demonstrate that while prompt-based simulated knowledge cutoffs show effectiveness when directly queried with the information after that date, they struggle to induce forgetting when the forgotten content is not directly asked but causally related to the query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T20:37:44Z)
• Mitigating Spurious Correlations in LLMs via Causality-Aware Post-Training [57.03005244917803]
  Large language models (LLMs) often fail on out-of-distribution (OOD) samples due to spurious correlations acquired during pre-training.<n>Here, we aim to mitigate such spurious correlations through causality-aware post-training (CAPT)<n> Experiments on the formal causal inference benchmark CLadder and the logical reasoning dataset PrOntoQA show that 3B-scale language models fine-tuned with CAPT can outperform both traditional SFT and larger LLMs on in-distribution (ID) and OOD tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T06:30:28Z)
• Improving Prediction Certainty Estimation for Reliable Early Exiting via Null Space Projection [16.838728310658105]
  We propose a novel early exiting method based on the Certainty-Aware Probability (CAP) score.<n>We show that our method can achieve an average speed-up ratio of 2.19x across all tasks with negligible performance degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T05:08:34Z)
• Rethinking Metrics and Benchmarks of Video Anomaly Detection [58.37571339811799]
  Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) aims to detect anomalies that deviate from expectation.<n>Existing VAD metrics are influenced by single annotation bias.<n>Existing benchmarks lack the capability to evaluate scene overfitting of fully/weakly-supervised algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T08:09:42Z)
• The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning Models [69.798277882245]
  We introduce Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning (UPFT) to enhance large language models' reasoning efficiency.<n>UPFT removes the need for labeled data or exhaustive sampling.<n> Experiments show that UPFT matches the performance of supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T18:56:03Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• Improving Event Duration Prediction via Time-aware Pre-training [90.74988936678723]
  We introduce two effective models for duration prediction. One model predicts the range/unit where the duration value falls in (R-pred); and the other predicts the exact duration value E-pred. Our best model -- E-pred, substantially outperforms previous work, and captures duration information more accurately than R-pred.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T01:52:11Z)
• Predicting MOOCs Dropout Using Only Two Easily Obtainable Features from the First Week's Activities [56.1344233010643]
  Several features are considered to contribute towards learner attrition or lack of interest, which may lead to disengagement or total dropout. This study aims to predict dropout early-on, from the first week, by comparing several machine-learning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T10:44:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.