Managing Uncertainty in LLM-Generated Procedural Knowledge for Virtual Laboratory Planning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26333v1
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 21:12:47 GMT
- Title: Managing Uncertainty in LLM-Generated Procedural Knowledge for Virtual Laboratory Planning
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a prototype framework for managing uncertainty in LLM-generated procedural knowledge for virtu-al laboratory planning.<n>The framework aims to reduce procedural uncertainty by using structured domain representations and uncertain LLM-generated state-transition samples.<n>We illustrate the approach in a virtual laboratory domain involving laboratory instruments, containers, tools, and material-transfer actions.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Educational virtual laboratories can make experimental training more scala-ble, adaptive, and accessible, especially when students have limited access to physical laboratory facilities. However, authoring new simulated laboratory procedures remains costly: educators must describe new equipment, define how instruments and materials interact, and specify valid procedural flows that can be executed or assessed inside the virtual environment. Large lan-guage models can assist in this authoring process by generating detailed ex-perimental procedures, but their output should not be treated as directly exe-cutable plans. They may omit necessary actions, arrange steps in the wrong order, or produce instructions that are logically incorrect or incompatible with the laboratory equipment. This paper presents a prototype framework for managing uncertainty in LLM-generated procedural knowledge for virtu-al laboratory planning. The framework aims to reduce procedural uncertainty by using structured domain representations and uncertain LLM-generated state-transition samples to extract candidate procedural rules, transform them into explicit and inspectable constraints, and use them to repair uncertain procedural steps. Although the motivating domain refers to educational vir-tual laboratories, the underlying problem is more general: managing uncer-tain procedural knowledge for action planning in structured interactive envi-ronments. We illustrate the approach in a virtual laboratory domain involving laboratory instruments, containers, tools, and material-transfer actions.
Related papers
- Labimus: A Simulation and Benchmark for Humanoid Dexterous Manipulation in Chemical Laboratory [47.77200587195896]
Labimus is the first benchmark for humanoid dexterous manipulation in organic chemistry laboratories.<n>It reconstructs over 30 functionally faithful assets from real organic chemistry workstations through real-to-sim modeling.<n>We introduce a precision-aware evaluation protocol designed to jointly measure task completion, experimental precision, and long-horizon execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-30T02:14:28Z) - LabVLA: Grounding Vision-Language-Action Models in Scientific Laboratories [95.20367571157679]
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide one possible interface between written protocols and robot execution.<n>Existing policies are trained mostly on household and tabletop demonstrations and rarely encounter the instruments, transparent liquids, or fixed protocol found in scientific laboratories.<n>We present LabVLA, trained with a two-stage recipe: FAST action token pretraining first makes the Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct backbone action aware before any continuous control is learned, and flow matching posttraining then attaches a DiT action expert under knowledge insulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-11T17:03:53Z) - BioProVLA-Agent: An Affordable, Protocol-Driven, Vision-Enhanced VLA-Enabled Embodied Multi-Agent System with Closed-Loop-Capable Reasoning for Biological Laboratory Manipulation [15.461936066333633]
BioProVLA-Agent is a protocol-driven, vision-enhanced embodied multi-agent system for biological manipulation.<n>It integrates protocol parsing, visual state verification, and embodied execution in a closed-loop workflow.<n>We evaluate the system on a hierarchical benchmark covering 15 atomic tasks, 6 composite tasks, and 3 bimanual tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T06:15:40Z) - LabBuilder: Protocol-Grounded 3D Layout Generation for Interactable and Safe Laboratory [93.63620478256063]
We present LabBuilder, an end-to-end system that generates and verifies 3D laboratory layouts from concise textual specifications.<n>LabBuilder significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T07:24:56Z) - Sci-VLA: Agentic VLA Inference Plugin for Long-Horizon Tasks in Scientific Experiments [49.02509634515056]
Recent vision-language-action models offer a promising foundation for robotic laboratories.<n>Experiments typically involve long-horizon tasks composed of multiple atomic tasks.<n>While VLA models fine-tuned for scientific tasks can reliably execute atomic experimental actions, they often fail to perform composite tasks formed by reordering and composing these known atomic actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T05:50:19Z) - CAPER: Constrained and Procedural Reasoning for Robotic Scientific Experiments [8.099293110920486]
We propose CAPER, a framework for Constrained And ProcEdural Reasoning for robotic scientific experiments.<n>By encoding procedural commitments through interpretable intermediate representations, CAPER prevents execution-time violations of experimental logic.<n> Experiments on a scientific workflow benchmark and a public long-horizon manipulation dataset demonstrate consistent improvements in success rate and procedural correctness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T03:18:41Z) - PRISM: Protocol Refinement through Intelligent Simulation Modeling [4.839327116611717]
We introduce PRISM, a framework that automates the design, validation, and execution of experimental protocols.<n>PRISM uses a set of language-model-based agents that work together to generate and refine experimental steps.<n>We demonstrate PRISM as a practical end-to-end workflow that bridges language-based protocol generation, simulation-based validation, and automated robotic execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T20:15:28Z) - LabUtopia: High-Fidelity Simulation and Hierarchical Benchmark for Scientific Embodied Agents [103.65422553044816]
LabUtopia is a comprehensive simulation and benchmarking suite designed to facilitate the development of generalizable, reasoning-capable embodied agents.<n>It supports 30 distinct tasks and includes more than 200 scene and instrument assets.<n>We demonstrate that LabUtopia offers a powerful platform for advancing the integration of perception, planning, and control in scientific-purpose agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T17:50:53Z) - ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language
Models [68.57918965060787]
Large language models (LLMs) can be used to score potential next actions during task planning.
We present a programmatic LLM prompt structure that enables plan generation functional across situated environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-22T20:29:49Z) - Chain of Thought Imitation with Procedure Cloning [129.62135987416164]
We propose procedure cloning, which applies supervised sequence prediction to imitate the series of expert computations.
We show that imitating the intermediate computations of an expert's behavior enables procedure cloning to learn policies exhibiting significant generalization to unseen environment configurations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-22T13:14:09Z) - Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge
for Embodied Agents [111.33545170562337]
We investigate the possibility of grounding high-level tasks, expressed in natural language, to a chosen set of actionable steps.
We find that if pre-trained LMs are large enough and prompted appropriately, they can effectively decompose high-level tasks into low-level plans.
We propose a procedure that conditions on existing demonstrations and semantically translates the plans to admissible actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-18T18:59:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.