Cultural Value Alignment Via Latent Activation Steering in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26365v1
• Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 22:20:52 GMT
• Title: Cultural Value Alignment Via Latent Activation Steering in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We propose a generalizable framework for cultural evaluation and intervention.<n>By extracting implicit token probabilities across 300 situational dilemmas, we bypass surface-level alignment.<n>We find substantial variation in adaptability and uncover a consistent phenomenon of latent entanglement.
• Score: 4.181458436156503
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit homogenized cultural perspectives. While the World Values Survey (WVS) provides a gold standard for mapping human values, traditional direct prompting of LLMs on WVS often fails to access the model's latent cultural depth, leading to safety-aligned refusals or neutral responses. Here, we propose a generalizable framework for cultural evaluation and intervention that transitions from abstract queries to scenario-based behavioral probing. By extracting implicit token probabilities across 300 situational dilemmas, we bypass surface-level alignment to map the latent coordinates of LLMs cultural value. We further introduce activation steering to shift these internal alignments during the forward pass without retraining. Across multiple LLMs, we find substantial variation in adaptability and uncover a consistent phenomenon of latent entanglement, where interventions along one cultural dimension induce shifts along another. These results suggest that cultural values are encoded as coupled structures, limiting precise alignment. This work establishes a computationally efficient framework for cultural steering, highlighting the structural complexities when navigating global value with LLMs.

Related papers

• Aligned but Flattened: Analyzing the Trade-off between Cultural Alignment and Diversity in LLMs [17.222006783561426]
  We show that the pursuit of cultural alignment consistently incurs an acute expense of diversity, leading to severe "cultural flattening"<n>Our findings expose the limitations of current post-training paradigms and call for a shift toward alignment objectives that preserve cross-cultural pluralism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T01:59:29Z)
• Scenario-based Probing and Steering Cultural Values in Large Language Models--Extended Version [5.97627108250811]
  We propose a framework for probing and steering latent cultural representations in large language models.<n>By translating social value questions into scenario-based behavioral dilemmas, we extract token-level probabilities to measure implicit values.<n>We find substantial variation in steerability and identify latent entanglement, where interventions along one cultural dimension shifts along another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T19:44:23Z)
• Distributional Open-Ended Evaluation of LLM Cultural Value Alignment Based on Value Codebook [50.10594064510559]
  DOVE is a distributional evaluation framework that directly compares human-written text with LLM-generated outputs.<n>We show that DOVE achieves superior predictive validity, attaining a 31.56% correlation with downstream tasks, while maintaining high reliability with as few as 500 samples per culture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T08:33:10Z)
• Do Large Language Models Truly Understand Cross-cultural Differences? [53.481048019144644]
  We develop a scenario-based benchmark to evaluate large language models' cross-cultural understanding and reasoning.<n>Grounded in cultural theory, we categorize cross-cultural capabilities into nine dimensions.<n>The dataset supports continuous expansion, and experiments confirm its transferability to other languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T01:21:58Z)
• CultureScope: A Dimensional Lens for Probing Cultural Understanding in LLMs [57.653830744706305]
  CultureScope is the most comprehensive evaluation framework to date for assessing cultural understanding in large language models.<n>Inspired by the cultural iceberg theory, we design a novel dimensional schema for cultural knowledge classification.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our method can effectively evaluate cultural understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T17:47:48Z)
• From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Test [50.51344198689069]
  We extend the human-centered word association test (WAT) to assess the alignment of large language models with cross-cultural cognition.<n>To address culture preference, we propose CultureSteer, an innovative approach by embedding cultural-specific semantic associations directly within the model's internal representation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T07:05:10Z)
• From Surveys to Narratives: Rethinking Cultural Value Adaptation in LLMs [62.9861554207279]
  Adapting cultural values in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents significant challenges.<n>Prior work primarily aligns LLMs with different cultural values using World Values Survey (WVS) data.<n>We investigate WVS-based training for cultural value adaptation and find that relying solely on survey data cane cultural norms and interfere with factual knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:00:01Z)
• Cultural Learning-Based Culture Adaptation of Language Models [70.1063219524999]
  Adapting large language models (LLMs) to diverse cultural values is a challenging task.<n>We present CLCA, a novel framework for enhancing LLM alignment with cultural values based on cultural learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T18:16:26Z)
• Randomness, Not Representation: The Unreliability of Evaluating Cultural Alignment in LLMs [7.802103248428407]
  We identify and test three assumptions behind current survey-based evaluation methods.<n>We find a high level of instability across presentation formats, incoherence between evaluated versus held-out cultural dimensions, and erratic behavior under prompt steering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:59:53Z)
• Break the Checkbox: Challenging Closed-Style Evaluations of Cultural Alignment in LLMs [18.84720654437447]
  A large number of studies rely on closed-style multiple-choice surveys to evaluate cultural alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>In this work, we challenge this constrained evaluation paradigm and explore more realistic, unconstrained approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T01:04:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.