The Labyrinth and the Thread: Rethinking Regularizations in Sequential Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26670v1
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 08:07:25 GMT
• Title: The Labyrinth and the Thread: Rethinking Regularizations in Sequential Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We first analyze the empirical success of AlphaEdit and establish, via a rigorous optimization analysis, the formal equivalence between one-time and sequential editing.<n>We empirically confirm that many commonly used regularization strategies are unnecessary for reliable sequential updates.<n>Our work provides Ariadne's thread through the labyrinth of sequential editing, charting a path toward simpler, more interpretable, and dependable knowledge updates.
• Score: 15.376868559569623
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Sequential editing of structured knowledge in large language models allows targeted factual updates without retraining, yet existing methods often rely on complex regularization or constraint mechanisms whose necessity remains unclear. In this work, we systematically investigate the mechanisms underlying effective and stable sequential editing. Specifically, we first analyze the empirical success of AlphaEdit and establish, via a rigorous optimization analysis, the formal equivalence between one-time and sequential editing. Building on this insight, we generalize the equivalence to a broader class of editing objectives, demonstrating that stability emerges naturally from properly accounting for accumulated editing constraints, rather than from specialized regularization or null-space operations. We empirically confirm that many commonly used regularization strategies are unnecessary for reliable sequential updates. Furthermore, we extend our framework to handle conflicting edits, ensuring robust and consistent behavior under contradictory updates. Ultimately, our work provides Ariadne's thread through the labyrinth of sequential editing, charting a path toward simpler, more interpretable, and dependable knowledge updates. Our code is available at https://github.com/Wangzzzzzzzz/OTE-SE-Alignment.

Related papers

• AnyEdit++: Adaptive Long-Form Knowledge Editing via Bayesian Surprise [10.675226603704937]
  We present AnyEdit++, a structure-aware framework incorporating Bayes-Chunk.<n>We show that AnyEdit++ achieves superior performance and robustness compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-31T06:48:43Z)
• The Anatomy of an Edit: Mechanism-Guided Activation Steering for Knowledge Editing [52.315369633116255]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as knowledge bases, but keeping them up to date requires targeted knowledge editing (KE)<n>We take a mechanistic view of KE using neuron-level knowledge attribution (NLKA)<n>Across representative KE methods, we find a consistent pattern: mid-to-late attention predominantly promotes the new target, while attention and FFN modules cooperate to suppress the original fact.<n>Motivated by these findings, we propose MEGA, a MEchanism-Guided Activation steering method that performs attention-residual interventions in attribution-aligned regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T12:40:15Z)
• Spectral Characterization and Mitigation of Sequential Knowledge Editing Collapse [44.49646322759214]
  We show that a model's general abilities are closely associated with dominant singular directions of pretrained weight matrices.<n>We propose REVIVE, a plug-and-play framework that stabilizes sequential editing by explicitly preserving the dominant singular subspace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T07:18:14Z)
• EvoEdit: Evolving Null-space Alignment for Robust and Efficient Knowledge Editing [19.834477925624658]
  Large language models (LLMs) require continual updates to rectify outdated or erroneous knowledge.<n>Existing approaches are mainly based on a locate-then-edit framework.<n>We introduce EvoEdit, a novel editing strategy that mitigates catastrophic interference through sequential null-space alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T21:36:14Z)
• Energy-Regularized Sequential Model Editing on Hyperspheres [59.47007547581175]
  Large language models (LLMs) require constant updates to remain aligned with evolving real-world knowledge.<n> sequential editing often destabilizes representations and induces catastrophic forgetting.<n>We propose SPHERE (Sparse Projection for Hyperspherical Energy-Regularized Editing), an HE-driven regularization strategy that stabilizes neuron weight distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T17:55:43Z)
• Is Model Editing Built on Sand? Revealing Its Illusory Success and Fragile Foundation [50.40861036534546]
  Large language models (LLMs) inevitably encode outdated or incorrect knowledge. Updating, deleting, and forgetting such knowledge is important for alignment, safety, and other issues.<n>To address this issue, model editing has emerged as a promising paradigm: by precisely editing a small subset of parameters such that a specific fact is updated while preserving other knowledge.<n>Despite its great success reported in previous papers, we find the apparent reliability of editing rests on a fragile foundation.<n>Our empirical evidence shows that editing is likely to be based on shortcuts rather than full semantics, calling for an urgent reconsideration of the very basis of model editing before further advancements can
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T07:59:23Z)
• MEMOIR: Lifelong Model Editing with Minimal Overwrite and Informed Retention for LLMs [76.28901550926021]
  Existing methods for lifelong model editing compromise generalization, interfere with past edits, or fail to scale to long editing sequences.<n>We propose MEMOIR, a novel scalable framework that injects knowledge through a residual memory, while preserving the core capabilities of the pre-trained model.<n>MeMOIR achieves state-of-the-art performance across reliability, generalization, and locality metrics, scaling to thousands of sequential edits with minimal forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T16:16:42Z)
• LyapLock: Bounded Knowledge Preservation in Sequential Large Language Model Editing [28.870053452479443]
  Current locate-then-edit approaches exhibit a progressive performance decline during sequential editing.<n>textbfLyapLock is proposed to decompose the long-term constrained programming into tractable stepwise subproblems for efficient solving.<n> Experimental results show that our framework scales sequential editing capacity to over 10,000 edits while stabilizing general capabilities and boosting average editing efficacy by 11.89% over SOTA baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T16:16:33Z)
• AnyEdit: Edit Any Knowledge Encoded in Language Models [76.28789588247659]
  We propose AnyEdit, a new autoregressive editing paradigm for large language models (LLMs)<n>It decomposes long-form knowledge into sequential chunks and iteratively edits the key token in each chunk, ensuring consistent and accurate outputs.<n>It outperforms strong baselines by 21.5% on benchmarks including UnKEBench, AKEW, and our new EditEverything dataset for long-form diverse-formatted knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T16:18:37Z)
• Knowledge Editing through Chain-of-Thought [31.230769348268282]
  In-context editing is a technique that updates large language models (LLMs) with new information to maintain their world knowledge.<n>Despite its potential, existing in-context knowledge editing methods are often task-specific.<n>We propose EditCoT, a novel knowledge editing framework that flexibly and efficiently updates LLMs across various tasks without retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T17:17:50Z)
• EVEDIT: Event-based Knowledge Editing with Deductive Editing Boundaries [69.72012539060731]
  We introduce a theoretical framework for efficient knowledge editing (KE) in large language models (LLMs) We propose a novel task of event-based knowledge editing that pairs facts with event descriptions. We empirically demonstrate the superiority of event-based editing over the existing setting on resolving uncertainty in edited models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T16:34:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.