Beyond Questions: Evaluating What Large Language Models (Actually) Know

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26937v1
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 12:29:18 GMT
• Title: Beyond Questions: Evaluating What Large Language Models (Actually) Know
• Abstract summary: We introduce open knowledge evaluation, a new paradigm for knowledge benchmarking.<n>Instead of asking narrow questions, it evaluates models on the knowledge they choose to surface in response to open-ended elicitation prompts.<n>We instantiate this paradigm with BeQu, a benchmark of 10,000 entities paired with reference corpora for statement verification.
• Score: 7.018070351055396
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Parametric knowledge in large language models (LLMs) is a cornerstone of their success, yet remains poorly understood. Existing knowledge benchmarks typically rely on predefined questions (e.g., "What is the birth date of M.L. King?"), evaluating only knowledge that benchmark designers explicitly choose to query, a problematic availability bias. In this paper, we introduce open knowledge evaluation, a new paradigm for LLM knowledge benchmarking. Instead of asking narrow questions, it evaluates models on the knowledge they choose to surface in response to open-ended elicitation prompts (e.g., "Tell me everything you know about M.L. King"). This shifts the focus from predefined answer retrieval toward characterizing the knowledge models naturally express. We instantiate this paradigm with BeQu (Beyond Questions), a benchmark of 10,000 entities paired with reference corpora for statement verification. Using BeQu, we evaluate a broad range of language models and analyze the effects of reasoning effort, model scale, prompt format, and knowledge domain. Data and leaderboard are available on this work's GitHub repository and at the benchmark's website.

Related papers

• Inside-Out: Hidden Factual Knowledge in LLMs [50.79758420289131]
  This work presents a framework for assessing whether large language models (LLMs) encode more factual knowledge in their parameters than what they express in their outputs.<n>We first propose a formal definition of knowledge, quantifying it for a given question as the fraction of correct-incorrect answer pairs where the correct one is ranked higher.<n>We then present a case study, applying this framework to three popular open-weights LLMs in a closed-book QA setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T15:21:48Z)
• Establishing Knowledge Preference in Language Models [80.70632813935644]
  Language models are known to encode a great amount of factual knowledge through pretraining. Such knowledge might be insufficient to cater to user requests. When answering questions about ongoing events, the model should use recent news articles to update its response. When some facts are edited in the model, the updated facts should override all prior knowledge learned by the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T23:16:11Z)
• SOK-Bench: A Situated Video Reasoning Benchmark with Aligned Open-World Knowledge [60.76719375410635]
  We propose a new benchmark (SOK-Bench) consisting of 44K questions and 10K situations with instance-level annotations depicted in the videos. The reasoning process is required to understand and apply situated knowledge and general knowledge for problem-solving. We generate associated question-answer pairs and reasoning processes, finally followed by manual reviews for quality assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T21:55:31Z)
• Self-Bootstrapped Visual-Language Model for Knowledge Selection and Question Answering [11.183845003492964]
  We use Passage Retrieval (DPR) to retrieve related knowledge to help the model answer questions. DPR conduct retrieving in natural language space, which may not ensure comprehensive acquisition of image information. We propose a novel framework that leverages the visual-language model to select the key knowledge retrieved by DPR and answer questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T07:44:20Z)
• Robust and Scalable Model Editing for Large Language Models [75.95623066605259]
  We propose EREN (Edit models by REading Notes) to improve the scalability and robustness of LLM editing. Unlike existing techniques, it can integrate knowledge from multiple edits, and correctly respond to syntactically similar but semantically unrelated inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T06:57:23Z)
• Open-Set Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering with Inference Paths [79.55742631375063]
  The purpose of Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) is to provide a correct answer to the question with the aid of external knowledge bases. We propose a new retriever-ranker paradigm of KB-VQA, Graph pATH rankER (GATHER for brevity) Specifically, it contains graph constructing, pruning, and path-level ranking, which not only retrieves accurate answers but also provides inference paths that explain the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T09:12:50Z)
• Knowledge-Augmented Language Model Prompting for Zero-Shot Knowledge Graph Question Answering [7.888547093390469]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of performing zero-shot closed-book question answering tasks. We propose to augment the knowledge directly in the input of LLMs. Our framework, Knowledge-Augmented language model PromptING (KAPING), requires no model training, thus completely zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T04:15:21Z)
• Structured Knowledge Grounding for Question Answering [0.23068481501673416]
  We propose to leverage the language and knowledge for knowledge based question-answering with flexibility, breadth of coverage and structured reasoning. Specifically, we devise a knowledge construction method that retrieves the relevant context with a dynamic hop. And we devise a deep fusion mechanism to further bridge the information exchanging bottleneck between the language and the knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-17T08:48:50Z)
• Unsupervised Commonsense Question Answering with Self-Talk [71.63983121558843]
  We propose an unsupervised framework based on self-talk as a novel alternative to commonsense tasks. Inspired by inquiry-based discovery learning, our approach inquires language models with a number of information seeking questions. Empirical results demonstrate that the self-talk procedure substantially improves the performance of zero-shot language model baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T20:43:37Z)
• What Does My QA Model Know? Devising Controlled Probes using Expert Knowledge [36.13528043657398]
  We investigate whether state-of-the-art QA models have general knowledge about word definitions and general taxonomic reasoning. We use a methodology for automatically building datasets from various types of expert knowledge. Our evaluation confirms that transformer-based QA models are already predisposed to recognize certain types of structural lexical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-31T15:05:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.