A Trilemma in AMM Mechanism Design
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27602v1
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 19:20:52 GMT
- Title: A Trilemma in AMM Mechanism Design
- Abstract summary: We study a natural two-asset AMM mechanism design problem.<n>We investigate the (in)feasibility of simultaneously achieving IC and other desirable properties such as weak local efficiency (wLE) and uniform pricing (UP)<n>Our results can be summarized as a trilemma-style theorem.
- Score: 14.413372908638557
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Blockchains have popularized the Automated Market Makers (AMMs), where users trade crypto-assets directly with a smart contract, governed by a pricing function embedded in the contract's code. Today, users of AMMs are often forced to accept unfavorable prices due to widespread front-running and back-running attacks, commonly known as Miner Extractable Value (MEV). Several earlier works show impossibility results suggesting that completely removing MEV at the consensus layer is impossible, partly because the consensus layer is agnostic of application-level semantics. For this reason, more recent works have advocated mechanism design approaches at the application (i.e., smart contract) level. We study a natural two-asset AMM mechanism design problem recently initiated and explored in prior work by Chan, Wu, and Shi, in which they proposed a mechanism that satisfies a surprisingly strong notion of incentive compatibility (IC), under the consensus assumption that the underlying blockchain provides sequencing fairness. In this paper, we investigate the (in)feasibility of simultaneously achieving IC and other desirable properties such as weak local efficiency (wLE) and uniform pricing (UP). At a high level, wLE requires that the mechanism should not leave any unfulfilled demand from users whose asking prices are not overly restrictive, and whose orders could have been executed directly against the pool. UP requires that all orders that get (partially) executed must trade at the same exchange rate. We unveil the underlying mathematical structure of AMM mechanism design, and our main results can be summarized as a trilemma-style theorem: among the desirable properties IC, wLE, and UP, any two out of three are possible, but no mechanism can satisfy all three.
Related papers
- Towards Efficient Agents: A Co-Design of Inference Architecture and System [66.59916327634639]
This paper presents AgentInfer, a unified framework for end-to-end agent acceleration.<n>We decompose the problem into four synergistic components: AgentCollab, AgentSched, AgentSAM, and AgentCompress.<n>Experiments on the BrowseComp-zh and DeepDiver benchmarks demonstrate that through the synergistic collaboration of these methods, AgentInfer reduces ineffective token consumption by over 50%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-20T12:06:13Z) - Certifying optimal MEV strategies with Lean [0.0]
We present the first mechanized formalization of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)<n>MEV refers to a class of attacks to decentralized applications where the adversary profits by manipulating the ordering, inclusion, or exclusion of transactions in a blockchain.<n>We introduce a methodology to construct machine-checked proofs of MEV bounds, providing correctness guarantees beyond what is possible with existing techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T09:24:28Z) - LMM-Incentive: Large Multimodal Model-based Incentive Design for User-Generated Content in Web 3.0 [60.604760613035126]
Web 3.0 represents the next generation of the Internet, which is widely recognized as a decentralized ecosystem that focuses on value expression and data ownership.<n>By leveraging blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies, Web 3.0 offers unprecedented opportunities for users to create, own, and monetize their content.<n>Some self-interested users may exploit the limitations of content curation mechanisms and generate low-quality content with less effort, obtaining platform rewards under information asymmetry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T12:39:29Z) - RediSwap: MEV Redistribution Mechanism for CFMMs [6.475701705193783]
We introduce RediSwap, a novel AMM designed to capture Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) at the application level and refund it fairly among users and liquidity providers.
At its core, RediSwap features an MEV-redistribution mechanism that manages arbitrage opportunities within the AMM pool.
We prove that our mechanism is incentive-compatible and Sybil-proof, and demonstrate that it is easy for arbitrageurs to participate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T05:11:41Z) - Robust and Performance Incentivizing Algorithms for Multi-Armed Bandits with Strategic Agents [52.75161794035767]
We introduce a class of bandit algorithms that meet the two objectives of performance incentivization and robustness simultaneously.<n>We show that settings where the principal has no information about the arms' performance characteristics can be handled by combining ideas from second price auctions with our algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-13T06:54:49Z) - Towards a Theory of Maximal Extractable Value II: Uncertainty [4.07926531936425]
Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is value extractable by temporary monopoly power commonly found in decentralized systems.
This extraction stems from a lack of user privacy upon transaction submission and the ability of a monopolist validator to reorder, add, and/or censor transactions.
We show that neither fair ordering techniques nor economic mechanisms can individually mitigate MEV for arbitrary payoff functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-25T15:01:11Z) - Predictive Crypto-Asset Automated Market Making Architecture for
Decentralized Finance using Deep Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
The study proposes a quote-driven predictive automated market maker (AMM) platform with on-chain custody and settlement functions.
The proposed architecture is an augmentation to the Uniswap V3, a cryptocurrency AMM protocol, by utilizing a novel market equilibrium pricing for reduced divergence and slippage loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-28T01:13:22Z) - Learning Dynamic Mechanisms in Unknown Environments: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [123.55983746427572]
We propose novel learning algorithms to recover the dynamic Vickrey-Clarke-Grove (VCG) mechanism over multiple rounds of interaction.<n>A key contribution of our approach is incorporating reward-free online Reinforcement Learning (RL) to aid exploration over a rich policy space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-25T16:17:23Z) - Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [66.94149388181343]
We present a new version of a popular $Q$-learning algorithm for MARL.
We show that it can recover the optimal policy even with access to $Q*$.
We also demonstrate improved performance on predator-prey and challenging multi-agent StarCraft benchmark tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-18T18:34:50Z) - VCG Mechanism Design with Unknown Agent Values under Stochastic Bandit
Feedback [104.06766271716774]
We study a multi-round welfare-maximising mechanism design problem in instances where agents do not know their values.
We first define three notions of regret for the welfare, the individual utilities of each agent and that of the mechanism.
Our framework also provides flexibility to control the pricing scheme so as to trade-off between the agent and seller regrets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-19T18:00:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.