Simorgh at SemEval-2026 task 7: Region-Aware Hybrid Retrieval for Low-Resource Cultural Reasoning in Multilingual Question Answering
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27636v1
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 19:55:37 GMT
- Title: Simorgh at SemEval-2026 task 7: Region-Aware Hybrid Retrieval for Low-Resource Cultural Reasoning in Multilingual Question Answering
- Abstract summary: We investigate culturally grounded multiple-choice question answering with the BLEnD benchmark, which consists of a multilingual corpus of 30 languages.<n>We propose a region-aware hybrid retrieval approach that combines BM25 lexical matching and dense semantic similarity with regional weightings to improve the relevance of the answer.
- Score: 0.6882042556551609
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Although Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate excellent capabilities and performance for general reasoning tasks within the general public domain, they may face challenges with culturally grounded knowledge within languages with limited digital and textual data. In this paper, we investigate culturally grounded multiple-choice question answering with the BLEnD benchmark, which consists of a multilingual corpus of 30 languages and covers various socio-cultural domains, such as cuisine, sports, family, etc. We propose a region-aware hybrid retrieval approach that combines BM25 lexical matching and dense semantic similarity with regional weighting heuristics to improve the relevance of the answer. The retrieved documents are used to construct a structured prompt for the Qwen3-14B quantized model with logit-based deterministic answer selection. The experimental results show improvements to cross-lingual stability with the hybrid retrieval approach over pure parametric inference for culturally grounded question answering. However, there are still notable performance gaps between languages with more and less training data. This shows that the limitations of the retrieval augmentation approach are not entirely overcome by the training data imbalance problem.
Related papers
- A Systematic Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Consistency Enhancement Methods in Multilingual Language Models [50.27606276000142]
We present a unified evaluation of representative CLC-enhancement methods for question answering, spanning inference-time interventions and post-training approaches.<n>Results show that post-training methods are generally more reliable, with direct distribution alignment consistently improving CLC across all model-dataset combinations.<n>We investigate whether CLC enhancement hurts models' ability to respond differently *when needed*, that is, when asked culture-dependent questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-03T19:18:44Z) - BavGround: A Benchmark for Regional Cultural Grounding and Dialect Competence in Bavarian [33.0382356140632]
We introduce BavGround, a benchmark for evaluating Bavarian regional cultural grounding and dialect competence.<n>BavGround contains 206 multiple-choice source questions across eight cultural domains per language.<n>Strong multilingual models perform best overall, but performance drops on Bavarian items and source-grounded questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-13T07:23:53Z) - MSQA: A Natively Sourced Multilingual and Multicultural SimpleQA Benchmark [31.67992649991894]
A model that can speak a user's language must also understand the culture encoded by that language.<n>We introduce MSQA, a benchmark of 1,064 natively sourced questions across 11 language groups, five cultural dimensions, and three difficulty tiers.<n>We find substantial cultural degradation and a pronounced Locality Effect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T10:12:03Z) - Language-Coupled Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation [73.54930910609328]
We propose LcRL, a multilingual search-augmented reinforcement learning framework.<n>LcRL integrates a language-coupled Group Relative Policy Optimization into the policy and reward models.<n>We adopt the language-coupled group sampling in the rollout module to reduce knowledge bias, and regularize an auxiliary anti-consistency penalty in the reward models to mitigate the knowledge conflict.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-21T11:32:32Z) - I Am Aligned, But With Whom? MENA Values Benchmark for Evaluating Cultural Alignment and Multilingual Bias in LLMs [5.060243371992739]
We introduce MENAValues, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the cultural alignment and multilingual biases of large language models (LLMs)<n> Drawing from large-scale, authoritative human surveys, we curate a structured dataset that captures the sociocultural landscape of MENA with population-level response distributions from 16 countries.<n>Our analysis reveals three critical phenomena: "Cross-Lingual Value Shifts" where identical questions yield drastically different responses based on language, "Reasoning-Induced Degradation" where prompting models to explain their reasoning worsens cultural alignment, and "Logit Leakage" where models refuse sensitive questions while internal probabilities reveal strong hidden
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T05:10:57Z) - A method for improving multilingual quality and diversity of instruction fine-tuning datasets [29.07537849245622]
We introduce Multilingual Data Quality and Diversity (M-DaQ) to improve Multilingual Instruction Fine-Tuning (IFT)<n>M-DaQ is a novel method for improving LLMs multilinguality by selecting high-quality and semantically diverse multilingual IFT samples.<n> Empirical results across 18 languages demonstrate that models fine-tuned with M-DaQ achieve significant performance gains over vanilla baselines over 60% win rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-19T03:07:59Z) - Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation for Culturally-Sensitive Tasks: A Benchmark for Cross-lingual Robustness [30.00463676754559]
We introduce BordIRLines, a dataset of territorial disputes paired with retrieved Wikipedia documents, across 49 languages.<n>We evaluate the cross-lingual robustness of this RAG setting by formalizing several modes for multilingual retrieval.<n>Our experiments show that incorporating perspectives from diverse languages can in fact improve robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T01:59:07Z) - CaLMQA: Exploring culturally specific long-form question answering across 23 languages [58.18984409715615]
CaLMQA is a dataset of 51.7K culturally specific questions across 23 different languages.<n>We evaluate factuality, relevance and surface-level quality of LLM-generated long-form answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T17:45:26Z) - CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmark [68.21939124278065]
Culturally-diverse multilingual Visual Question Answering benchmark designed to cover a rich set of languages and cultures.
CVQA includes culturally-driven images and questions from across 30 countries on four continents, covering 31 languages with 13 scripts, providing a total of 10k questions.
We benchmark several Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on CVQA, and show that the dataset is challenging for the current state-of-the-art models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T01:59:00Z) - The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance.
Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes.
We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z) - ZusammenQA: Data Augmentation with Specialized Models for Cross-lingual
Open-retrieval Question Answering System [16.89747171947662]
This paper introduces our proposed system for the MIA Shared Task on Cross-lingual Open-retrieval Question Answering (COQA)
In this challenging scenario, given an input question the system has to gather evidence documents from a multilingual pool and generate an answer in the language of the question.
We devised several approaches combining different model variants for three main components: Data Augmentation, Passage Retrieval, and Answer Generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-30T10:31:08Z) - AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages
with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context.
It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts.
Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z) - XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoning [68.57658225995966]
Cross-lingual Choice of Plausible Alternatives (XCOPA) is a typologically diverse multilingual dataset for causal commonsense reasoning in 11 languages.
We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models on this novel dataset, revealing that the performance of current methods falls short compared to translation-based transfer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T12:22:33Z) - LAReQA: Language-agnostic answer retrieval from a multilingual pool [29.553907688813347]
LAReQA tests for "strong" cross-lingual alignment.
We find that augmenting training data via machine translation is effective.
This finding underscores our claim that languageagnostic retrieval is a substantively new kind of cross-lingual evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-11T20:51:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.