SuperValid: Capability-Aligned OOD Validation for Generalizable Downstream Scaling
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28179v1
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 09:01:09 GMT
- Title: SuperValid: Capability-Aligned OOD Validation for Generalizable Downstream Scaling
- Abstract summary: We argue that downstream scaling should be studied at the capability level.<n>We propose SuperValid, a framework that synthesizes OOD (out-of-distribution), capability-aligned validation data.
- Score: 9.40050823319082
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Scaling laws guide large language model training by relating compute to cross-entropy loss, and recent work further extends them to predict downstream benchmark performance. However, prior approaches face generalization limitations from two aspects: focusing on benchmark-level performance introduces scenario-specific artifacts, while relying on IID validation loss fails to track capability improvements when training distributions vary. In this work, we argue that downstream scaling should be studied at the capability level, which captures shared skill factors across related tasks while abstracting away benchmark-specific noise. We propose SuperValid, a framework that synthesizes OOD (out-of-distribution), capability-aligned validation data by distilling core concepts from benchmarks within a capability domain and expanding them into diverse, knowledge-rich texts. Extensive experiments spanning 17 benchmarks grouped into 6 capability domains show that SuperValid loss exhibits strong and stable correlation with downstream performance across models of different architectures, scales, and training data distributions. As a training-free metric computable during training without benchmark evaluation, SuperValid enables effective model selection, early stopping, and scaling decisions.
Related papers
- On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs [60.07459271263409]
We introduce a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training.<n>We propose RuDE, a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination.<n>Experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T11:33:49Z) - Benchmarking Few-shot Transferability of Pre-trained Models with Improved Evaluation Protocols [123.73663884421272]
Few-shot transfer has been revolutionized by stronger pre-trained models and improved adaptation algorithms.<n>We establish FEWTRANS, a comprehensive benchmark containing 10 diverse datasets.<n>By releasing FEWTRANS, we aim to provide a rigorous "ruler" to streamline reproducible advances in few-shot transfer learning research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-28T05:41:57Z) - Online Bayesian Imbalanced Learning with Bregman-Calibrated Deep Networks [0.7106986689736825]
We present textitOnline Bayesian Imbalanced Learning (OBIL), a principled framework that decouples likelihood-ratio estimation from class-prior assumptions.<n>Our approach builds on the established connection between Bregman divergences and proper scoring rules to show that deep networks trained with such losses produce posterior probability estimates.<n>We prove that these likelihood-ratio estimates remain valid under arbitrary changes in class priors and cost structures, requiring only a threshold adjustment for optimal Bayes decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-08T21:23:00Z) - Continual Action Quality Assessment via Adaptive Manifold-Aligned Graph Regularization [53.82400605816587]
Action Quality Assessment (AQA) quantifies human actions in videos, supporting applications in sports scoring, rehabilitation, and skill evaluation.<n>A major challenge lies in the non-stationary nature of quality distributions in real-world scenarios.<n>We introduce Continual AQA (CAQA), which equips with Continual Learning capabilities to handle evolving distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T10:09:47Z) - Capability Salience Vector: Fine-grained Alignment of Loss and Capabilities for Downstream Task Scaling Law [49.25050966412749]
We introduce Capability Salience Vector, which decomposes the overall loss and assigns different importance weights to tokens to assess a specific meta-capability.<n>Experiments on various popular benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed Capability Salience Vector could significantly improve the predictability of language model performance on downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T08:16:03Z) - The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning Models [69.798277882245]
We introduce Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning (UPFT) to enhance large language models' reasoning efficiency.<n>UPFT removes the need for labeled data or exhaustive sampling.<n> Experiments show that UPFT matches the performance of supervised methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T18:56:03Z) - Test-Time Training for Semantic Segmentation with Output Contrastive
Loss [12.535720010867538]
Deep learning-based segmentation models have achieved impressive performance on public benchmarks, but generalizing well to unseen environments remains a major challenge.
This paper introduces Contrastive Loss (OCL), known for its capability to learn robust and generalized representations, to stabilize the adaptation process.
Our method excels even when applied to models initially pre-trained using domain adaptation methods on test domain data, showcasing its resilience and adaptability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T03:13:47Z) - Modeling Uncertain Feature Representation for Domain Generalization [49.129544670700525]
We show that our method consistently improves the network generalization ability on multiple vision tasks.
Our methods are simple yet effective and can be readily integrated into networks without additional trainable parameters or loss constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-16T14:25:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.