Semi-Supervised Hypothesis Testing by Betting on Predictions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28533v1
• Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 14:28:28 GMT
• Title: Semi-Supervised Hypothesis Testing by Betting on Predictions
• Abstract summary: We introduce a testing-by-betting framework that leverages predictions on unlabeled data to enhance the power of sequential hypothesis testing.<n>We demonstrate power gains over baseline approaches, including prediction-powered inference.
• Score: 17.34147279018477
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce a testing-by-betting framework that leverages predictions on unlabeled data to enhance the power of sequential hypothesis testing. Given limited samples from the joint distribution of $(X,Y)$, and additional unlabeled samples from the marginal of $X$, we ask how unlabeled data can be used to hypothesize about the distribution of $Y$, and the conditional distribution of $Y\mid X$. We introduce an e-statistic and use it to construct a sequential test. Under standard distributional assumptions -- label shift or concept shift -- we establish that the test is anytime valid. Furthermore, we show that for binary data, the e-statistic has non-trivial power. Crucially, our approach retains these properties even when the underlying predictions are inaccurate. Through simulations and applications to large language models evaluation, we demonstrate power gains over baseline approaches, including prediction-powered inference. These gains persist even with relatively limited unlabeled data and when predictions have low accuracy due to weak correlation between $X$ and $Y$.

Related papers

• Distribution-informed Online Conformal Prediction [53.674678995825666]
  We propose Conformal Optimistic Prediction (COP), an online conformal prediction algorithm incorporating underlying data pattern into the update rule.<n>COP produces tighter prediction sets when predictable pattern exists, while retaining valid coverage guarantees even when estimates are inaccurate.<n>We prove that COP can achieve valid coverage and construct shorter prediction intervals than other baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T17:51:49Z)
• Regression-Based Estimation of Causal Effects in the Presence of Selection Bias and Confounding [52.1068936424622]
  We consider the problem of estimating the expected causal effect $E[Y|do(X)]$ for a target variable $Y$ when treatment $X$ is set by intervention.<n>In settings without selection bias or confounding, $E[Y|do(X)] = E[Y|X]$, which can be estimated using standard regression methods.<n>We propose a framework that incorporates both selection bias and confounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T13:43:37Z)
• Epistemic Uncertainty in Conformal Scores: A Unified Approach [2.449909275410288]
  Conformal prediction methods create prediction bands with distribution-free guarantees but do not explicitly capture uncertainty.<n>We introduce $texttEPICSCORE$, a model-agnostic approach that enhances any conformal score by explicitly integrating uncertainty.<n>$texttEPICSCORE$ adaptively expands predictive intervals in regions with limited data while maintaining compact intervals where data is abundant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T19:42:54Z)
• Doubly Robust Conditional Independence Testing with Generative Neural Networks [8.323172773256449]
  This article addresses the problem of testing the conditional independence of two generic random vectors $X$ and $Y$ given a third random vector $Z$. We propose a new non-parametric testing procedure that avoids explicitly estimating any conditional distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T01:28:59Z)
• Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [65.21599711087538]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and test data by adapting a given model w.r.t. any test sample.<n>Prior methods perform backpropagation for each test sample, resulting in unbearable optimization costs to many applications.<n>We propose an Efficient Anti-Forgetting Test-Time Adaptation (EATA) method which develops an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T05:49:45Z)
• Sequential Predictive Two-Sample and Independence Testing [114.4130718687858]
  We study the problems of sequential nonparametric two-sample and independence testing. We build upon the principle of (nonparametric) testing by betting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-29T01:30:33Z)
• The out-of-sample $R^2$: estimation and inference [0.0]
  We define the out-of-sample $R2$ as a comparison of two predictive models. We exploit recent theoretical advances on uncertainty of data splitting estimates to provide a standard error for the $hatR2$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T09:29:57Z)
• SLOE: A Faster Method for Statistical Inference in High-Dimensional Logistic Regression [68.66245730450915]
  We develop an improved method for debiasing predictions and estimating frequentist uncertainty for practical datasets. Our main contribution is SLOE, an estimator of the signal strength with convergence guarantees that reduces the computation time of estimation and inference by orders of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T17:48:56Z)
• Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shift [105.27463615756733]
  We focus on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for classification problems via two avenues. We first argue that label shift hurts UQ, by showing degradation in coverage and calibration. We examine these techniques theoretically in a distribution-free framework and demonstrate their excellent practical performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T20:51:03Z)
• Dimension-agnostic inference using cross U-statistics [33.17951971728784]
  We introduce an approach that uses variational representations of existing test statistics along with sample splitting and self-normalization. The resulting statistic can be viewed as a careful modification of degenerate U-statistics, dropping diagonal blocks and retaining off-diagonal blocks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-10T12:21:34Z)
• Robust Validation: Confident Predictions Even When Distributions Shift [19.327409270934474]
  We describe procedures for robust predictive inference, where a model provides uncertainty estimates on its predictions rather than point predictions. We present a method that produces prediction sets (almost exactly) giving the right coverage level for any test distribution in an $f$-divergence ball around the training population. An essential component of our methodology is to estimate the amount of expected future data shift and build robustness to it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T17:09:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.