Causal Label Recovery in Payment Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29272v1
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 02:43:34 GMT
• Title: Causal Label Recovery in Payment Networks
• Abstract summary: Fraud detection models in payment networks train on chargeback labels that are systematically biased.<n>A companion paper [arXiv05:26.27557] proved that these four impairments impose a minimax lower bound on detection performance.<n>We formalize the observation pipeline as a sequential missing-data problem with three stages and a corruption layer, and construct the Sequential Triply Robust estimator.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Fraud detection models in payment networks train on chargeback labels that are systematically biased. Every label must survive three sequential gates: authorization (declined transactions generate no labels), issuer reporting (unreported fraud is invisible), and delay (pending chargebacks are missing at training time). Labels that do arrive may be corrupted by first-party misuse or issuer misclassification. A companion paper [arXiv:2605.27557] proved that these four impairments impose a minimax lower bound on detection performance. This paper asks: can that bound be achieved? We formalize the observation pipeline as a sequential missing-data problem with three propensity stages and a corruption layer, and construct the Sequential Triply Robust (STR) estimator. The STR corrects for all four impairments simultaneously and achieves the semiparametric efficiency bound -- no estimator can have lower asymptotic variance. It is sequentially triply robust: at each gate, consistency requires only that either the propensity model or the outcome regression is correctly specified, not both. We provide corruption correction via noise-rate-adjusted pseudo-labels, empirical Bayes shrinkage to stabilize inverse-propensity weights for small issuers, a plug-in variance estimator yielding valid confidence intervals, and a Bernstein concentration inequality for finite-sample guarantees. On the operational side, we derive the optimal training delay -- the maturity window that minimizes the sum of label-quality loss and model staleness -- and prove that the STR permits training on data that is days old rather than months old, decoupling model freshness from the chargeback maturity cycle. The STR provably dominates naive chargeback-based training in mean squared error for any sample size.

Related papers

• Knowing When to Ask for Help: Bayesian Self-Escalation in Hierarchical LLM Agents [0.0]
  Current agent systems decide delegation before reasoning begins.<n>We study a third regime: an agent that recognises, during its own reasoning, that it is unlikely to succeed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T05:35:07Z)
• A Step Towards Robust Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning [2.436631469537453]
  We propose textbfSFT+RL, a two-stage robust UDA framework that integratesSupervised Fine Tuning and Reinforcement Learning.<n>textbfSFT+RL achieves average improvements of textbf10.2% in clean accuracy and textbf15.8% in adversarial robustness across three datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-03T20:56:12Z)
• Predicting Inference-Time Scaling Gains from Labeled Validation-Set Output Statistics [0.42970700836450487]
  Best-of-$N$ inference scaling improves accuracy by an amount that varies across models, but currently requires running the procedure end-to-end.<n>We fit ridge predictors on features computed from a single validation-set sampling pass, use bootstrap-Lasso as a stability analysis of the candidate feature set, and give a concentration analysis with an explicit linear-approximation residual.<n>A compact ridge predictor built from this core plus an entropy add-on reaches Spearman $= 0.90$ with actual best-of-$N$ gain under a reward-model verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T00:38:51Z)
• When to Trust Confidence Thresholding: Calibration Diagnostics for Pseudo-Labelled Regression [1.14219428942199]
  A standard practice is to threshold the calibrated score at a confidence cutoff and treat the hard label as the truth.<n>We develop a calibration-aware diagnostic apparatus for pseudo-labelling pipelines.<n>We derive a closed-form expression for the attenuation bias that confidence thresholding induces in the downstream regression coefficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T21:49:11Z)
• Bootstrapping with AI/ML-generated labels [0.0]
  We show that a seemingly natural fixed-label bootstrap, which generates data using estimated labels but relies on a corrupted version in estimation, is generally invalid unless a strong independence condition holds.<n>We propose a coupled-label bootstrap that jointly resamples the true and imputed labels, and show it is valid without this condition.<n>We illustrate the methods in simulations and apply them to investigate the relationship between wages and remote work status.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T15:48:03Z)
• Self-Calibrating Language Models via Test-Time Discriminative Distillation [18.46710400838861]
  Large language models (LLMs) are systematically overconfident on questions they often answer incorrectly.<n>We introduce $textbfSECL$ ($textbfSE$lf-$textbfC$alibrating $textbfL$anguage Models), a test-time training (TTT) pipeline that exploits this gap as label-free self-supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T13:28:50Z)
• Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
  We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z)
• Online Bayesian Imbalanced Learning with Bregman-Calibrated Deep Networks [0.7106986689736825]
  We present textitOnline Bayesian Imbalanced Learning (OBIL), a principled framework that decouples likelihood-ratio estimation from class-prior assumptions.<n>Our approach builds on the established connection between Bregman divergences and proper scoring rules to show that deep networks trained with such losses produce posterior probability estimates.<n>We prove that these likelihood-ratio estimates remain valid under arbitrary changes in class priors and cost structures, requiring only a threshold adjustment for optimal Bayes decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T21:23:00Z)
• Reliable Active Learning from Unreliable Labels via Neural Collapse Geometry [5.1511135538176]
  Active Learning (AL) promises to reduce annotation cost by prioritizing informative samples, yet its reliability is undermined when labels are noisy or when the data distribution shifts.<n>We propose Active Learning via Neural Collapse Geometry (NCAL-R), a framework that leverages the emergent geometric regularities of deep networks to counteract unreliable supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T17:50:31Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable yet Noisy Rewards under Imperfect Verifiers [90.50039419576807]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) trains policies against automated verifiers to avoid costly human labeling.<n>To reduce vulnerability to verifier hacking, many RLVR systems collapse rewards to binary $0,1$ during training.<n>This choice carries a cost: it introduces textitfalse negatives (rejecting correct answers, FNs) and textitfalse positives (accepting incorrect ones, FPs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T13:56:44Z)
• Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [65.21599711087538]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and test data by adapting a given model w.r.t. any test sample.<n>Prior methods perform backpropagation for each test sample, resulting in unbearable optimization costs to many applications.<n>We propose an Efficient Anti-Forgetting Test-Time Adaptation (EATA) method which develops an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T05:49:45Z)
• All Points Matter: Entropy-Regularized Distribution Alignment for Weakly-supervised 3D Segmentation [67.30502812804271]
  Pseudo-labels are widely employed in weakly supervised 3D segmentation tasks where only sparse ground-truth labels are available for learning. We propose a novel learning strategy to regularize the generated pseudo-labels and effectively narrow the gaps between pseudo-labels and model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T08:19:31Z)
• Label Distributionally Robust Losses for Multi-class Classification: Consistency, Robustness and Adaptivity [55.29408396918968]
  We study a family of loss functions named label-distributionally robust (LDR) losses for multi-class classification. Our contributions include both consistency and robustness by establishing top-$k$ consistency of LDR losses for multi-class classification. We propose a new adaptive LDR loss that automatically adapts the individualized temperature parameter to the noise degree of class label of each instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-30T00:27:30Z)
• Exploiting Sample Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [137.9939571408506]
  We estimate and exploit the credibility of the assigned pseudo-label of each sample to alleviate the influence of noisy labels. Our uncertainty-guided optimization brings significant improvement and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T04:09:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.