SkillsInjector: Dynamic Skill Context Construction for LLM Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29794v1
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 11:44:32 GMT
- Title: SkillsInjector: Dynamic Skill Context Construction for LLM Agents
- Abstract summary: Existing methods treat skill injection as a static step, selecting skills with fixed criteria, fixing the budget in advance, and leaving descriptions unchanged.<n>We propose SkillsInjector, a two-stage adaptive method that jointly addresses these decisions.<n>Across tau2-bench, SkillsBench, and ALFWorld, SkillsInjector achieves the highest score, improving over the strongest baseline by 3.9, 6.1, and 7.3 percentage points, respectively.
- Score: 16.631471381875816
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: LLM agents now draw on growing skill libraries to handle complex tasks. However, injecting more skills does not always improve task completion and can even degrade it. Existing methods still treat skill injection as a static step, selecting skills with fixed criteria, fixing the budget in advance, and leaving descriptions unchanged. We argue that this static treatment can undermine the utility of skills, because which skills are exposed, how many are included, and how they are presented all affect downstream performance. We propose SkillsInjector, a two-stage adaptive method that jointly addresses these decisions. First, a context planner learns execution-grounded skill preferences and admits an adaptive number of skills for each task. A set-aware renderer then tailors how selected descriptions are presented relative to their co-injected neighbors. Across tau2-bench, SkillsBench, and ALFWorld, SkillsInjector achieves the highest score, improving over the strongest baseline by 3.9, 6.1, and 7.3 percentage points, respectively. Ablation studies show that skill selection, adaptive budgeting, and set-aware rendering each contribute to the gain. These results show that skill-augmented agents benefit from optimizing the injected context itself. Code will be released upon publication
Related papers
- SkillAlign: Aligning Skill Interfaces for LLM-based Agents [14.545296091572688]
We argue that the same skill can help, distract, or mislead depending on how it is exposed.<n>We propose SkillAlign, a provider-agnostic framework that represents candidate skills as multiview procedural cards.<n>Our results suggest that skill-augmented agents should optimize not only which skills to use, but also how those skills are presented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-07T09:11:03Z) - Write, Execute, Refine: From Skill Followers to Skill Optimizers via Reinforcement Learning from Execution Feedback [52.78692582507693]
Expert-written natural language skills can improve tool-using agents, yet agent-authored skills perform 8-11 points worse than using no skill.<n>We study how to organize execution experience from intermediate skills into training states for an executor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-18T09:52:48Z) - Task Decomposition-Guided Reranking for Adaptive Agent Skill Retrieval [16.270741233471107]
We propose SkillReranker, an inference-time reranking framework for adaptive skill selection.<n>We show that SkillReranker effectively improves task performance, reduces environment interaction steps, and lowers token consumption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T13:49:08Z) - Generative Skill Composition for LLM Agents [58.47191648555256]
LLM agents benefit from skills for solving complex tasks.<n>As skill libraries grow, selecting an appropriate skill composition has emerged as a central bottleneck.<n>We propose SkillComposer, which instantiates structured skill composition as task-conditioned skill sequence prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-30T17:53:09Z) - SkillComposer: Learning to Evolve Agent Skills for Specification and Generalization [99.18305770138677]
Agent skills are reusable strategies that guide agent reasoning and action.<n>Current skill construction methods treat the problem as one-shot extraction.<n>We introduce SkillComposer, a framework that decomposes skill construction into three learnable operations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T12:16:08Z) - SkillGraph: Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Agents via Evolving Skill Graphs [70.1970574147839]
We propose SKILLGRAPH, a framework that represents reusable skills as nodes in a directed graph.<n>SKILLGRAPH retrieves not just individual skills, but an ordered skill subgraph that can guide multi-step decision making.<n> Experiments show that SKILLGRAPH achieves state-of-the-art performance against memory-augmented RL methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T12:21:49Z) - Skill-R1: Agent Skill Evolution via Reinforcement Learning [84.35984979949502]
Skill-R1 is a reinforcement learning framework for instance-level recurrent skill optimization from verifiable rewards.<n>It preserves black-box compatibility with both open- and closed-source models while making adaptation substantially cheaper than model-level updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T06:19:15Z) - SkillLens: Adaptive Multi-Granularity Skill Reuse for Cost-Efficient LLM Agents [6.293920920196533]
SkillLens is a hierarchical skill-evolution framework that organizes skills into a four-layer graph of policies, strategies, procedures, and primitives.<n>It retrieves semantically relevant skill seeds, expands them through degree-corrected random walk over the skill graph, and then uses a verifier to decide whether each visited unit should be accepted, decomposed, rewritten, or skipped.<n>Across MuLocbench and ALFWorld, SkillLens consistently improves over strong skill-based baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T18:48:04Z) - From Context to Skills: Can Language Models Learn from Context Skillfully? [56.5857437218136]
Ctx2Skill is a self-evolving framework that autonomously discovers, refines, and selects context-specific skills.<n>It can be plugged into any language model to obtain better context learning capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T09:53:15Z) - Graph of Skills: Dependency-Aware Structural Retrieval for Massive Agent Skills [27.93279540484981]
Graph of Skills (GoS) is an inference-time structural retrieval layer for large skill libraries.<n>GoS improves average reward by 43.6% over the vanilla full skill-loading baseline.<n>GoS consistently outperforms both vanilla skills loading and simple vector retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T02:09:11Z) - How Well Do Agentic Skills Work in the Wild: Benchmarking LLM Skill Usage in Realistic Settings [29.3744517703302]
We study the first comprehensive study of skill utility under progressively challenging realistic settings.<n>Our findings reveal that performance gains degrade consistently as settings become more realistic.<n>We show that query-specific refinement substantially recovers lost performance when the initial skills are of reasonable relevance and quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-06T00:10:30Z) - SKILL0: In-Context Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Skill Internalization [61.37478254738943]
Inference-time skill augmentation is fundamentally limited.<n>We introduce SKILL0, an in-context reinforcement learning framework designed for skill internalization.<n>SKILL0 achieves substantial improvements over the standard RL baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T17:03:05Z) - SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks [61.89812116484928]
Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time.<n>We present SkillsBench, a benchmark of 86 tasks across 11 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers.<n>We show curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain.<n>Self-generated Skills provide no benefit on average, showing that models cannot reliably author the procedural knowledge they benefit from consuming.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T07:06:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.