AI for Monitoring and Classifying Data Used in Research Literature

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30582v1
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 21:18:30 GMT
• Title: AI for Monitoring and Classifying Data Used in Research Literature
• Abstract summary: No comparable infrastructure exists for monitoring dataset usage in research literature.<n>Traditional NLP approaches struggle with these challenges.<n>We introduce a multitask GLiNER-based framework that jointly performs dataset mention extraction, relation identification, and usage-context classification.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: While platforms like Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar track citations for academic papers, no comparable infrastructure exists for monitoring dataset usage in research literature, leaving the landscape of data use largely opaque. Addressing this gap is critical for transparency, reproducibility, and monitoring of impact, yet progress is hindered by inconsistent citation practices, scarce labeled data, and ambiguous references to datasets in the wild. Traditional NLP approaches struggle with these challenges, motivating the shift toward more adaptive, semantically rich models. Building on prior work using LLMs for data mention detection and synthetic data for bootstrapping training, this paper presents an updated methodology for scalable dataset monitoring. We introduce a multitask GLiNER-based framework that jointly performs dataset mention extraction, relation identification, and usage-context classification. To address label scarcity, the pipeline leverages synthetic data generation to produce training examples and LLM-based revalidation to filter incorrect mentions and enforce labeling consistency, together improving reliability, coverage, and output consistency across the training pipeline. This work advances the development of open-source tools for monitoring data use in research literature, contributing to the broader goal of generalizable, unconstrained dataset citation tracking.

Related papers

• Extracting Dataset Mentions in Forced Displacement and FCV Documents: A Weakly Supervised Framework with LLM-Based Label Refinement [0.0]
  We present a framework for adapting dataset extraction to forced displacement and Fragile, Conflict, and Violence (FCV) documents.<n>A lightweight model trained on general research literature generates candidate dataset mentions from unlabeled domain documents.<n>We evaluate the resulting model on an independent gold-standard benchmark of 1,706 text passages spanning research, humanitarian, and operational documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T18:34:08Z)
• Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs [66.63911043019294]
  Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them.<n>This paper focuses on the use of LLM techniques to prepare data for diverse downstream tasks.<n>We introduce a task-centric taxonomy that organizes the field into three major tasks: data cleaning, standardization, error processing, imputation, data integration, and data enrichment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T12:02:45Z)
• Adapting Vision-Language Models Without Labels: A Comprehensive Survey [74.17944178027015]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities across a wide range of tasks.<n>Recent research has increasingly focused on unsupervised adaptation methods that do not rely on labeled data.<n>We propose a taxonomy based on the availability and nature of unlabeled visual data, categorizing existing approaches into four key paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T16:27:37Z)
• Large Language Models and Synthetic Data for Monitoring Dataset Mentions in Research Papers [0.0]
  This paper presents a machine learning framework that automates dataset mention detection across research domains.<n>We employ zero-shot extraction from research papers, an LLM-as-a-Judge for quality assessment, and a reasoning agent for refinement to generate a weakly supervised synthetic dataset.<n>At inference, a ModernBERT-based classifier efficiently filters dataset mentions, reducing computational overhead while maintaining high recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T16:16:02Z)
• DSAI: Unbiased and Interpretable Latent Feature Extraction for Data-Centric AI [24.349800949355465]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle to objectively identify latent characteristics in large datasets.<n>We propose Data Scientist AI (DSAI), a framework that enables unbiased and interpretable feature extraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T08:47:05Z)
• Web-Scale Visual Entity Recognition: An LLM-Driven Data Approach [56.55633052479446]
  Web-scale visual entity recognition presents significant challenges due to the lack of clean, large-scale training data. We propose a novel methodology to curate such a dataset, leveraging a multimodal large language model (LLM) for label verification, metadata generation, and rationale explanation. Experiments demonstrate that models trained on this automatically curated data achieve state-of-the-art performance on web-scale visual entity recognition tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T06:55:24Z)
• Putting Data at the Centre of Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [3.623224034411137]
  offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is an exciting direction of research that uses static datasets to find optimal control policies for multi-agent systems. Though the field is by definition data-driven, efforts have thus far neglected data in their drive to achieve state-of-the-art results. We show how the majority of works generate their own datasets without consistent methodology and provide sparse information about the characteristics of these datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T14:13:24Z)
• Language Semantic Graph Guided Data-Efficient Learning [10.039953846594805]
  We introduce a Language Semantic Graph (LSG) which is constructed from labels manifest as natural language descriptions. An auxiliary graph neural network is trained to extract high-level semantic relations and then used to guide the training of the primary model. Our in-depth analysis shows that the LSG method also expedites the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T08:54:57Z)
• ALP: Action-Aware Embodied Learning for Perception [60.64801970249279]
  We introduce Action-Aware Embodied Learning for Perception (ALP) ALP incorporates action information into representation learning through a combination of optimizing a reinforcement learning policy and an inverse dynamics prediction objective. We show that ALP outperforms existing baselines in several downstream perception tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T21:51:04Z)
• Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifacts [62.63504976810927]
  We propose methods to facilitate identification of training data artifacts. We show that this proposed training-feature attribution approach can be used to uncover artifacts in training data. We execute a small user study to evaluate whether these methods are useful to NLP researchers in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T09:26:13Z)
• ORDisCo: Effective and Efficient Usage of Incremental Unlabeled Data for Semi-supervised Continual Learning [52.831894583501395]
  Continual learning assumes the incoming data are fully labeled, which might not be applicable in real applications. We propose deep Online Replay with Discriminator Consistency (ORDisCo) to interdependently learn a classifier with a conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) We show ORDisCo achieves significant performance improvement on various semi-supervised learning benchmark datasets for SSCL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T09:04:14Z)
• Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation with Distant Supervision [69.15410325679635]
  We propose a new generation task called Partially-Aligned Data-to-Text Generation (PADTG) It is more practical since it utilizes automatically annotated data for training and thus considerably expands the application domains. Our framework outperforms all baseline models as well as verify the feasibility of utilizing partially-aligned data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-03T03:18:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.